jmap Discussion Archive - Date Index
[Prev Page] [Next Page] [Thread Index]
[IETF Mailing List Directory]
[jmap List Information]
- Mar 22 2018
- Re: [Jmap] New draft: JMAP IMAPDATA,
Bron Gondwana
- Re: [Jmap] Comment on draft-ietf-jmap-core-04,
Neil Jenkins
- Re: [Jmap] New draft: JMAP IMAPDATA,
Ted Lemon
- [Jmap] Comment on draft-ietf-jmap-core-04,
Alexey Melnikov
- Re: [Jmap] {SPAM} Re: New draft: JMAP IMAPDATA,
Bron Gondwana
- Re: [Jmap] {SPAM} Re: New draft: JMAP IMAPDATA,
Dave Richards
- Re: [Jmap] New draft: JMAP IMAPDATA,
Bron Gondwana
- Re: [Jmap] New draft: JMAP IMAPDATA,
Dave Richards
- Re: [Jmap] New draft: JMAP IMAPDATA,
Bron Gondwana
- Re: [Jmap] New draft: JMAP IMAPDATA,
Ted Lemon
- Re: [Jmap] New draft: JMAP IMAPDATA,
Alexey Melnikov
- Re: [Jmap] New draft: JMAP IMAPDATA,
Dave Richards
- Mar 21 2018
- Mar 19 2018
- Mar 09 2018
- Mar 09 2018
- Mar 07 2018
- Mar 06 2018
- Mar 05 2018
- Mar 02 2018
- Mar 01 2018
- Feb 27 2018
- Feb 19 2018
- Feb 12 2018
- Feb 09 2018
- Feb 07 2018
- Jan 31 2018
- Jan 30 2018
- Jan 28 2018
- Jan 11 2018
- Dec 22 2017
- Re: [Jmap] Decoding of unknown headers,
Arnt Gulbrandsen
- Re: [Jmap] Decoding of unknown headers,
Arnt Gulbrandsen
- Re: [Jmap] Decoding of unknown headers,
ajay
- Re: [Jmap] Decoding of unknown headers,
Arnt Gulbrandsen
- Re: [Jmap] Decoding of unknown headers,
ajay
- Re: [Jmap] Decoding of unknown headers,
Alexey Melnikov
- Re: [Jmap] Decoding of unknown headers,
ajay
- Re: [Jmap] Decoding of unknown headers,
Alexey Melnikov
- Re: [Jmap] Destroying mailboxes: how this affects messages,
Alexey Melnikov
- Re: [Jmap] JMAP Core,
Alexey Melnikov
- Dec 13 2017
- Dec 07 2017
- Dec 07 2017
- Dec 04 2017
- Dec 03 2017
- Nov 29 2017
- Nov 28 2017
- Nov 28 2017
- Nov 27 2017
- Nov 16 2017
- Nov 16 2017
- Nov 15 2017
- Nov 14 2017
- Nov 13 2017
- Re: [Jmap] [JMAP] SMIME Attachments (was: Re: S/MIME for JMAP),
vaibhav singh
- Re: [Jmap] Jmap Digest, Vol 12, Issue 1,
vaibhav singh
- [Jmap] hasAttachment vs. keywords,
Josef 'Jeff' Sipek
- Re: [Jmap] [JMAP] SMIME Attachments (was: Re: S/MIME for JMAP),
Josef 'Jeff' Sipek
- Re: [Jmap] Jmap Digest, Vol 12, Issue 1,
Josef 'Jeff' Sipek
- [Jmap] MessageSubmission: removing of answered and forwarded flags handling,
Raphael OUAZANA
- Re: [Jmap] Jmap Digest, Vol 12, Issue 1,
vaibhav singh
- Nov 11 2017
- Oct 29 2017
- Oct 29 2017
- Oct 25 2017
- Oct 24 2017
- Oct 20 2017
- Oct 15 2017
- Oct 10 2017
- Oct 02 2017
- Oct 02 2017
- Oct 01 2017
- Sep 17 2017
- Sep 12 2017
- Sep 12 2017
- Sep 11 2017
- Sep 10 2017
- Sep 09 2017
- Sep 06 2017
- Re: [Jmap] blob API in draft-ietf-jmap-{core,mail}-01,
Ted Lemon
- Re: [Jmap] blob API in draft-ietf-jmap-{core,mail}-01,
Bron Gondwana
- Re: [Jmap] blob API in draft-ietf-jmap-{core,mail}-01,
Ted Lemon
- Re: [Jmap] blob API in draft-ietf-jmap-{core,mail}-01,
Josef 'Jeff' Sipek
- Re: [Jmap] blob API in draft-ietf-jmap-{core,mail}-01,
Josef 'Jeff' Sipek
- Re: [Jmap] blob API in draft-ietf-jmap-{core,mail}-01,
Ted Lemon
- Re: [Jmap] blob API in draft-ietf-jmap-{core,mail}-01,
Neil Jenkins
- Sep 05 2017
- Re: [Jmap] blob API in draft-ietf-jmap-{core,mail}-01,
Ted Lemon
