[OAUTH-WG] Shepherd Writeup for OAuth 2.0 for Native Apps
Hannes Tschofenig <hannes.tschofenig@gmx.net> Mon, 10 October 2016 10:30 UTC
Return-Path: <hannes.tschofenig@gmx.net>
X-Original-To: oauth@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: oauth@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9EDA5129447 for <oauth@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 10 Oct 2016 03:30:24 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -5.597
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.597 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-2.996, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ViYjEBzrRKD8 for <oauth@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 10 Oct 2016 03:30:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mout.gmx.net (mout.gmx.net [212.227.17.20]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 654BB1200DF for <oauth@ietf.org>; Mon, 10 Oct 2016 03:30:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.91.134] ([80.92.121.244]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx103) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0MU0U9-1bSleU19cH-00QinJ for <oauth@ietf.org>; Mon, 10 Oct 2016 12:30:19 +0200
From: Hannes Tschofenig <hannes.tschofenig@gmx.net>
Openpgp: id=071A97A9ECBADCA8E31E678554D9CEEF4D776BC9
To: "oauth@ietf.org" <oauth@ietf.org>
Message-ID: <f42f0eef-925e-a6db-deb5-bc573c3023f2@gmx.net>
Date: Mon, 10 Oct 2016 12:30:16 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.3.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha512"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="asbhD2XjIt8VX5MQpxIOCcWWIuDfShc2j"
X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:RiDVnzhkpGAL3tP8LmDS/OCBnPS5gYPWcSlqBiqaXKCMkW4+HFy W4k4Arg2+6ZRzcN1VnDNSOkGWPCERpADFzUSRNQU8QySpfGtb83xC4sW5vew12g906+Eh56 8/icoBmHdrx1IPP+e3ljXEbMs4DBP7S5qzKvNMs2XL16X9M9oRbRnh0C5oUEurK+KEur+en LvtVah58kaF4yp8N0v0sw==
X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V01:K0:OUDvszFRxa4=:PDrEz6sZUX6EzKTo92xVLS yKxzNq5XEdE61Z6eGXVzDXzqCZPU+MgAU77Cs3viXdmyZlBYVum3ikHAvNNqE7+tbKfiB2fSG evOvtcFAGMsTt8+Qq851lFrEE+LRpn9dfCFqsX7KfwUQm9jKyL07MsqvU53VWyPzNmPOpL1Gb JpYnnN9orsILEBfHjASQk6ESWqxi9WrTiDkBtJEXRxcrDmyvd6iYHnBqhnO5rt3hMkgEVkBmL uFv1n1VHFQUQN7oqGTZzq7CX1EBovgtqtR8xX/RmoyXpltHNzcGslSOoakVjfm6B60sTyDEIn kvGZheOxTfQthz939G7Jnq6m+3pVdiv7aD+wq5l9M9ueOfGNW2bY/G2frBoznIMOkleO41cxX wZYBkQhrqWeUsnD09dg08Ydr175qgQBLTbBtaDbfn0vb8ucEPj+j5XayEUG0EWFAflYGjUM1f 0O9NAP7/WNUMQEcHZhXIT2jYuABC3GJ0GlYBjxgAqKvlIarUMctXzlhyH44LaQVWGhPMKihOW rY94XsaXP4/Lr/23mFOrc+IhEXeutFYHZb4iQfKDtWZarB/ZX0rIxxmR0kOYBaTCJw93fU/YP CRdUbt0QORlXzjH1FNiq0Rtcc6MdLGdwiGOpmlszeJD9e/CUtU7coBz8c2/LFLQruvec7opwp 4iLrc6B6XTtCNzVVmZJLTdH4613SdGwhKqFbvjdwraqLAjFuTBzIV7U2e3aAt5PHFla/s/mVS WsywPCTcwdqM3GBwQ//o3Q7ixDVUVxwXV0ryJXgCAXDtkIK0UnOGfRy+1hU=
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/oauth/xTAP-6r2ibvH86Sh9dypeji68sA>
Subject: [OAUTH-WG] Shepherd Writeup for OAuth 2.0 for Native Apps
X-BeenThere: oauth@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: OAUTH WG <oauth.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/oauth>, <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/oauth/>
List-Post: <mailto:oauth@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth>, <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 10 Oct 2016 10:30:24 -0000
Hi all, Here is the shepherd writeup for the native apps document: https://github.com/hannestschofenig/tschofenig-ids/blob/master/shepherd-writeups/Writeup_OAuth_NativeApps.txt There are only a few minor things missing: 1) I haven't received a response from William on my IPR confirmation question (as far as I can tell): https://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/oauth/current/msg16672.html 2) The document lacks an IANA Considerations section. Please add one and indicate that there are no actions for IANA. 3) There is an unused reference in the document, namely RFC 6819 Ciao Hannes
- [OAUTH-WG] Shepherd Writeup for OAuth 2.0 for Nat… Hannes Tschofenig
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] Shepherd Writeup for OAuth 2.0 for… Brian Campbell
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] Shepherd Writeup for OAuth 2.0 for… John Bradley
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] Shepherd Writeup for OAuth 2.0 for… William Denniss