[Netconf] IESG telechat Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-netconf-restconf-17

worley@ariadne.com (Dale R. Worley) Fri, 07 October 2016 20:42 UTC

Return-Path: <worley@alum.mit.edu>
X-Original-To: netconf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netconf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 99B181295CE for <netconf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 7 Oct 2016 13:42:31 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.934
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.934 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_SOFTFAIL=0.665] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id SSaQK23gnmPU for <netconf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 7 Oct 2016 13:42:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from resqmta-ch2-09v.sys.comcast.net (resqmta-ch2-09v.sys.comcast.net [IPv6:2001:558:fe21:29:69:252:207:41]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C7D48129720 for <netconf@ietf.org>; Fri, 7 Oct 2016 13:42:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from resomta-ch2-18v.sys.comcast.net ([69.252.207.114]) by resqmta-ch2-09v.sys.comcast.net with SMTP id sbxobKeC81XXBsbyEbNQX0; Fri, 07 Oct 2016 20:42:18 +0000
Received: from hobgoblin.ariadne.com ([73.16.37.18]) by resomta-ch2-18v.sys.comcast.net with SMTP id sbyDbGOKQZx9SsbyDbbr9e; Fri, 07 Oct 2016 20:42:18 +0000
Received: from hobgoblin.ariadne.com (hobgoblin.ariadne.com [127.0.0.1]) by hobgoblin.ariadne.com (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id u97KgGTb030828 for <netconf@ietf.org>; Fri, 7 Oct 2016 16:42:16 -0400
Received: (from worley@localhost) by hobgoblin.ariadne.com (8.14.7/8.14.7/Submit) id u97KgGie030825; Fri, 7 Oct 2016 16:42:16 -0400
X-Authentication-Warning: hobgoblin.ariadne.com: worley set sender to worley@alum.mit.edu using -f
From: worley@ariadne.com
To: netconf@ietf.org
Sender: worley@ariadne.com
Date: Fri, 07 Oct 2016 16:42:16 -0400
Message-ID: <87vax351sn.fsf@hobgoblin.ariadne.com>
X-CMAE-Envelope: MS4wfK3K1LbLe1YUhlTxX9S040ovW5IN8ayx5ZlH6nlZPPs/wCUyRJthZIqQJz+dhKxtlAdvjYW4A9KNei6EBfG3+6sotZoTZkIqyY+4gWlA9xR+xJstkUfE k1F97+ubZ9FsQ6iJDQHzB8NEXTUV0wTG3v6CdJ3V9AkdxkMCUnv1DXqX
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netconf/6i71IGOTs4hTmilnZgE06cQ0GfE>
Subject: [Netconf] IESG telechat Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-netconf-restconf-17
X-BeenThere: netconf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Network Configuration WG mailing list <netconf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netconf>, <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/netconf/>
List-Post: <mailto:netconf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netconf>, <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 07 Oct 2016 20:42:31 -0000

I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed by
the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please wait for direction from your
document shepherd or AD before posting a new version of the draft.

For more information, please see the FAQ at
<http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>.

Document: draft-ietf-netconf-restconf-17
Reviewer: Dale R. Worley
Review Date: 2016-10-07
IETF LC End Date: 2016-08-03
IESG Telechat date: 2016-10-13

Summary:

This draft is ready for publication as a Standards Track RFC.

This is a comparison of draft-ietf-netconf-restconf-17 against my review
for draft-ietf-netconf-restconf-16.  In my opinion, all review items
have been resolved.  I am repeating the following item because its
resolution is by recognizing an error in the referenced RFC 6415, which
perhaps ought to be considered by the IESG:

    The draft makes use of reltive URLs as values of the href
    attribute of the Link element in XRD documents (RFC 6415).
    Relative links are not usually considered to be "URIs", but rather
    "URI-references" (RFC 3986 section 4.1), and RFC 6415 uses "URI"
    consistently, not "URI-reference".  Also, all examples in RFC 6415
    show complete URIs.

Note that the above issue has been resolved with the understanding
that RFC 6415 is incorrectly stated, and it seems to have always been
intended to allow relative URLs in XRD:  Compare with its source,
Extensible Resource Descriptor (XRD) Version 1.0
(http://docs.oasis-open.org/xri/xrd/v1.0/xrd-1.0.html) sections 2.6
and 1.5.2.  This issue has been filed as erratum 4811 to RFC 6415
(https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?eid=4811).

Dale