- Re: [Jmap] Destroying mailboxes: how this affects messages,
Ted Lemon
- Re: [Jmap] Destroying mailboxes: how this affects messages,
Arnt Gulbrandsen
- Re: [Jmap] Destroying mailboxes: how this affects messages,
Neil Jenkins
- Re: [Jmap] Destroying mailboxes: how this affects messages,
Benoît TELLIER
- Re: [Jmap] blob API in draft-ietf-jmap-{core,mail}-01,
Josef 'Jeff' Sipek
- Re: [Jmap] Destroying mailboxes: how this affects messages,
Ted Lemon
- Re: [Jmap] Destroying mailboxes: how this affects messages,
Neil Jenkins
- Sep 04 2017
- Re: [Jmap] Destroying mailboxes: how this affects messages,
Ted Lemon
- Re: [Jmap] Destroying mailboxes: how this affects messages,
Arnt Gulbrandsen
- Re: [Jmap] Destroying mailboxes: how this affects messages,
Ted Lemon
- Re: [Jmap] Destroying mailboxes: how this affects messages,
Arnt Gulbrandsen
- Re: [Jmap] Destroying mailboxes: how this affects messages,
Bron Gondwana
- Re: [Jmap] blob API in draft-ietf-jmap-{core,mail}-01,
Bron Gondwana
- Re: [Jmap] Destroying mailboxes: how this affects messages,
Ted Lemon
- Re: [Jmap] blob API in draft-ietf-jmap-{core,mail}-01,
Ted Lemon
- Re: [Jmap] blob API in draft-ietf-jmap-{core,mail}-01,
Neil Jenkins
- [Jmap] Destroying mailboxes: how this affects messages,
Neil Jenkins
- Re: [Jmap] blob API in draft-ietf-jmap-{core,mail}-01,
Neil Jenkins
- Re: [Jmap] MessageSubmission last call,
Neil Jenkins
- Aug 31 2017
- Aug 29 2017
- Aug 28 2017
- Aug 15 2017
- Aug 11 2017
- Aug 09 2017
- Aug 08 2017
- Aug 07 2017
- Aug 01 2017
- Jul 31 2017
- Jul 26 2017
- Jul 21 2017
- Jul 19 2017
- Jul 18 2017
- Jul 17 2017
- Jul 16 2017
- Jul 14 2017
- Jul 13 2017
- Jul 09 2017
- Jul 05 2017
- Jul 04 2017
- Jul 03 2017
- Jun 28 2017
- Jun 25 2017
- Jun 23 2017
- Jun 20 2017
- Jun 15 2017
- May 31 2017
- May 08 2017
- May 08 2017
- May 07 2017
- May 05 2017
- May 04 2017
- May 03 2017
- May 01 2017
- May 01 2017
- Apr 27 2017
- Apr 27 2017
- Apr 26 2017
- Re: [Jmap] simpler future release & unsend without outbox (was Re: Best vs Good enough - adoption of JMAP),
Neil Jenkins
- Re: [Jmap] simpler future release & unsend without outbox (was Re: Best vs Good enough - adoption of JMAP),
Adrien de Croy
- Re: [Jmap] Best vs Good enough - adoption of JMAP,
Chris Newman
- Re: [Jmap] simpler future release & unsend without outbox (was Re: Best vs Good enough - adoption of JMAP),
Adrien de Croy
- Re: [Jmap] simpler future release & unsend without outbox (was Re: Best vs Good enough - adoption of JMAP),
Neil Jenkins
- Re: [Jmap] simpler future release & unsend without outbox (was Re: Best vs Good enough - adoption of JMAP),
Neil Jenkins
- Re: [Jmap] Best vs Good enough - adoption of JMAP,
Neil Jenkins
- Re: [Jmap] Submission: options for github issue,
Brandon Long
- Re: [Jmap] Draft messages - mutability,
Brandon Long
- Re: [Jmap] Best vs Good enough - adoption of JMAP,
Brandon Long
- Re: [Jmap] Best vs Good enough - adoption of JMAP,
Brandon Long
- Re: [Jmap] Address Validation (was Re: Submission),
Brandon Long
- Re: [Jmap] Best vs Good enough - adoption of JMAP,
Ned Freed
- Re: [Jmap] simpler future release & unsend without outbox (was Re: Best vs Good enough - adoption of JMAP),
