Re: [netmod] Regarding IPR on draft-ietf-netmod-yang-model-classification

"Carl Moberg (camoberg)" <camoberg@cisco.com> Tue, 29 November 2016 05:45 UTC

From: "Carl Moberg (camoberg)" <camoberg@cisco.com>
To: "Benoit Claise (bclaise)" <bclaise@cisco.com>
Thread-Topic: Regarding IPR on draft-ietf-netmod-yang-model-classification
Thread-Index: AQHSScmGg7CZhXckMUWbmOsHIfyrt6DvZGaAgAAB74CAAA23Jg==
Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2016 05:45:38 +0000
Message-ID: <B122B398-CDCA-49E2-A93F-003C8AF9DFF2@cisco.com>
References: <fcc7ca09-dfe2-61ae-43bd-5e18354f9f98@labn.net> <5CDA80CF-E5DF-4151-99BC-ABF6687D22F5@voltanet.io>, <ce72798b-9f79-82be-eca8-2177dad4ff90@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <ce72798b-9f79-82be-eca8-2177dad4ff90@cisco.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_B122B398CDCA49E2A93F003C8AF9DFF2ciscocom_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netmod/uy25PKZuZPME071Di75u3TZywhI>
Cc: NetMod WG Chairs <netmod-chairs@ietf.org>, NetMod WG <netmod@ietf.org>, Dean Bogdanovic <dean@voltanet.io>
Subject: Re: [netmod] Regarding IPR on draft-ietf-netmod-yang-model-classification
Precedence: list

No, I'm not aware of any IPR that applies to this draft

On Nov 28, 2016, at 23:56, Benoit Claise (bclaise) <bclaise@cisco.com<mailto:bclaise@cisco.com>> wrote:

On 11/28/2016 11:49 PM, Dean Bogdanovic wrote:
Chairs,

No, I'm not aware of any IPR that applies to this draft
Same answer on my side.

Regards, B.

Dean

On Nov 28, 2016, at 11:48 PM, Lou Berger <lberger@labn.net<mailto:lberger@labn.net>> wrote:


Authors, Contributors, WG,

As part of the preparation for WG Last Call

Are you aware of any IPR that applies to drafts identified above?

[NOTE: Adoption poll will be on the first draft, but authors have agreed
that -01 WG revision will be based on both.]

Please state either:

"No, I'm not aware of any IPR that applies to this draft"
or
"Yes, I'm aware of IPR that applies to this draft"

If so, has this IPR been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules
(see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for more details)?

If yes to the above, please state either:

"Yes, the IPR has been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules"
or
"No, the IPR has not been disclosed"

If you answer no, please provide any additional details you think
appropriate.

If you are listed as a document author or contributor please answer the
above by responding to this email regardless of whether or not you are
aware of any relevant IPR. This document will not advance to the next
stage until a response has been received from each author and listed
contributor. NOTE: THIS APPLIES TO ALL OF YOU LISTED IN THIS MESSAGE'S
TO LINES.

If you are on the WG email list or attend WG meetings but are not listed
as an author or contributor, we remind you of your obligations under
the IETF IPR rules which encourages you to notify the IETF if you are
aware of IPR of others on an IETF contribution, or to refrain from
participating in any contribution or discussion related to your
undisclosed IPR. For more information, please see the RFCs listed above
and
http://trac.tools.ietf.org/group/iesg/trac/wiki/IntellectualProperty.

Thank you,
NETMOD WG Chairs

PS Please include all listed in the headers of this message in your
response.


.

[netmod] Regarding IPR on draft-ietf-netmod-yang-… Lou Berger
Re: [netmod] Regarding IPR on draft-ietf-netmod-y… Dean Bogdanovic
Re: [netmod] Regarding IPR on draft-ietf-netmod-y… Benoit Claise
Re: [netmod] Regarding IPR on draft-ietf-netmod-y… Carl Moberg (camoberg)