Introducing draft-6man-addresspartnaming
Richard Hartmann <richih.mailinglist@gmail.com> Thu, 07 April 2011 20:05 UTC
Return-Path: <richih.mailinglist@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ipv6@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipv6@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5DD043A6980 for <ipv6@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 7 Apr 2011 13:05:47 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.687
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.687 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.087, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id bXpnCH9oIOF2 for <ipv6@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 7 Apr 2011 13:05:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-iw0-f172.google.com (mail-iw0-f172.google.com [209.85.214.172]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 88CEA3A690A for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Thu, 7 Apr 2011 13:05:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by iwn39 with SMTP id 39so3487391iwn.31 for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Thu, 07 Apr 2011 13:07:31 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type; bh=S0Xt4cUxlYbyezl/rlaXkEGjQhgrUQSEgMFtgwFEizI=; b=aZ0ilNgXCgYB9L/AZ2BsmNvnvLMF+BNeqlcyz4yrgfqcB0AS6ugr0YpDv1sIYrxvDa bd6Dnz+d+KkxrE9Z3V2sX9xSQN8kHeCYnPhA2HlRRZnQSQho727EBVIRRkHt61lFXNNJ 5NYKxWA+7XoPK0n1777DeuWwcpXk6Ar4Y35eE=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to:content-type; b=BBffi6kfH1DVG/et88+WjPUMcbheO280JKDG7d5xoBDBK0nbupTvb5uWMPs6jsr21R 714leaIyfwqFrHZuZ5t6+bAo/zDH0IKSA3OimhBriTwaeBaCojfXTCogeLEiFT/g2nR2 oxz0DH2vJYmEvtvxirPuDS8Ps2YF0D7ae4Meg=
Received: by 10.231.18.220 with SMTP id x28mr1254319iba.185.1302206851125; Thu, 07 Apr 2011 13:07:31 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.231.92.16 with HTTP; Thu, 7 Apr 2011 13:07:11 -0700 (PDT)
From: Richard Hartmann <richih.mailinglist@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 07 Apr 2011 22:07:11 +0200
Message-ID: <BANLkTik=FRQyL8HpH_OCVv+xnVbv9MO5Fg@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Introducing draft-6man-addresspartnaming
To: 6man List <ipv6@ietf.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ipv6>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 07 Apr 2011 20:05:47 -0000
Dear all, Fred Baker asked me to move draft-denog-v6ops-addresspartnaming-04 [1] to 6man. Thus, we are reintroducing it as draft-6man-addresspartnaming-00 without changing anything in the actual text. The DENOG reference has been removed for internal and political reasons but this ID still stems from within part of the community calling itself DENOG and enjoys broad support. draft-6man-addresspartnaming-00 has been uploaded, but it's not released yet as the secretary still needs to make manual changes to document the transition properly. Anyway, after a long time of gathering feedback, we have boiled down the options to hextet and quibble. quibble remains in there mostly for historic reasons and to gather additional feedback. I do not think suggesting two separate terms is useful in the least and we hope to get input on this. The main problem with it is that quibble is overloaded in English and in a negative way. My money is on consensus evolving to drop it in -01. The second question on my mind is if using MUST for hextet is appropriate. Using SHOULD is fine as well though I personally think MUST is better to avoid any and all potential confusion. We are really looking forward to any and all feedback, this issue might not seem to be important at first, but many/most people tend to reconsider after some thinking, thanks, Richard Hartmann [1] http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-denog-v6ops-addresspartnaming-04
- Re: Introducing draft-6man-addresspartnaming Scott Schmit
- Introducing draft-6man-addresspartnaming Richard Hartmann
- Re: Introducing draft-6man-addresspartnaming Bob Hinden
- Re: Introducing draft-6man-addresspartnaming Richard Hartmann
- Re: Introducing draft-6man-addresspartnaming Karl Auer
- Re: Introducing draft-6man-addresspartnaming Richard Hartmann
- Re: Introducing draft-6man-addresspartnaming Karl Auer
- Re: Introducing draft-6man-addresspartnaming Richard Hartmann
- Re: Introducing draft-6man-addresspartnaming Tim Chown
- Re: Introducing draft-6man-addresspartnaming james woodyatt
- Re: Introducing draft-6man-addresspartnaming Scott Brim
- Re: Introducing draft-6man-addresspartnaming Richard Hartmann
- RE: Introducing draft-6man-addresspartnaming Manfredi, Albert E
- Re: Introducing draft-6man-addresspartnaming Richard Hartmann
- Re: Introducing draft-6man-addresspartnaming Doug Barton
- Re: Introducing draft-6man-addresspartnaming Scott Schmit
- Re: Introducing draft-6man-addresspartnaming Richard Hartmann
- RE: Introducing draft-6man-addresspartnaming Manfredi, Albert E
- RE: Introducing draft-6man-addresspartnaming Guillaume.Leclanche
- Re: Introducing draft-6man-addresspartnaming Jared Mauch