Ted Lemon
- [Jmap] simpler future release & unsend without outbox (was Re: Best vs Good enough - adoption of JMAP),
Chris Newman
- Re: [Jmap] Submission: options for github issue,
Ned Freed
- Re: [Jmap] Submission: options for github issue,
HANSEN, TONY L
- Re: [Jmap] Best vs Good enough - adoption of JMAP,
Ted Lemon
- Re: [Jmap] Best vs Good enough - adoption of JMAP,
Ned Freed
- Re: [Jmap] Best vs Good enough - adoption of JMAP,
Ted Lemon
- Re: [Jmap] Best vs Good enough - adoption of JMAP,
Ted Lemon
- Re: [Jmap] Best vs Good enough - adoption of JMAP,
Ned Freed
- Re: [Jmap] Best vs Good enough - adoption of JMAP,
Bron Gondwana
- Re: [Jmap] Best vs Good enough - adoption of JMAP,
Chris Newman
- Re: [Jmap] Draft messages - mutability,
Neil Jenkins
- Re: [Jmap] Draft messages - mutability,
Ted Lemon
- Re: [Jmap] Draft messages - mutability,
Neil Jenkins
- Apr 25 2017
- Re: [Jmap] Best vs Good enough - adoption of JMAP,
Neil Jenkins
- Re: [Jmap] Best vs Good enough - adoption of JMAP,
Ted Lemon
- Re: [Jmap] Draft messages - mutability,
Bron Gondwana
- Re: [Jmap] Best vs Good enough - adoption of JMAP,
Chris Newman
- Re: [Jmap] Draft messages - mutability,
Stu Brandt
- Re: [Jmap] Draft messages - mutability,
Chris Newman
- Re: [Jmap] Address Validation (was Re: Submission),
Alexey Melnikov
- Re: [Jmap] Address Validation (was Re: Submission),
Paul Smith
- Re: [Jmap] Address Validation (was Re: Submission),
Adrien de Croy
- Re: [Jmap] Address Validation (was Re: Submission),
Paul Smith
- Re: [Jmap] Address Validation (was Re: Submission),
Paul Smith
- Re: [Jmap] Address Validation (was Re: Submission),
Adrien de Croy
- Re: [Jmap] Address Validation (was Re: Submission),
Cyrus Daboo
- Re: [Jmap] Address Validation (was Re: Submission),
Paul Smith
- Re: [Jmap] Address Validation (was Re: Submission),
Cyrus Daboo
- Re: [Jmap] Address Validation (was Re: Submission),
Ted Lemon
- Re: [Jmap] Submission,
John R Levine
- Re: [Jmap] Address Validation (was Re: Submission),
Paul Smith
- Re: [Jmap] Address Validation (was Re: Submission),
Adrien de Croy
- Re: [Jmap] Address Validation (was Re: Submission),
Paul Smith
- Re: [Jmap] Address Validation (was Re: Submission),
Paul Smith
- Re: [Jmap] Submission,
Mads Hjorth
- Re: [Jmap] Submission: options for github issue,
Mads Hjorth
- Re: [Jmap] Best vs Good enough - adoption of JMAP,
Bron Gondwana
- Re: [Jmap] Best vs Good enough - adoption of JMAP,
Bron Gondwana
- Re: [Jmap] Address Validation (was Re: Submission),
Bron Gondwana
- Re: [Jmap] Draft messages - mutability,
Neil Jenkins
- Re: [Jmap] Draft messages - mutability,
Ted Lemon
- Re: [Jmap] Draft messages - mutability,
Neil Jenkins
- Re: [Jmap] Draft messages - mutability,
Chris Newman
- Re: [Jmap] Best vs Good enough - adoption of JMAP,
Chris Newman
- Re: [Jmap] Draft messages - mutability,
Ted Lemon
- Re: [Jmap] Best vs Good enough - adoption of JMAP,
Neil Jenkins
- Re: [Jmap] Best vs Good enough - adoption of JMAP,
Chris Newman
- Re: [Jmap] Draft messages - mutability,
Neil Jenkins
- Re: [Jmap] Best vs Good enough - adoption of JMAP,
Adrien de Croy
