IETF Logo Mail Archive

[MMUSIC] BUNDLE goes UP: Do we need port zero for bundle-only m- lines?

Christer Holmberg <christer.holmberg@ericsson.com> Thu, 08 August 2013 06:18 UTC

Return-Path: <christer.holmberg@ericsson.com>
X-Original-To: mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F2F721F9D56 for <mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 7 Aug 2013 23:18:54 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -5.897
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.897 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.351, BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_SE=0.35, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id YPxHkglQhLLu for <mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 7 Aug 2013 23:18:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mailgw2.ericsson.se (mailgw2.ericsson.se [193.180.251.37]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0DAAD11E80D9 for <mmusic@ietf.org>; Wed, 7 Aug 2013 23:18:48 -0700 (PDT)
X-AuditID: c1b4fb25-b7f826d000001766-e1-5203384739c1
Received: from ESESSHC012.ericsson.se (Unknown_Domain [153.88.253.125]) by mailgw2.ericsson.se (Symantec Mail Security) with SMTP id 35.FC.05990.74833025; Thu, 8 Aug 2013 08:18:47 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from ESESSMB209.ericsson.se ([169.254.9.135]) by ESESSHC012.ericsson.se ([153.88.183.54]) with mapi id 14.02.0328.009; Thu, 8 Aug 2013 08:18:47 +0200
From: Christer Holmberg <christer.holmberg@ericsson.com>
To: mmusic <mmusic@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: BUNDLE goes UP: Do we need port zero for bundle-only m- lines?
Thread-Index: Ac6T/yOjlGF0THkKQYuF8hS65+1TmA==
Date: Thu, 08 Aug 2013 06:18:46 +0000
Message-ID: <7594FB04B1934943A5C02806D1A2204B1C421C80@ESESSMB209.ericsson.se>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_7594FB04B1934943A5C02806D1A2204B1C421C80ESESSMB209erics_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFlrBLMWRmVeSWpSXmKPExsUyM+Jvra67BXOQQXubhsXU5Y9ZHBg9liz5 yRTAGMVlk5Kak1mWWqRvl8CVcWHldsaC80IVB76eZmtg/M/fxcjJISFgIvHszhJmCFtM4sK9 9WxdjFwcQgKHGSWmrZjJCOEsZpR49/w1kMPBwSZgIdH9TxukQURARmLvps1gzcIC7hLdL9ax QMR9JL4smsUKYetJfH67gBWklUVARaKn2RDE5BXwlXh1TwakghFo7fdTa5hAbGYBcYlbT+Yz QZwjILFkz3mo00QlXj7+xwpRky9x4vxeRhCbV0BQ4uTMJywTGAVnIWmfhaRsFpIyiLiexI2p U9ggbG2JZQtfM0PYuhIz/h1iQRZfwMi+ipE9NzEzJ73caBMjMLQPbvmtuoPxzjmRQ4zSHCxK 4ryb9c4ECgmkJ5akZqemFqQWxReV5qQWH2Jk4uCUamC0fVJhajGvu0bmZrhfsZP2ncK/rDZr 9z5989s2wFjTR0X5V/DSi2zPfk5gvn2pa/6NJ3OE5r2Ym3juh3Hl+URVhns7pFcaXl83VU6l xeA+pz1jYLm/0k2hnztiHz5wCdj2YibjlYvN2pk7S7gunzq8c3XevBvut59MuNIUKt7umyf8 z2lWdQSzEktxRqKhFnNRcSIAxV6yWjsCAAA=
Subject: [MMUSIC] BUNDLE goes UP: Do we need port zero for bundle-only m- lines?
X-BeenThere: mmusic@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multiparty Multimedia Session Control Working Group <mmusic.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mmusic>, <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/mmusic>
List-Post: <mailto:mmusic@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mmusic>, <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 08 Aug 2013 06:18:54 -0000

Hi,

As has been indicated, bundle-only can only be used when one knows that the receiver, and possible intermediaries etc, support it.

So, based on that assumption, my question is: why do we need port 0? Why not assign the suggested bundle port to the bundle-only m- lines from the beginning? As the bundle port is anyway going to be used (even if the receiver does not want to use bundle), there is no need to reserve additional ports for bundle-only m- lines.

Regards,

Christer



Sent from Windows using TouchDown (www.nitrodesk.com)

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email