IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [netmod] Regarding IPR on draft-ietf-netmod-revised-datastores-04

Robert Wilton <rwilton@cisco.com> Tue, 29 August 2017 08:05 UTC

Return-Path: <rwilton@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0EFFE132620 for <netmod@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 29 Aug 2017 01:05:02 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.5
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.5 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id GoEwJwIp-Rnd for <netmod@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 29 Aug 2017 01:04:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from aer-iport-2.cisco.com (aer-iport-2.cisco.com [173.38.203.52]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 47F44132197 for <netmod@ietf.org>; Tue, 29 Aug 2017 01:04:59 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=1834; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1503993899; x=1505203499; h=subject:to:references:from:message-id:date:mime-version: in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=lojjd8hH5eN/g2dIyjSwIr8nNVQwLkchwz+Sfl9XTvg=; b=FtOwh0VNuIdXsGXGK2s4Rj42J0NnLPxYDE0jAnXRm6zBdEtjmLWficgs W+6ug1IHwErx6YPDNIv6PVlGFS0ZReIx0rt6oPDUhhv+v9K/2ti0i0jz8 LgLyFReAraQ9G/H/79U6DnQctIYT1Pc65dbOX2YBcQNZ/HK+ZzPHJBWwn s=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0CmAgCHH6VZ/xbLJq1eGgEBAQECAQEBAQgBAQEBhD6BFQGDdosRkHUiljWCBCyFGwKERxQBAgEBAQEBAQFrKIUZAQUjFTwVCw4KAgImAgJXBgEMCAEBii0QsTyCJ4tlAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBIIENgh2DUIFjKwuCcoRCARIBgzKCYQEEoGeHWYxyghJahQyDWYcZjU2IcjYhgQILMiEIHBVJhxw/N4hogjIBAQE
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.41,444,1498521600"; d="scan'208";a="654250211"
Received: from aer-iport-nat.cisco.com (HELO aer-core-2.cisco.com) ([173.38.203.22]) by aer-iport-2.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 29 Aug 2017 08:04:57 +0000
Received: from [10.63.23.66] (dhcp-ensft1-uk-vla370-10-63-23-66.cisco.com [10.63.23.66]) by aer-core-2.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id v7T84uY3028795; Tue, 29 Aug 2017 08:04:57 GMT
To: Lou Berger <lberger@labn.net>, NetMod WG <netmod@ietf.org>
References: <904712c6-038f-ea33-5a1a-62dd493a9481@labn.net>
From: Robert Wilton <rwilton@cisco.com>
Message-ID: <981f9d4b-b39a-2918-cf55-f4a982edfd5b@cisco.com>
Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2017 09:04:55 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.2.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <904712c6-038f-ea33-5a1a-62dd493a9481@labn.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Language: en-US
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netmod/k6Hftc9F4qOjdi25Dr1joMxad04>
Subject: Re: [netmod] Regarding IPR on draft-ietf-netmod-revised-datastores-04
X-BeenThere: netmod@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: NETMOD WG list <netmod.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/netmod/>
List-Post: <mailto:netmod@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2017 08:05:02 -0000

No, I'm not aware of any IPR that applies to this draft.

Rob


On 25/08/2017 21:20, Lou Berger wrote:
> Authors, Contributors, WG,
>
> As part of the preparation for WG Last Call:
>
> Are you aware of any IPR that applies to drafts identified above?
>
> Please state either:
>
> "No, I'm not aware of any IPR that applies to this draft"
> or
> "Yes, I'm aware of IPR that applies to this draft"
>
> If so, has this IPR been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules
> (see RFCs 3669, 5378 and 8179 for more details)?
>
> If yes to the above, please state either:
>
> "Yes, the IPR has been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules"
> or
> "No, the IPR has not been disclosed"
>
> If you answer no, please provide any additional details you think
> appropriate.
>
> If you are listed as a document author or contributor please answer the
> above by responding to this email regardless of whether or not you are
> aware of any relevant IPR. This document will not advance to the next
> stage until a response has been received from each author and listed
> contributor. NOTE: THIS APPLIES TO ALL OF YOU LISTED IN THIS MESSAGE'S
> TO LINES.
>
> If you are on the WG email list or attend WG meetings but are not listed
> as an author or contributor, we remind you of your obligations under
> the IETF IPR rules which encourages you to notify the IETF if you are
> aware of IPR of others on an IETF contribution, or to refrain from
> participating in any contribution or discussion related to your
> undisclosed IPR. For more information, please see the RFCs listed above
> and
> http://trac.tools.ietf.org/group/iesg/trac/wiki/IntellectualProperty.
>
> Thank you,
> NetMod WG Chairs
>
> PS Please include all listed in the headers of this message in your
> response.
>
>
> .
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email