- Re: [Jmap] Draft messages - mutability,
Chris Newman
- Re: [Jmap] Best vs Good enough - adoption of JMAP,
Ted Lemon
- Re: [Jmap] Best vs Good enough - adoption of JMAP,
Chris Newman
- Apr 24 2017
- [Jmap] Best vs Good enough - adoption of JMAP,
Adrien de Croy
- Re: [Jmap] Submission: options for github issue,
Adrien de Croy
- Re: [Jmap] Address Validation (was Re: Submission),
Adrien de Croy
- Re: [Jmap] Address Validation (was Re: Submission),
Ted Lemon
- Re: [Jmap] Submission: options for github issue,
Cyrus Daboo
- Re: [Jmap] Submission: options for github issue,
HANSEN, TONY L
- Re: [Jmap] Address Validation (was Re: Submission),
Arnt Gulbrandsen
- Re: [Jmap] sent vs. really sent, was Submission: options for github issue,
John Levine
- Re: [Jmap] Is the group address syntax from RFC5322 really not supported in JMAP?,
John R Levine
- Re: [Jmap] Address Validation (was Re: Submission),
Cyrus Daboo
- Re: [Jmap] Submission: options for github issue,
Cyrus Daboo
- Re: [Jmap] Address Validation (was Re: Submission),
Arnt Gulbrandsen
- Re: [Jmap] Is the group address syntax from RFC5322 really not supported in JMAP?,
Alexey Melnikov
- Re: [Jmap] Is the group address syntax from RFC5322 really not supported in JMAP?,
John Levine
- Re: [Jmap] Address Validation (was Re: Submission),
John Levine
- Re: [Jmap] Address Validation (was Re: Submission),
John Levine
- Re: [Jmap] Submission: options for github issue,
Gren Elliot
- Re: [Jmap] Submission: options for github issue,
Cyrus Daboo
- Re: [Jmap] Address Validation (was Re: Submission),
Arnt Gulbrandsen
- Re: [Jmap] Submission: options for github issue,
Ted Lemon
- Re: [Jmap] Submission: options for github issue,
Cyrus Daboo
- Re: [Jmap] Address Validation (was Re: Submission),
John R Levine
- Re: [Jmap] Submission,
Jeremy Harris
- Re: [Jmap] Submission: options for github issue,
Adrien de Croy
- Re: [Jmap] Submission,
Ned Freed
- Re: [Jmap] Address Validation (was Re: Submission),
Adrien de Croy
- Re: [Jmap] Address Validation (was Re: Submission),
Bron Gondwana
- [Jmap] Draft messages - mutability,
Bron Gondwana
- Re: [Jmap] Address Validation (was Re: Submission),
John Levine
- Re: [Jmap] Submission: options for github issue,
Bron Gondwana
- [Jmap] Submission: options for github issue,
Bron Gondwana
- Re: [Jmap] Submission,
Adrien de Croy
- Re: [Jmap] Address Validation (was Re: Submission),
Bron Gondwana
- Re: [Jmap] Is the group address syntax from RFC5322 really not supported in JMAP?,
Bron Gondwana
- Re: [Jmap] Submission,
Ned Freed
- Re: [Jmap] Submission,
Adrien de Croy
- Re: [Jmap] Submission,
Ned Freed
- Re: [Jmap] Submission,
Adrien de Croy
- Apr 23 2017
- Apr 21 2017
- Re: [Jmap] Message Tracking and JMAP extensibility (was Re: Submission is not hard),
Chris Newman
- Re: [Jmap] Submission,
Chris Newman
- Re: [Jmap] Message Tracking and JMAP extensibility (was Re: Submission is not hard),
Adrien de Croy
- Re: [Jmap] Submission,
Adrien de Croy
- [Jmap] Message Tracking and JMAP extensibility (was Re: Submission is not hard),
Chris Newman
- Re: [Jmap] Submission,
Ted Lemon
- Re: [Jmap] Submission,
Chris Newman
- Re: [Jmap] Address Validation (was Re: Submission),
