[Idr] Fwd: [URGENT AND IMPORTANT] IETF WG last call
Clarence Filsfils <cfilsfil@cisco.com> Fri, 24 March 2017 19:25 UTC
Return-Path: <cfilsfil@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7815E129426 for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 24 Mar 2017 12:25:51 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.523
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.523 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id uEiehkznLgyP for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 24 Mar 2017 12:25:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from aer-iport-4.cisco.com (aer-iport-4.cisco.com [173.38.203.54]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A25BA1293F3 for <idr@ietf.org>; Fri, 24 Mar 2017 12:25:49 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=525; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1490383549; x=1491593149; h=subject:references:to:from:message-id:date:mime-version: in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=WUOD8aUQlm/Rwpoe7qhuQTGWwk9rtUrL8dANapd5p7o=; b=blN575eulJKn1bVFybBwxSE5sLDzOAs6KaRgMICYh1b/qsAar1NAZARd Gv2hRMfA9fMm8BF29FPGB3OpCwT3dpk6NWHyZ7Q1MLSILrqGpPuFVyKx2 FBf4WGPS6su2Nhh9I7DvsFSeGKw6PX0bDhgr8LKoqas7svbjJwRUk2rNM c=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0CUAQB4ctVY/xbLJq1dGQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBBwEBAQEBhUCDYooPc5BckzqCD4IOhiICg2gYAQIBAQEBAQEBayiFFQEBAgIBIxVGCxwDAQIDAiYCAk0CCAcMBgIBAYl2BQiqRIImikUBAQEBAQEEAQEBAQEBAQEggQuFQ4IFgmqHWoJfBZAdjDySS4FkiHaGVotPgz+EVx84gQQ6HxVIgVuCdh2BZD81iW4BAQE
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.36,216,1486425600"; d="scan'208";a="653503949"
Received: from aer-iport-nat.cisco.com (HELO aer-core-1.cisco.com) ([173.38.203.22]) by aer-iport-4.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 24 Mar 2017 19:25:23 +0000
Received: from [10.61.255.175] ([10.61.255.175]) by aer-core-1.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id v2OJPNue007140; Fri, 24 Mar 2017 19:25:23 GMT
References: <6F5424A0-C324-4F39-AE4D-2A2B2A72E13A@cisco.com>
To: shares@ndzh.com, idr@ietf.org
From: Clarence Filsfils <cfilsfil@cisco.com>
X-Forwarded-Message-Id: <6F5424A0-C324-4F39-AE4D-2A2B2A72E13A@cisco.com>
Message-ID: <2d6899bd-5ce6-47aa-3c33-09f8242f364a@cisco.com>
Date: Fri, 24 Mar 2017 18:46:58 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.7.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <6F5424A0-C324-4F39-AE4D-2A2B2A72E13A@cisco.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/idr/oMm1ZcdcjaqcGXzbDbgilmdf3XE>
Subject: [Idr] Fwd: [URGENT AND IMPORTANT] IETF WG last call
X-BeenThere: idr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing <idr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/idr/>
List-Post: <mailto:idr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 24 Mar 2017 19:25:51 -0000
I support as co-author. Cheers, Clarence > From: "Susan Hares" <shares@ndzh.com> > To: "'idr wg'" <idr@ietf.org> > Date: Tue, 21 Mar 2017 12:53:14 -0400 > Subject: Re: [Idr] 2 Week WG LC for draft-ietf-idr-bgp-prefix-sid-04.txt - > 3/6 to 3/20/2017 - extending to 3/31 > > > IDR WG: > > > > Perhaps the WG LC came at a bad time since have received only 1 response. > We will length the call to 3/31. Unless with have substantial input, this > WG LC will not indicate consensus. > > > > Sue Hares
- [Idr] Fwd: [URGENT AND IMPORTANT] IETF WG last ca… Clarence Filsfils
- Re: [Idr] Fwd: [URGENT AND IMPORTANT] IETF WG las… Rajiv Asati (rajiva)
- Re: [Idr] Fwd: [URGENT AND IMPORTANT] IETF WG las… Gaurav Dawra (gdawra)
- Re: [Idr] Fwd: [URGENT AND IMPORTANT] IETF WG las… Mohan Nanduri