IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Netconf] Netconf Charter update for approval

Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org> Tue, 14 January 2014 15:31 UTC

Return-Path: <barryleiba@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: netconf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netconf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 999451AE0EA for <netconf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 14 Jan 2014 07:31:18 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.278
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.278 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id C5cZ3MOzkM8C for <netconf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 14 Jan 2014 07:31:17 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-qa0-x232.google.com (mail-qa0-x232.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c00::232]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E27991AE0F7 for <netconf@ietf.org>; Tue, 14 Jan 2014 07:31:11 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-qa0-f50.google.com with SMTP id cm18so6524629qab.9 for <netconf@ietf.org>; Tue, 14 Jan 2014 07:31:00 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject :from:to:cc:content-type; bh=ntgprsOUaLJailPdgDr/pQxyYBBxkc0y6QMkAE7YoiM=; b=iqR8qObuJ6BwEx7oMXBf2oBcJ4oTQHSQ9ShF2wxKrH50CqYOdViJkxFmhlmAtsbz5d LT9OnCPMcA2q7pmCq5W5FOUr0XUq2+rZJGNkVdIoE8mMaBO90nCzrae4Y86bnBupHyT1 N32EchuVlfjXCSJBPjtvPvXPZTIWkk9hPEBvBoVMOBnOuCK9RZlaYn/37SRq6M1oI5ZO 66jC1erMjMWUMY13f3HUagi7xFQjaItnkqAUzeZMijVciRJ8vrK8hRsqkTRwPBtqTj87 axN158m7uih2NqBhct+6pa0bn3haX1uKekDMh4YrtSfrTPo6afnF0+GoKuFxI6UK6OWj THnw==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.224.166.70 with SMTP id l6mr3810460qay.25.1389713460367; Tue, 14 Jan 2014 07:31:00 -0800 (PST)
Sender: barryleiba@gmail.com
Received: by 10.224.23.67 with HTTP; Tue, 14 Jan 2014 07:31:00 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <52D3E647.9070000@cisco.com>
References: <E4DE949E6CE3E34993A2FF8AE79131F8248A33@DEMUMBX005.nsn-intra.net> <52D3E647.9070000@cisco.com>
Date: Tue, 14 Jan 2014 10:31:00 -0500
X-Google-Sender-Auth: mG9L7llTKDCYGDuqNExA6DseebM
Message-ID: <CALaySJ+b12_iF+f15SW2EszXJ-mrijCBmt6DjKX1FnuP56G_9g@mail.gmail.com>
From: Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org>
To: Benoit Claise <bclaise@cisco.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Cc: Pete Resnick <presnick@qti.qualcomm.com>, Netconf <netconf@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Netconf] Netconf Charter update for approval
X-BeenThere: netconf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Network Configuration WG mailing list <netconf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netconf>, <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/netconf/>
List-Post: <mailto:netconf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netconf>, <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 Jan 2014 15:31:18 -0000

Hi, all.
Just hitting the one App-related part:

> 2. HTTP2.0 is developed in the HTTPbis WG.
> I see that draft-bierman-netconf-restconf is based on HTTP 1.1. Will it
> still work with HTTP2.0? Or is this completely orthogonal?
> I've not been been following the HTTP2.0 developments, so I don't even know
> if this is a valid question, but I'm wondering if we should say something
> about the HTTP 2.0 compatibility in the charter?

I think there's no issue here.  First, http 2.0 won't be suitable for
all situations, and http 1.1 will be around and considered current for
a very long time yet.  Second, http 2.0 is being designed to be
protocol compatible with http 1.1.  Implementations will have to
change to use http 2.0, but those changes should involve code around
the edges, not at the core.  At the core, other protocols should not
have to change to become http-2.0-aware.

> hope you had restful holidays.

RESTful?  Hahahahaha......

Barry, Applications AD

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email