Re: [PWE3] Should draft-martini-pwe3-iccp-01 be a WG doc?
"Thomas D. Nadeau" <tom.nadeau@bt.com> Thu, 02 April 2009 17:21 UTC
Return-Path: <tom.nadeau@bt.com>
X-Original-To: pwe3@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: pwe3@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6A4973A6D30 for <pwe3@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 2 Apr 2009 10:21:59 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.183
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.183 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.349, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1, RCVD_NUMERIC_HELO=2.067]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id j49VnfgG+suQ for <pwe3@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 2 Apr 2009 10:21:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp1.smtp.bt.com (smtp1.smtp.bt.com [217.32.164.137]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 72F9B3A6CE0 for <pwe3@ietf.org>; Thu, 2 Apr 2009 10:21:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from E03MVA4-UKBR.domain1.systemhost.net ([193.113.197.103]) by smtp1.smtp.bt.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Thu, 2 Apr 2009 18:22:58 +0100
Received: from 217.32.164.184 ([217.32.164.184]) by E03MVA4-UKBR.domain1.systemhost.net ([193.113.197.56]) via Exchange Front-End Server mail.bt.com ([193.113.197.28]) with Microsoft Exchange Server HTTP-DAV ; Thu, 2 Apr 2009 17:22:41 +0000
User-Agent: Microsoft-Entourage/12.15.0.081119
Date: Thu, 02 Apr 2009 13:22:40 -0400
From: "Thomas D. Nadeau" <tom.nadeau@bt.com>
To: David Allan <dallan@nortel.com>, Stewart Bryant <stbryant@cisco.com>, pwe3 <pwe3@ietf.org>
Message-ID: <C5FA6CA0.139DA%tom.nadeau@bt.com>
Thread-Topic: [PWE3] Should draft-martini-pwe3-iccp-01 be a WG doc?
Thread-Index: Acmzthrw3LRxxTp2RcW+PAjuVJIAHAAAEP9gAABQPyw=
In-Reply-To: <87AC5F88F03E6249AEA68D40BD3E00BE193A8325@zcarhxm2.corp.nortel.com>
Mime-version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 02 Apr 2009 17:22:58.0996 (UTC) FILETIME=[AB3B7F40:01C9B3B7]
Subject: Re: [PWE3] Should draft-martini-pwe3-iccp-01 be a WG doc?
X-BeenThere: pwe3@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Pseudo Wires Edge to Edge <pwe3.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pwe3>, <mailto:pwe3-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/pwe3>
List-Post: <mailto:pwe3@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pwe3-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pwe3>, <mailto:pwe3-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 02 Apr 2009 17:21:59 -0000
On 4/2/09 1:17 PM, "David Allan" <dallan@nortel.com> wrote: > Hi Stewart > > Comment that most resonated with me in Dublin was "how frequently would > mirrored nodes be multi-vendor", implying minimal interest from anyone > in standardizing this... Speaking as a service provider interested in providing multi-vendor interoperability on this function, I'd disagree that there is minimal interest in standardizing this. I build and deploy multi-vendor networks and need this feature to work on different platforms. There might not be interest from vendors like youself (although the three I use are), having spoken to other colleagues on the SP side, they are interested. I hope they chime in on this thread to this effect. --Tom > That seemed to be group consensus at the time, what has changed? > > Cheers > Dave > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: pwe3-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:pwe3-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of > Stewart Bryant > Sent: Thursday, April 02, 2009 1:09 PM > To: pwe3 > Subject: [PWE3] Should draft-martini-pwe3-iccp-01 be a WG doc? > > The authors of draft-martini-pwe3-iccp-01.txt > > http://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-martini-pwe3-iccp-01.txt > > have requested that this become a PWE3 WG document. > > Please can you send comments to the list by 20th April so that the > chairs can judge consensus. > > Thanks > > Stewart > _______________________________________________ > pwe3 mailing list > pwe3@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pwe3 > _______________________________________________ > pwe3 mailing list > pwe3@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pwe3 -- Principal Architect - 21CN Networks
- [PWE3] Should draft-martini-pwe3-iccp-01 be a WG … Stewart Bryant
- Re: [PWE3] Should draft-martini-pwe3-iccp-01 be a… David Allan
- Re: [PWE3] Should draft-martini-pwe3-iccp-01 be a… Thomas D. Nadeau
- Re: [PWE3] Should draft-martini-pwe3-iccp-01 be a… Sami Boutros
- Re: [PWE3] Should draft-martini-pwe3-iccp-01 be a… Siva Sivabalan (msiva)
- Re: [PWE3] Should draft-martini-pwe3-iccp-01 be a… Stewart Bryant
- Re: [PWE3] Should draft-martini-pwe3-iccp-01 be a… Thomas D. Nadeau
- Re: [PWE3] Should draft-martini-pwe3-iccp-01 be a… Reshad Rahman (rrahman)
- Re: [PWE3] Should draft-martini-pwe3-iccp-01 be a… Luca Martini
- Re: [PWE3] Should draft-martini-pwe3-iccp-01 be a… Danny McPherson
- Re: [PWE3] Should draft-martini-pwe3-iccp-01 be a… David Allan
- Re: [PWE3] Should draft-martini-pwe3-iccp-01 be a… Thomas D. Nadeau
- Re: [PWE3] Should draft-martini-pwe3-iccp-01 be a… Nitin Bahadur
- Re: [PWE3] Should draft-martini-pwe3-iccp-01 be a… Yuji KAMITE
- Re: [PWE3] Should draft-martini-pwe3-iccp-01 be a… frederic.jounay
- Re: [PWE3] Should draft-martini-pwe3-iccp-01 be a… Mallette, Edwin
- Re: [PWE3] Should draft-martini-pwe3-iccp-01 be a… Huub van Helvoort
- Re: [PWE3] Should draft-martini-pwe3-iccp-01 be a… philippe.niger
- Re: [PWE3] Should draft-martini-pwe3-iccp-01 be a… Shahram Davari
- Re: [PWE3] Should draft-martini-pwe3-iccp-01 be a… Simon Delord
- Re: [PWE3] Should draft-martini-pwe3-iccp-01 be a… Satoru Matsushima
- Re: [PWE3] Should draft-martini-pwe3-iccp-01 be a… Luca Martini
- Re: [PWE3] Should draft-martini-pwe3-iccp-01 be a… Stewart Bryant