Re: [ietf-smtp] Per-Recipient Data Responses
Brandon Long <blong@google.com> Wed, 05 March 2014 19:18 UTC
Return-Path: <blong@google.com>
X-Original-To: ietf-smtp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf-smtp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4FF441A0186 for <ietf-smtp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 5 Mar 2014 11:18:09 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.926
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.926 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.547, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id gC2KcUzLjjiB for <ietf-smtp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 5 Mar 2014 11:18:07 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-ie0-x22f.google.com (mail-ie0-x22f.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c03::22f]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D8CE1A0175 for <ietf-smtp@ietf.org>; Wed, 5 Mar 2014 11:18:07 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-ie0-f175.google.com with SMTP id to1so1508357ieb.6 for <ietf-smtp@ietf.org>; Wed, 05 Mar 2014 11:18:03 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=L01Ky2szvxD/4LXI8Z7ZimFKlIpnSP/Cowh+aXzOMjE=; b=lD7mxdQvVdNmH2YpiWyQV93ZfSituG91KXDuqYHIkOXrIyBsvdb1mDXBFcrLHrciJ+ ZTo0aXBuN6ovT+a7ZRYn81UmqBY00B59EQiptISKrlXrA/75y9r0feVwXGlX7pgFrUOb +0+YuJe/x9FsJ8oJL8XAQyp0+Wm0rtHzgaKimi03VZmvVHdc8hsxEGYbrcYejs14YqlU l7HsD6ZZ+UjzMpYwV9OUbAnOX4j2c+rsjqq9GjdLQsR1+OHpurFSt4PPY6Awe/Ki5Lsy LY725D57iWm0jhB6H9C1HHPYkP6ELgv3iSk29+x6F6pSBwOlN0wy7mn/nWZ5X59U9brJ WxPw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=L01Ky2szvxD/4LXI8Z7ZimFKlIpnSP/Cowh+aXzOMjE=; b=YeCPEXfsLeR6XcXbCWoZ6bl5kJf8XRpuWqLhamfgkeWoKxEY10m/G7ApEBCIHiIxVf 3aQ/TJR8EFNsVA85pkqw1CMBYwUZuMiaQjitTDQ4ceqBoDQLLOTHdM+GSTeCe6b0OP5P LbfX9ZTcOAfTyATuh0gmRWcMIYZIbJVGG9m/yhO3HZvfVjSnv7cawPJcpB2OGBD9zP1c mijo977CMC70L88D7R99raMA34h0sJtuXniRIbOirNyHd3IH7+e/ABPW2FSPL86u3E++ ueR/hBtlURKwE4/znPH2h7t70J4rLleju04Jsu2CrKTL2qAXbyrGOpA1S4uVoi8iwqpG cCkA==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQnFe41DWR7Aj98rMi7k1Z2jHyjxYjHOZd8g4G5HqR9rJyH48wF938Uok4H5ge9q1eyJ/q0US7Cp5E/xfNeZ6oVfsbYSJcGJoyrFQAgSrIjgz6VEfeYcFowAYVHYRHLEdBCwyUDcH/rkFELBggVpunLC9fBIbvkhno4DsafxULEt8IQxRGmXYDf8FknG66VN5AdDFkYG
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.43.90.202 with SMTP id bj10mr6115457icc.48.1394047083734; Wed, 05 Mar 2014 11:18:03 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.64.251.132 with HTTP; Wed, 5 Mar 2014 11:18:03 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <20140305185605.GA20951@x2.esmtp.org>
References: <CAL0qLwYUv=MZuk6Qcjsmu5up4b-TfyK5nQKYwWT=bxKnAt3_2g@mail.gmail.com> <20140305185605.GA20951@x2.esmtp.org>
Date: Wed, 05 Mar 2014 11:18:03 -0800
Message-ID: <CABa8R6vLRKoD13QmT-38PdMEg+F8iF2M=zn1NRSmwONdUbeQbg@mail.gmail.com>
From: Brandon Long <blong@google.com>
To: ietf-smtp <ietf-smtp@ietf.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf-smtp/AjjDqiiUK33cbvgC_2jcIEg5VPg
Subject: Re: [ietf-smtp] Per-Recipient Data Responses
X-BeenThere: ietf-smtp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discussion of issues related to Simple Mail Transfer Protocol \(SMTP\) \[RFC 821, RFC 2821, RFC 5321\]" <ietf-smtp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf-smtp>, <mailto:ietf-smtp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf-smtp/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-smtp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-smtp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-smtp>, <mailto:ietf-smtp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 05 Mar 2014 19:18:09 -0000
