IETF Logo Mail Archive

[PCN] WGLC concluded (publishing PSDM and 3-state encoding drafts)

Steven Blake <slblake@petri-meat.com> Mon, 19 March 2012 03:11 UTC

Return-Path: <slblake@petri-meat.com>
X-Original-To: pcn@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: pcn@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1CC7C21F858E for <pcn@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 18 Mar 2012 20:11:13 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -100.983
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-100.983 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.984, BAYES_50=0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id K7KIZzl4H8R1 for <pcn@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 18 Mar 2012 20:11:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from elom.tchmachines.com (elom.tchmachines.com [208.76.80.198]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46AC621F858A for <pcn@ietf.org>; Sun, 18 Mar 2012 20:11:12 -0700 (PDT)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=default; d=petri-meat.com; h=Received:Subject:From:To:Cc:Date:In-Reply-To:References:Content-Type:X-Mailer:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Message-ID:Mime-Version; b=IuoOftqmnPxAo/th3hIQP5DUWx4cFe2nktyWpXi+q9THjTKEgX+2uxXDga9NGjJqMpvSGXxByDrSEdUNFf3Kqv4aMBew7krdXaz3csnGciWwpwveDMEpdxasuJCBnTZ1;
Received: from cpe-071-065-228-004.nc.res.rr.com ([71.65.228.4]) by elom.tchmachines.com with esmtpa (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from <slblake@petri-meat.com>) id 1S9T03-0005wi-1R; Sun, 18 Mar 2012 23:11:11 -0400
From: Steven Blake <slblake@petri-meat.com>
To: David Harrington <ietfdbh@comcast.net>
Date: Sun, 18 Mar 2012 23:11:09 -0400
In-Reply-To: <1331613507.23822.6.camel@tachyon>
References: <CB840802.1F0F8%ietfdbh@comcast.net> <1331613507.23822.6.camel@tachyon>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
X-Mailer: Evolution 3.0.3 (3.0.3-1.fc15)
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-ID: <1332126671.19389.13.camel@tachyon>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report
X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - elom.tchmachines.com
X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - ietf.org
X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12]
X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - petri-meat.com
Cc: "<pcn@ietf.org>" <pcn@ietf.org>
Subject: [PCN] WGLC concluded (publishing PSDM and 3-state encoding drafts)
X-BeenThere: pcn@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: PCN WG list <pcn.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/pcn>, <mailto:pcn-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/pcn>
List-Post: <mailto:pcn@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pcn-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pcn>, <mailto:pcn-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2012 03:11:13 -0000

Greetings,

I've tallyed up the comments on the WGLC to publish

draft-ietf-pcn-psdm-encoding-02.txt and
draft-ietf-pcn-3-state-encoding-02.txt

as Historical RFCs.  By my count (excluding the chairs):

- one comment for publishing
- one comment against publishing
- three comments that are essentially "no objection".

That is not enough input to determine WG consensus either way.  Given
the non-zero effort required of the IESG and RFC Editor to get these
published, and the lack of consensus to publish, my determination is
that pcn *will not* request that these drafts be published.


Regards,

// Steve

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email