Re: [netmod] Regarding IPR on draft-wilton-netmod-intf-vlan-yang

"Tapraj Singh (tapsingh)" <tapsingh@cisco.com> Thu, 08 December 2016 22:21 UTC

Return-Path: <tapsingh@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C41B1299FA; Thu, 8 Dec 2016 14:21:12 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -17.418
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-17.418 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-2.896, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id QTpIXLECTOMN; Thu, 8 Dec 2016 14:21:10 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rcdn-iport-9.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-9.cisco.com [173.37.86.80]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BD525129B9E; Thu, 8 Dec 2016 14:17:39 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=2492; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1481235459; x=1482445059; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:content-id:content-transfer-encoding: mime-version; bh=YG6TVmaRS/0ry99ZA6WKPh6H1rKExtZyUwcKaz8X3c8=; b=NsVOuzt5whkIlqtVG/l6h1bAusbH45raTlu+v3ogMicnszS/1378h0l5 wUZp1ZvpGz/C2EdN8XZLxytXtV1pqa9rlDt0FcuinZ7PjJ0BObXn5OGnK UBSXQTlGsDzj1qOg3UjoLZQ6MHTE4lA7uQlx1iADF90s17ffVWvUfZ4+v E=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0BxAQCw20lY/51dJa1eGgEBAQECAQEBAQgBAQEBgzcBAQEBAR9agQYHAY1DrBSCCCmFeAIagWA/FAECAQEBAQEBAWIohGkGIxFABRACAQgODAImAgICMBUQAgQBDQWIaw6nSIIpiywBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEdgQuFM4F9gl6EGhEBHBeCbS2CMAWaagGGTopQgXNQhC2JUZIVAR83YTgjDgEBhSNyAYZqgSEBgQwBAQE
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.33,321,1477958400"; d="scan'208";a="179017880"
Received: from rcdn-core-6.cisco.com ([173.37.93.157]) by rcdn-iport-9.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 08 Dec 2016 22:17:38 +0000
Received: from XCH-RCD-009.cisco.com (xch-rcd-009.cisco.com [173.37.102.19]) by rcdn-core-6.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id uB8MHcZf005482 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Thu, 8 Dec 2016 22:17:38 GMT
Received: from xch-rcd-009.cisco.com (173.37.102.19) by XCH-RCD-009.cisco.com (173.37.102.19) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1210.3; Thu, 8 Dec 2016 16:17:38 -0600
Received: from xch-rcd-009.cisco.com ([173.37.102.19]) by XCH-RCD-009.cisco.com ([173.37.102.19]) with mapi id 15.00.1210.000; Thu, 8 Dec 2016 16:17:38 -0600
From: "Tapraj Singh (tapsingh)" <tapsingh@cisco.com>
To: Lou Berger <lberger@labn.net>, "Robert Wilton -X (rwilton - ENSOFT LIMITED at Cisco)" <rwilton@cisco.com>, "David Ball -X (daviball - ENSOFT LIMITED at Cisco)" <daviball@cisco.com>, "ssivaraj@juniper.net" <ssivaraj@juniper.net>
Thread-Topic: Regarding IPR on draft-wilton-netmod-intf-vlan-yang
Thread-Index: AQHSUZzLxyFPIgQPIkC6GxCuNQZwcqD+fQKA
Date: Thu, 08 Dec 2016 22:17:38 +0000
Message-ID: <DD854E60-008F-45CD-A058-78A5E4FF8B50@cisco.com>
References: <61336d77-830e-7e33-3cd3-202e31124d8e@labn.net>
In-Reply-To: <61336d77-830e-7e33-3cd3-202e31124d8e@labn.net>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [128.107.150.67]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-ID: <778DA533435464448C7B92F079A8134C@emea.cisco.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netmod/2QwDklSxhvbhp99upQ2mxtlhx3c>
Cc: NetMod Chairs <netmod-chairs@ietf.org>, NetMod WG <netmod@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [netmod] Regarding IPR on draft-wilton-netmod-intf-vlan-yang
X-BeenThere: netmod@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: NETMOD WG list <netmod.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/netmod/>
List-Post: <mailto:netmod@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 08 Dec 2016 22:21:12 -0000

As a co-auther  I am not aware of any IPR.

Thanks
Tapraj




On 12/8/16, 1:47 PM, "Lou Berger" <lberger@labn.net> wrote:

>
>Authors, Contributors, WG,
>
>As part of preparation for WG Adoption
>
>Are you aware of any IPR that applies to drafts identified above?
>
>Please state either:
>
>"No, I'm not aware of any IPR that applies to this draft"
>or
>"Yes, I'm aware of IPR that applies to this draft"
>
>If so, has this IPR been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules
>(see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for more details)?
>
>If yes to the above, please state either:
>
>"Yes, the IPR has been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules"
>or
>"No, the IPR has not been disclosed"
>
>If you answer no, please provide any additional details you think
>appropriate.
>
>If you are listed as a document author or contributor please answer the
>above by responding to this email regardless of whether or not you are
>aware of any relevant IPR. This document will not advance to the next
>stage until a response has been received from each author and listed
>contributor. NOTE: THIS APPLIES TO ALL OF YOU LISTED IN THIS MESSAGE'S
>TO LINES.
>
>If you are on the WG email list or attend WG meetings but are not listed
>as an author or contributor, we remind you of your obligations under
>the IETF IPR rules which encourages you to notify the IETF if you are
>aware of IPR of others on an IETF contribution, or to refrain from
>participating in any contribution or discussion related to your
>undisclosed IPR. For more information, please see the RFCs listed above
>and
>http://trac.tools.ietf.org/group/iesg/trac/wiki/IntellectualProperty.
>
>Thank you,
>NETMOD WG Chairs
>
>PS Please include all listed in the headers of this message in your
>response.
>
>