Re: [http-state] HTTP WG meeting @IETF-80 Prague CZ ?
Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter@stpeter.im> Sun, 13 March 2011 21:01 UTC
Return-Path: <stpeter@stpeter.im>
X-Original-To: http-state@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: http-state@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 02E593A6BAB for <http-state@core3.amsl.com>; Sun, 13 Mar 2011 14:01:43 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.614
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.614 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.015, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id JV-jn-62nxC0 for <http-state@core3.amsl.com>; Sun, 13 Mar 2011 14:01:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from stpeter.im (stpeter.im [207.210.219.233]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C1D143A6BA7 for <http-state@ietf.org>; Sun, 13 Mar 2011 14:01:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from squire.local (dsl-251-69.dynamic-dsl.frii.net [216.17.251.69]) (Authenticated sender: stpeter) by stpeter.im (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4DAB440022; Sun, 13 Mar 2011 15:03:18 -0600 (MDT)
Message-ID: <4D7D30FC.1020006@stpeter.im>
Date: Sun, 13 Mar 2011 15:02:52 -0600
From: Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter@stpeter.im>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.5; en-US; rv:1.9.2.15) Gecko/20110303 Thunderbird/3.1.9
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: tho <tho@koanlogic.com>
References: <4D432F58.3080406@KingsMountain.com> <0256B9B7-D58D-4A28-9B64-E1B8B8FBF646@koanlogic.com>
In-Reply-To: <0256B9B7-D58D-4A28-9B64-E1B8B8FBF646@koanlogic.com>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.1.1
OpenPGP: url=http://www.saint-andre.com/me/stpeter.asc
Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pkcs7-signature"; micalg="sha1"; boundary="------------ms000704020809090501010607"
Cc: =JeffH <Jeff.Hodges@KingsMountain.com>, IETF HTTP State WG <http-state@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [http-state] HTTP WG meeting @IETF-80 Prague CZ ?
X-BeenThere: http-state@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discuss HTTP State Management Mechanism <http-state.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/http-state>, <mailto:http-state-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/http-state>
List-Post: <mailto:http-state@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:http-state-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/http-state>, <mailto:http-state-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 13 Mar 2011 21:01:43 -0000
On 3/13/11 2:54 PM, tho wrote: > On Jan 28, 2011, at 10:04 PM, =JeffH wrote: >> Do folks feel there is a need to hold a f2f HTTP WG meeting >> @IETF-80 Prague CZ (March 27-April 1) ? >> >> We have a couple weeks to decide. >> >> draft-ietf-httpstate-cookie is almost complete. If folks have >> burning ideas for new/enhanced HTTP State Management approaches to >> present/discuss face-to-face, and are prepared to do so, that'd be >> a reason to have a session. Otherwise, we can skip IETF-80, and >> figure out whether we actually have follow-on work, what it might >> be, discuss rechartering, and see about meeting @IETF-81 Quebec >> (say). >> >> thanks, > > Has something been decided in this regard ? The cut-off date has passed and a session was not requested. However, as the responsible AD I'd be curious to hear if people have a strong interest in -- and willingness to devote time and energy to -- work on next-generation state management technologies. Peter -- Peter Saint-Andre https://stpeter.im/