[Idr] WG LC missed IPR Statements - 1 WG LC for IPR

"Susan Hares" <shares@ndzh.com> Fri, 05 February 2016 20:04 UTC

Return-Path: <shares@ndzh.com>
X-Original-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C510D1ACE51; Fri, 5 Feb 2016 12:04:22 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -96.257
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-96.257 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DOS_OUTLOOK_TO_MX=2.845, FH_RELAY_NODNS=1.451, HELO_MISMATCH_COM=0.553, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RDNS_NONE=0.793, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id wKakfsWacn3R; Fri, 5 Feb 2016 12:04:21 -0800 (PST)
Received: from hickoryhill-consulting.com (unknown [50.245.122.97]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E30091ACE4C; Fri, 5 Feb 2016 12:04:20 -0800 (PST)
X-Default-Received-SPF: pass (skip=loggedin (res=PASS)) x-ip-name=74.43.47.30;
From: Susan Hares <shares@ndzh.com>
To: idr@ietf.org
Date: Fri, 05 Feb 2016 15:04:03 -0500
Message-ID: <002401d16050$5cba52e0$162ef8a0$@ndzh.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0025_01D16026.73E58360"
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 14.0
Thread-Index: AdFgTvATc4xhvDpqSdanGhK2hw1rbA==
Content-Language: en-us
X-Authenticated-User: skh@ndzh.com
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/idr/BSUypNDzhL1p_kbbeeMN12q4k5M>
Cc: draft-ietf-idr-sla-exchange@ietf.org
Subject: [Idr] WG LC missed IPR Statements - 1 WG LC for IPR
X-BeenThere: idr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing <idr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/idr/>
List-Post: <mailto:idr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 05 Feb 2016 20:04:22 -0000

After a long review/edit cycle after WG LC,
draft-ietf-idr-sla-exchange-07.txt is ready to go to the IESG.   You can see
the resulting text at: 

 https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-idr-sla-exchange/

 

However, in checking the IPR statements the IDR chairs missed two steps in
the process: 

 

Step 1:  There was IPR declared in the mail message regarding
draft-ietf-idr-sla-exchange-03:
https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/idr/rPvMVsFcM4xOm1Vz_HNdAM3P250

 

This IPR is unusual in that the holder of the patent is not one of the
authors of the draft as the link shows: 

https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/search/?id=draft-ietf-idr-sla-exchange
<https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/search/?id=draft-ietf-idr-sla-exchange&sub
mit=draft> &submit=draft

 

As a WG Chairs, we must ask again if the WG wants to approve the draft in
the face of this patent.  This begins a 1 Week IPR LC where the WG must send
positive indications they wish to send this document to WG LC.  This message
was sent prior to the WG LC (1/19/2015 to 2/5/2015), but no specific mention
was made.  Due to IPR policy, we must get a positive affirmation that the WG
LC wants to adopt this work.  All authors to the draft MUST respond to this
IPR call or we cannot forward this to the IESG for publication. 

 

Details on these implementations of draft-ietf-idr-sla-exchange are at: 

https://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/idr/trac/wiki/draft-ietf-idr-sla-exchange%20i
mplementations

 

 

Step 2:  three of the authors did not declare IPR on-list:  Keyur Patel,  S.
Bajaj,  L. Tomotaki

 

These authors need to declare if they know if additional IPR.

 

Thank you for your patience, 

 

Sue Hares and John Scudder