Adrien de Croy
- [Jmap] Address Validation (was Re: Submission),
Chris Newman
- Re: [Jmap] Submission,
Ted Lemon
- Re: [Jmap] Submission,
Adrien de Croy
- Re: [Jmap] Submission,
John R Levine
- Apr 21 2017
- Re: [Jmap] Submission,
Adrien de Croy
- Re: [Jmap] Submission,
John Levine
- Re: [Jmap] Submission is not hard,
Adrien de Croy
- Re: [Jmap] Submission,
Adrien de Croy
- Re: [Jmap] Submission is not hard,
John R Levine
- Re: [Jmap] Submission,
John R Levine
- Re: [Jmap] Submission is not hard,
Adrien de Croy
- Re: [Jmap] Submission is not hard,
John R Levine
- Re: [Jmap] Submission is not hard,
Adrien de Croy
- Re: [Jmap] Submission,
Adrien de Croy
- Re: [Jmap] Submission,
John Levine
- Re: [Jmap] Submission,
John Levine
- Re: [Jmap] Submission is not hard,
Ned Freed
- Re: [Jmap] Submission,
Ted Lemon
- Re: [Jmap] Submission,
Ned Freed
- Re: [Jmap] Submission is not hard,
John Levine
- Re: [Jmap] Submission,
Ted Lemon
- Re: [Jmap] Submission,
Arnt Gulbrandsen
- Re: [Jmap] Submission,
Ted Lemon
- Re: [Jmap] Is the group address syntax from RFC5322 really not supported in JMAP?,
Alexey Melnikov
- [Jmap] Is the group address syntax from RFC5322 really not supported in JMAP?,
Mads Hjorth
- Re: [Jmap] Submission,
Adrien de Croy
- Re: [Jmap] Submission,
Adrien de Croy
- Re: [Jmap] Submission,
Ned Freed
- Re: [Jmap] Submission,
John Levine
- Re: [Jmap] Submission,
John Levine
- Apr 20 2017
- Re: [Jmap] Submission,
Adrien de Croy
- Re: [Jmap] Submission,
Chris Newman
- Re: [Jmap] Submission,
Ted Lemon
- Re: [Jmap] Submission,
Adrien de Croy
- Re: [Jmap] Submission,
Brandon Long
- Re: [Jmap] Submission,
Brandon Long
- Re: [Jmap] Submission,
John Levine
- Re: [Jmap] Submission,
Ted Lemon
- Re: [Jmap] Submission,
Chris Newman
- Re: [Jmap] Submission,
Chris Newman
- Re: [Jmap] Submission,
Ted Lemon
- Re: [Jmap] Submission,
Chris Newman
- Apr 19 2017
- Re: [Jmap] Submission,
Ted Lemon
- Re: [Jmap] Submission,
Alexey Melnikov
- Re: [Jmap] Submission,
Ted Lemon
- Re: [Jmap] Submission,
Chris Newman
- Re: [Jmap] Submission,
John R Levine
- Re: [Jmap] Submission,
John R Levine
- Re: [Jmap] Submission,
Daniel Kahn Gillmor
- Re: [Jmap] Submission,
Ted Lemon
- Re: [Jmap] Submission,
John Levine
- Re: [Jmap] Submission,
Alexey Melnikov
- Re: [Jmap] Submission,
Daniel Kahn Gillmor
- [Jmap] Meeting minutes uploaded,
Bron Gondwana
- Re: [Jmap] Submission,
Ricardo Signes
- Re: [Jmap] Submission,
Arnt Gulbrandsen
- Re: [Jmap] Submission,
Arnt Gulbrandsen
- Re: [Jmap] Submission,
Arnt Gulbrandsen
- Re: [Jmap] Submission,
Alexey Melnikov
- Re: [Jmap] Submission,
Adrien de Croy
- Re: [Jmap] Adding the Message::isForwarded property,
Alexey Melnikov
- Re: [Jmap] Submission,
Neil Jenkins
- Re: [Jmap] Adding the Message::isForwarded property,
Neil Jenkins
- [Jmap] Submission,
Adrien de Croy
- Re: [Jmap] Adding the Message::isForwarded property,
Adrien de Croy
- Re: [Jmap] Adding the Message::isForwarded property,
Neil Jenkins
- Re: [Jmap] Push mechanism,
Aki Tuomi
- Re: [Jmap] Push mechanism,
Neil Jenkins
- Re: [Jmap] Prerequisites for implementing JMAP,
Neil Jenkins
Mail converted by MHonArc