RE: Rude responses (Was: Last Call: <draft-ietf-spfbis-4408bis-19.txt> (Sender Policy Framework (SPF) for Authorizing Use of Domains in Email, Version 1) to Proposed Standard)

<l.wood@surrey.ac.uk> Fri, 23 August 2013 00:56 UTC

Return-Path: <l.wood@surrey.ac.uk>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E48F811E82B3 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 22 Aug 2013 17:56:59 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.598
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.598 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY=0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id OfHUXtWDRqDx for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 22 Aug 2013 17:56:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail1.bemta3.messagelabs.com (mail1.bemta3.messagelabs.com [195.245.230.161]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F1D4E11E82AB for <ietf@ietf.org>; Thu, 22 Aug 2013 17:56:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [195.245.230.131:26198] by server-1.bemta-3.messagelabs.com id 4D/44-17041-253B6125; Fri, 23 Aug 2013 00:56:50 +0000
X-Env-Sender: l.wood@surrey.ac.uk
X-Msg-Ref: server-6.tower-78.messagelabs.com!1377219410!33293621!1
X-Originating-IP: [131.227.200.39]
X-StarScan-Received:
X-StarScan-Version: 6.9.11; banners=-,-,-
X-VirusChecked: Checked
Received: (qmail 10080 invoked from network); 23 Aug 2013 00:56:50 -0000
Received: from exht012p.surrey.ac.uk (HELO EXHT012P.surrey.ac.uk) (131.227.200.39) by server-6.tower-78.messagelabs.com with AES128-SHA encrypted SMTP; 23 Aug 2013 00:56:50 -0000
Received: from EXMB01CMS.surrey.ac.uk ([169.254.1.180]) by EXHT012P.surrey.ac.uk ([131.227.200.39]) with mapi; Fri, 23 Aug 2013 01:56:49 +0100
From: l.wood@surrey.ac.uk
To: stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie
Date: Fri, 23 Aug 2013 01:52:54 +0100
Subject: RE: Rude responses (Was: Last Call: <draft-ietf-spfbis-4408bis-19.txt> (Sender Policy Framework (SPF) for Authorizing Use of Domains in Email, Version 1) to Proposed Standard)
Thread-Topic: Rude responses (Was: Last Call: <draft-ietf-spfbis-4408bis-19.txt> (Sender Policy Framework (SPF) for Authorizing Use of Domains in Email, Version 1) to Proposed Standard)
Thread-Index: Ac6evXL+5OdJwJ8eTGG3fD6Ew9KUsQA3ablQ
Message-ID: <290E20B455C66743BE178C5C84F124082240607509@EXMB01CMS.surrey.ac.uk>
References: <20130819150521.GB21088@besserwisser.org> <20130819160549.61542.qmail@joyce.lan> <20130819190533.GA30516@besserwisser.org> <4751241.GTNxysAlzm@scott-latitude-e6320> <B443E973-858A-4958-964B-B0F0FBDF5A7A@virtualized.org> <CAMm+LwhcHOeUv0iqZmZ6wX-jOD1r-mRR0x8sbxaKrsU3k4CNBQ@mail.gmail.com> <20130821040003.GL607@mx1.yitter.info> <64700EE4-85B3-4179-904A-885770C6BBF4@virtualized.org> <7F8D4DA5-F80B-432B-8231-5B40ADB61783@frobbit.se> <521495EB.7060207@cisco.com> <1C40FB10-3705-4E80-8DEB-D14B63D24C97@frobbit.se> <5214A593.8030907@cisco.com> <E3B3B6B0-F17F-44D0-ACD1-53BDBAC6F2CB@frobbit.se> <5214F97B.2080400@dcrocker.net> <6D6829DE-1242-4877-BB5E-8ECD08D88CB2@frobbit.se> <52150722.1070307@dcrocker.net> <52150DF0.6070800@qti.qualcomm.com> <5215123E.5080203@dcrocker.net> <52151903.4030402@qti.qualcomm.com> <521533DB.4040001@dcrocker.net> <CAC4RtVDM4N9=cGyP+RGkv39=qBuJN04PLUubHMwUDfsqM7uJng@mail.gmail.com>, <52153E42.1090703@cs.tcd.ie>
In-Reply-To: <52153E42.1090703@cs.tcd.ie>
Accept-Language: en-US, en-GB
Content-Language: en-GB
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
acceptlanguage: en-US, en-GB
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Cc: ietf@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 23 Aug 2013 00:57:00 -0000

> I can't myself think of a good justification for sarcasm, (well, maybe [1]:-)

good sarcasm is like good protocol design - many can recognise it, some can appreciate it, few can truly understand its nuances, and even fewer can create it.

You're just not one of them.

Lloyd Wood
http://sat-net.com/L.Wood/