Is there: Discussions, Evaluations, Decisions, Acceptance, Progress?
Abdussalam Baryun <abdussalambaryun@gmail.com> Fri, 24 August 2012 11:43 UTC
Return-Path: <abdussalambaryun@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4EF0D21F8692 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 24 Aug 2012 04:43:59 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.492
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.492 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.106, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id fkEPY9gKgbqk for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 24 Aug 2012 04:43:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-vb0-f44.google.com (mail-vb0-f44.google.com [209.85.212.44]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 91CB121F8683 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Fri, 24 Aug 2012 04:43:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by vbbez10 with SMTP id ez10so2156262vbb.31 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Fri, 24 Aug 2012 04:43:58 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=A5g5STn+rq8+eqQuVRFpq4SQkuizICTOqIyhCjYQ9uU=; b=u6nK7uxaNdfBV8kDLLwXjGwdU9Biuw0fpOZ3Mzmj+0mdbfAVzLQ8milsLH2JrR5V1r Y3JGaF5xzE6vEoafVj/R1dpxlnWa2cx2PxN1zt6pdBS0QB8uQh66lvCTCmIamyME6fU6 gey7XLLWGFf7siveSnAPxvf51SGroabpV9VfPFiUeUk/aw4S7lQr72Q1qlReaWVrz/Ip ToVM2CH7VncD8L+QWyG81GrYy7sQGOIih5GKMNcAhs4g/uT1mBoQRUXfLV0QqIOtqXra ZWaynRnBAWbQR4QlE0ZeRtyHMW0zWM3y1o5t/64nOwYADMcxi0wuTNTkS48gkD5bdaVG a2qw==
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.220.37.194 with SMTP id y2mr3389076vcd.44.1345808637955; Fri, 24 Aug 2012 04:43:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.220.55.9 with HTTP; Fri, 24 Aug 2012 04:43:57 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2012 12:43:57 +0100
Message-ID: <CADnDZ8_AeRwe0sDe1a-rCZyG6s0X-hNN7T-qHz0-Ay33C_OZvQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Is there: Discussions, Evaluations, Decisions, Acceptance, Progress?
From: Abdussalam Baryun <abdussalambaryun@gmail.com>
To: ietf <ietf@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="bcaec54eea8ecd0ce304c8017d13"
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2012 11:43:59 -0000
Hi All, For any IETF WG discussion, we recommend reasons/references and equal recognistion for progress. For any IETF WG evaluation/review, we recommend two way discussions for progress. For any IETF WG decision, we recommend evaluation and then need rough consensus for progress. For any IESG decision, we recommend WG input and internet community input and their consensus. IMO, for any IETF-Participant's progress, he/she needs to know *why* through discussions/questions, and he/she should make *decisions* for the WG's I-Ds/RFCs with his/her community through rough consensus. Decisions are accepted by community only if they are discussed or they have clear reasons. Please advise if you agree/disagree, thanks, Best Regards AB
- Is there: Discussions, Evaluations, Decisions, Ac… Abdussalam Baryun
- Re: Is there: Discussions, Evaluations, Decisions… Abdussalam Baryun