IETF Logo Mail Archive

[Int-area] Continuing IPv10 I-D discussion.

Khaled Omar <eng.khaled.omar@hotmail.com> Thu, 30 March 2017 13:16 UTC

Return-Path: <eng.khaled.omar@hotmail.com>
X-Original-To: int-area@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: int-area@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 938B41296AA for <int-area@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 30 Mar 2017 06:16:51 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.046
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.046 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, FORGED_HOTMAIL_RCVD2=0.874, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id NvsOVxbYSt4Y for <int-area@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 30 Mar 2017 06:16:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from EUR02-HE1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-oln040092068054.outbound.protection.outlook.com [40.92.68.54]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5AC7A1294AF for <int-area@ietf.org>; Thu, 30 Mar 2017 06:16:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from HE1EUR02FT013.eop-EUR02.prod.protection.outlook.com (10.152.10.51) by HE1EUR02HT118.eop-EUR02.prod.protection.outlook.com (10.152.10.176) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA384_P384) id 15.1.1005.5; Thu, 30 Mar 2017 13:16:46 +0000
Received: from AM4PR0401MB2241.eurprd04.prod.outlook.com (10.152.10.56) by HE1EUR02FT013.mail.protection.outlook.com (10.152.10.93) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA384_P384) id 15.1.1005.5 via Frontend Transport; Thu, 30 Mar 2017 13:16:46 +0000
Received: from AM4PR0401MB2241.eurprd04.prod.outlook.com ([10.165.44.150]) by AM4PR0401MB2241.eurprd04.prod.outlook.com ([10.165.44.150]) with mapi id 15.01.0991.022; Thu, 30 Mar 2017 13:16:46 +0000
From: Khaled Omar <eng.khaled.omar@hotmail.com>
To: "int-area@ietf.org" <int-area@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: Continuing IPv10 I-D discussion.
Thread-Index: AdKpViCv4ucVibQQSyGDqyi2P9NswA==
Date: Thu, 30 Mar 2017 13:16:46 +0000
Message-ID: <AM4PR0401MB2241D42F2FDC359193FD6B80BD340@AM4PR0401MB2241.eurprd04.prod.outlook.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
authentication-results: ietf.org; dkim=none (message not signed) header.d=none;ietf.org; dmarc=none action=none header.from=hotmail.com;
x-incomingtopheadermarker: OriginalChecksum:E5BBC5F39B53E0ECF7801D548BCDAB0BCCEE85BB8EBE6922E6C9E0C2BEE74F4C; UpperCasedChecksum:C71EDB1C79E71531123F4D264C34B7038C47C373AFE0EF424EF4F6BEA5D38EEA; SizeAsReceived:8037; Count:40
x-tmn: [mcUdiRGd8glV3oJKS1zRvllHBcG0Wqz2]
x-microsoft-exchange-diagnostics: 1; HE1EUR02HT118; 5:0WLYG1z//5PcacHG7dLJMVXPhvQGMXFjyP4mvJjyksJaymq69QHdeoR8rjNj+eisGOv1TvdrQqNZWjm6FxyPeOt7qx7UwPi+fj6sjPd5pX8D7CFt5LlU8spwh6O2AyT6v1cbonfBUiXFGcJXJ79R1w==; 24:+sTPnt+kvgU7UaznTwuGQF4sn1djxqJdXoQ64k8YR6GjRaGiM9LhTNn1bLih1Ta0+Zv10nTGlKEcw82XR7o5ZLXH7sP/VuZX+na95tnuVHM=; 7:viUB3rJ2Dplv92Kxs1Q1DpB7Ej5W3qcatyBvWSd6S2Y/ZFI2WGJaZc94MiTFd20egMrGRqEotLiOpGd53me5hfLmes7PhXpoK6GDmVaBlOTROu3FpBytep3Dh0F5lW1U/0NO0sxd/KFM+oVpTGQkE/0Aenfkhd9I3Ggep8KTDkVpohSyxQXFobQ68txO7aO5IMNWMBOnf9d5iciREu/XJnRlrWNmU95/g307q9nYIQY3736sWiof66C6PPmNiaf7O4P3bYVe+EAjUx/PUiwMB6rs8GkOIBM4p5lkcl19KvIRe5y0nguBcYahOZIhkxxc
x-incomingheadercount: 40
x-eopattributedmessage: 0
x-forefront-antispam-report: EFV:NLI; SFV:NSPM; SFS:(7070007)(98901004); DIR:OUT; SFP:1901; SCL:1; SRVR:HE1EUR02HT118; H:AM4PR0401MB2241.eurprd04.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; SPF:None; LANG:en;
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: 358c21a8-6a3f-4d0d-8ad0-08d4776f045d
x-microsoft-antispam: UriScan:; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(22001)(201702061074)(5061506573)(5061507331)(1603103135)(2017031320274)(2017031322274)(1601125374)(1603101448)(1701031045); SRVR:HE1EUR02HT118;
x-exchange-antispam-report-cfa-test: BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(444000031); SRVR:HE1EUR02HT118; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:; SRVR:HE1EUR02HT118;
x-forefront-prvs: 02622CEF0A
spamdiagnosticoutput: 1:99
spamdiagnosticmetadata: NSPM
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_AM4PR0401MB2241D42F2FDC359193FD6B80BD340AM4PR0401MB2241_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OriginatorOrg: hotmail.com
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 30 Mar 2017 13:16:46.2755 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Internet
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 84df9e7f-e9f6-40af-b435-aaaaaaaaaaaa
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: HE1EUR02HT118
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/int-area/KiI8pVYAJ6FGg22LS4caPCR2uOw>
Subject: [Int-area] Continuing IPv10 I-D discussion.
X-BeenThere: int-area@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Internet Area Mailing List <int-area.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/int-area>, <mailto:int-area-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/int-area/>
List-Post: <mailto:int-area@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:int-area-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-area>, <mailto:int-area-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 30 Mar 2017 13:16:52 -0000

Hello,

Let's continue the IPv10 I-D discussion here as there was no opportunity to discuss it at the IETF 98 as it was clear in front of all of you that there were technical issues related to remote participation.

I think all of you now know about IPv10 and what is the problem and how IPv10 can solve it and how it can be deployed in a short time.

You can ask any question and I'll do my best to give you answers to make it clear for everyone so the IPv10 I-D can go forward through the IETF standardization process and be published.

All of you know that the migration process to IPv6 took longer than we expected and we shouldn't keep waiting more than that after the depletion of the IPv4 address space.

If there is a better solution for this problem I can participate freely on its discussion.

Best regards,

Khaled Omar

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email