On Wed, Mar 5, 2014 at 10:56 AM, Claus Assmann <ietf-smtp@esmtp.org> wrote: > On Wed, Mar 05, 2014, Murray S. Kucherawy wrote: >> How come this never got adoption? It comes up from time to time in "We > > It has been "adopted": MeTA1 and exim implement it. Maybe someone > needs to "push" it through the IETF process? It must not be enabled by default, since I only saw about 5 MXs yesterday that are advertising PRDR. Brandon
- [ietf-smtp] Per-Recipient Data Responses Murray S. Kucherawy
- Re: [ietf-smtp] Per-Recipient Data Responses Claus Assmann
- Re: [ietf-smtp] Per-Recipient Data Responses Alexey Melnikov
- Re: [ietf-smtp] Per-Recipient Data Responses Brandon Long
- Re: [ietf-smtp] Per-Recipient Data Responses Murray S. Kucherawy
- Re: [ietf-smtp] Per-Recipient Data Responses Дилян Палаузов
- Re: [ietf-smtp] Per-Recipient Data Responses Brandon Long
- Re: [ietf-smtp] Per-Recipient Data Responses Murray S. Kucherawy
- Re: [ietf-smtp] Per-Recipient Data Responses Tony Finch
- Re: [ietf-smtp] Per-Recipient Data Responses Paul Smith
- Re: [ietf-smtp] Per-Recipient Data Responses Gilles Chehade
- Re: [ietf-smtp] Per-Recipient Data Responses Ned Freed
- Re: [ietf-smtp] Per-Recipient Data Responses Paul Smith
- Re: [ietf-smtp] Per-Recipient Data Responses Gilles Chehade
- Re: [ietf-smtp] Per-Recipient Data Responses Steve Atkins
- Re: [ietf-smtp] Per-Recipient Data Responses Brandon Long
- Re: [ietf-smtp] Per-Recipient Data Responses Carl S. Gutekunst
- Re: [ietf-smtp] Per-Recipient Data Responses Ned Freed
- Re: [ietf-smtp] Per-Recipient Data Responses Tony Finch
- Re: [ietf-smtp] Per-Recipient Data Responses Ned Freed
- Re: [ietf-smtp] Per-Recipient Data Responses Carl S. Gutekunst
- Re: [ietf-smtp] Per-Recipient Data Responses Paul Smith
- Re: [ietf-smtp] Per-Recipient Data Responses Sabahattin Gucukoglu
- Re: [ietf-smtp] Per-Recipient Data Responses Carl S. Gutekunst
- Re: [ietf-smtp] Per-Recipient Data Responses Paul Smith
- Re: [ietf-smtp] Per-Recipient Data Responses Sabahattin Gucukoglu
- Re: [ietf-smtp] Per-Recipient Data Responses Ned Freed
- Re: [ietf-smtp] Per-Recipient Data Responses Paul Smith
- Re: [ietf-smtp] Per-Recipient Data Responses Steve Atkins
- Re: [ietf-smtp] Per-Recipient Data Responses Carl S. Gutekunst
- Re: [ietf-smtp] Per-Recipient Data Responses Tony Finch
- Re: [ietf-smtp] Per-Recipient Data Responses Paul Smith
- Re: [ietf-smtp] Per-Recipient Data Responses Ned Freed
- Re: [ietf-smtp] Per-Recipient Data Responses Ned Freed
- Re: [ietf-smtp] Per-Recipient Data Responses Peter J. Holzer
- Re: [ietf-smtp] Per-Recipient Data Responses Alessandro Vesely
- Re: [ietf-smtp] Per-Recipient Data Responses Murray S. Kucherawy
- Re: [ietf-smtp] Per-Recipient Data Responses Ned Freed
- Re: [ietf-smtp] Per-Recipient Data Responses Дилян Палаузов
- Re: [ietf-smtp] Per-Recipient Data Responses Brandon Long
- Re: [ietf-smtp] Per-Recipient Data Responses Ned Freed
- Re: [ietf-smtp] Per-Recipient Data Responses Alessandro Vesely
- Re: [ietf-smtp] Per-Recipient Data Responses Ned Freed
- Re: [ietf-smtp] Per-Recipient Data Responses Alessandro Vesely
- Re: [ietf-smtp] Per-Recipient Data Responses John C Klensin
- Re: [ietf-smtp] Per-Recipient Data Responses Alessandro Vesely
- Re: [ietf-smtp] Per-Recipient Data Responses John Levine
- Re: [ietf-smtp] Per-Recipient Data Responses Ned Freed
- Re: [ietf-smtp] Per-Recipient Data Responses Robert A. Rosenberg
- Re: [ietf-smtp] Per-Recipient Data Responses Robert A. Rosenberg
- Re: [ietf-smtp] Per-Recipient Data Responses John R Levine
- Re: [ietf-smtp] Per-Recipient Data Responses Russ Allbery
- Re: [ietf-smtp] Per-Recipient Data Responses and … Alessandro Vesely