IETF Logo Mail Archive

[Ianaplan] Consensus Re: Consensus? Question from the ICG

"Leslie Daigle (ThinkingCat)" <ldaigle@thinkingcat.com> Thu, 19 February 2015 16:03 UTC

Return-Path: <ldaigle@thinkingcat.com>
X-Original-To: ianaplan@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ianaplan@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1608B1A9136 for <ianaplan@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 19 Feb 2015 08:03:31 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id GDmCoyXrUzRL for <ianaplan@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 19 Feb 2015 08:03:23 -0800 (PST)
Received: from zoidberg.ecotroph.net (zeke.ecotroph.net [70.164.19.155]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BB0101A90E5 for <ianaplan@ietf.org>; Thu, 19 Feb 2015 08:03:23 -0800 (PST)
Received: from aran.int.lexiconix.com (pool-108-44-246-138.clppva.fios.verizon.net [108.44.246.138]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by zoidberg.ecotroph.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE07CA05A1; Thu, 19 Feb 2015 11:03:22 -0500 (EST)
Message-ID: <54E60949.6050706@thinkingcat.com>
Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2015 11:03:21 -0500
From: "Leslie Daigle (ThinkingCat)" <ldaigle@thinkingcat.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.9; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.4.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "ianaplan@ietf.org" <ianaplan@ietf.org>
References: <54E214E9.3020103@thinkingcat.com>
In-Reply-To: <54E214E9.3020103@thinkingcat.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ianaplan/lB3Q0TfvQTxBNLN4ZVDxaXPkEXE>
Cc: Marc Blanchet <marc.blanchet@viagenie.ca>
Subject: [Ianaplan] Consensus Re: Consensus? Question from the ICG
X-BeenThere: ianaplan@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IANA Plan <ianaplan.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ianaplan>, <mailto:ianaplan-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ianaplan/>
List-Post: <mailto:ianaplan@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ianaplan-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ianaplan>, <mailto:ianaplan-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2015 16:03:31 -0000

Thanks, everyone, for your responses and input.

I have heard some concerns from Jefsey about the scope of "IETF Trust" 
versus the Internet community, and one person observed, out of band, 
that the last bullet reads properly if it says "on behalf" instead of 
"in behalf".

Other than that, there is support for these points.  So, Marc & I are 
declaring that the WG has consensus on the points:


     With regards to the IANA trademark and the IANA.ORG domain, both
are associated with the IANA Numbering Services and not with a
particular IANA Numbering Services Operator.

     The IETF considers the IETF Trust to be an acceptable candidate for
holding the trademark and domain.

     The IETF would support a decision by the IETF Trust to hold the
IANA mark, and iana.org domain on behalf of the Internet community.


Thanks,
Leslie.



On 2/16/15 11:03 AM, Leslie Daigle (ThinkingCat) wrote:
>
> All,
>
> There seems to be general agreement that there is not an incompatibility
> between the RIR proposal requirement and the IETF's proposal.
>
> We would like to determine if there is consensus on the following
> points, as expressed by Dave Crocker (thanks!) on February 9, 2015:
>
>      With regards to the IANA trademark and the IANA.ORG domain, both
> are associated with the IANA Numbering Services and not with a
> particular IANA Numbering Services Operator.
>
>      The IETF considers the IETF Trust to be an acceptable candidate for
> holding the trademark and domain.
>
>      The IETF would support a decision by the IETF Trust to hold the
> IANA mark, and iana.org domain in behalf of the Internet community.
>
>
>
> If there are objections to these points, please let us know by 00h00 UTC
> on February 19, 2015.
>
> Leslie/Marc.
>

-- 

-------------------------------------------------------------------
Leslie Daigle
Principal, ThinkingCat Enterprises
ldaigle@thinkingcat.com
-------------------------------------------------------------------

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email