[Idr] WG LC missed IPR Statements - 1 WG LC for IPR
"Susan Hares" <shares@ndzh.com> Fri, 05 February 2016 20:04 UTC
Return-Path: <shares@ndzh.com>
X-Original-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C510D1ACE51; Fri, 5 Feb 2016 12:04:22 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -96.257
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-96.257 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DOS_OUTLOOK_TO_MX=2.845, FH_RELAY_NODNS=1.451, HELO_MISMATCH_COM=0.553, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RDNS_NONE=0.793, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id wKakfsWacn3R; Fri, 5 Feb 2016 12:04:21 -0800 (PST)
Received: from hickoryhill-consulting.com (unknown [50.245.122.97]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E30091ACE4C; Fri, 5 Feb 2016 12:04:20 -0800 (PST)
X-Default-Received-SPF: pass (skip=loggedin (res=PASS)) x-ip-name=74.43.47.30;
From: Susan Hares <shares@ndzh.com>
To: idr@ietf.org
Date: Fri, 05 Feb 2016 15:04:03 -0500
Message-ID: <002401d16050$5cba52e0$162ef8a0$@ndzh.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0025_01D16026.73E58360"
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 14.0
Thread-Index: AdFgTvATc4xhvDpqSdanGhK2hw1rbA==
Content-Language: en-us
X-Authenticated-User: skh@ndzh.com
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/idr/BSUypNDzhL1p_kbbeeMN12q4k5M>
Cc: draft-ietf-idr-sla-exchange@ietf.org
Subject: [Idr] WG LC missed IPR Statements - 1 WG LC for IPR
X-BeenThere: idr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing <idr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/idr/>
List-Post: <mailto:idr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 05 Feb 2016 20:04:22 -0000
After a long review/edit cycle after WG LC, draft-ietf-idr-sla-exchange-07.txt is ready to go to the IESG. You can see the resulting text at: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-idr-sla-exchange/ However, in checking the IPR statements the IDR chairs missed two steps in the process: Step 1: There was IPR declared in the mail message regarding draft-ietf-idr-sla-exchange-03: https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/idr/rPvMVsFcM4xOm1Vz_HNdAM3P250 This IPR is unusual in that the holder of the patent is not one of the authors of the draft as the link shows: https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/search/?id=draft-ietf-idr-sla-exchange <https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/search/?id=draft-ietf-idr-sla-exchange&sub mit=draft> &submit=draft As a WG Chairs, we must ask again if the WG wants to approve the draft in the face of this patent. This begins a 1 Week IPR LC where the WG must send positive indications they wish to send this document to WG LC. This message was sent prior to the WG LC (1/19/2015 to 2/5/2015), but no specific mention was made. Due to IPR policy, we must get a positive affirmation that the WG LC wants to adopt this work. All authors to the draft MUST respond to this IPR call or we cannot forward this to the IESG for publication. Details on these implementations of draft-ietf-idr-sla-exchange are at: https://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/idr/trac/wiki/draft-ietf-idr-sla-exchange%20i mplementations Step 2: three of the authors did not declare IPR on-list: Keyur Patel, S. Bajaj, L. Tomotaki These authors need to declare if they know if additional IPR. Thank you for your patience, Sue Hares and John Scudder
- [Idr] WG LC missed IPR Statements - 1 WG LC for I… Susan Hares
- Re: [Idr] WG LC missed IPR Statements - 1 WG LC f… Tomotaki, Luis M
- Re: [Idr] WG LC missed IPR Statements - 1 WG LC f… Keyur Patel (keyupate)
- Re: [Idr] WG LC missed IPR Statements - 1 WG LC f… Sandeep Bajaj
- Re: [Idr] WG LC missed IPR Statements - 1 WG LC f… Gaurav Dawra (gdawra)
- Re: [Idr] WG LC missed IPR Statements - 1 WG LC f… Anoop Kapoor (ankapoor)
- Re: [Idr] WG LC missed IPR Statements - 1 WG LC f… Mohammed Mirza (mohamirz)
- Re: [Idr] WG LC missed IPR Statements - 1 WG LC f… Steven Cheung (stecheun)