[Pce] Survey on IRO
Julien Meuric <julien.meuric@orange.com> Fri, 04 July 2014 15:57 UTC
Return-Path: <julien.meuric@orange.com>
X-Original-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AA2781B2A7F for <pce@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 4 Jul 2014 08:57:29 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.535
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.535 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HELO_EQ_FR=0.35, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.651, SPF_SOFTFAIL=0.665] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id CWBunyifMrmR for <pce@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 4 Jul 2014 08:57:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from p-mail1.rd.orange.com (p-mail1.rd.orange.com [195.101.245.15]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5E2511A0353 for <pce@ietf.org>; Fri, 4 Jul 2014 08:57:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from p-mail1.rd.orange.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by localhost (Postfix) with SMTP id 838AA7D4002 for <pce@ietf.org>; Fri, 4 Jul 2014 17:57:27 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from ftrdsmtp1.rd.francetelecom.fr (unknown [10.192.128.46]) by p-mail1.rd.orange.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7BB1241021F for <pce@ietf.org>; Fri, 4 Jul 2014 17:57:27 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from ftrdmel10.rd.francetelecom.fr ([10.192.128.44]) by ftrdsmtp1.rd.francetelecom.fr with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Fri, 4 Jul 2014 17:57:27 +0200
Received: from [10.193.71.122] ([10.193.71.122]) by ftrdmel10.rd.francetelecom.fr with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Fri, 4 Jul 2014 17:57:27 +0200
Message-ID: <53B6CEE6.1080109@orange.com>
Date: Fri, 04 Jul 2014 17:57:26 +0200
From: Julien Meuric <julien.meuric@orange.com>
Organization: Orange
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.6.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "pce@ietf.org" <pce@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="------------020902090300020509040109"
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 04 Jul 2014 15:57:27.0068 (UTC) FILETIME=[A713ADC0:01CF97A0]
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/pce/GNqr3Y_vCuQjTmSp0_YCP___iPU
Subject: [Pce] Survey on IRO
X-BeenThere: pce@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Dhruv Dhody <dhruv.dhody@huawei.com>, 'JP Vasseur' <jpv@cisco.com>, Julien Meuric <julien.meuric@orange.com>
List-Id: Path Computation Element <pce.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/pce>, <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/pce/>
List-Post: <mailto:pce@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce>, <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 04 Jul 2014 15:57:29 -0000
Hi PCE WG. To address the issues associated with draft-ietf-pce-pcep-domain-sequence and "Include Route Object" in PCEP, Dhruv has proposed to start a small survey. If implementers agree that we need to clarify this, they would be much welcome to answer the attached questions. Dhruv will process the results, but to improve confidentiality, answers may be sent privately to the chairs. Thanks, JP & Julien, on behalf of Dhruv
- [Pce] Survey on IRO Julien Meuric
- [Pce] FW: Survey on IRO Dhruv Dhody