Re: [rtcweb] Conclusion statement for Recommended Audio Codecs call

Hi,

We chairs was considering inclusion in draft-ietf-webrtc-audio, but we
didn't have any strong opinions on this. Based on that several WG
participants thinks this should be an independent document, I thus
decided that we will start out with an independent document. If the WG
feels differently later we can always fold the text into the audio codec
and processing requirements document.

I would recommend that the individuals interested in contributing a
codec writes an independent submission with focus on the codec
considerations around the codec(s) they are interested in. Then we can
merge this into a common WG document.

Cheers

Magnus

On 2013-01-27 10:14, Romascanu, Dan (Dan) wrote:
> Hi WG chairs,
> 
> Clarification question: 
> 
>> In lieu of additional normative text, we believe the WG discussion
>> supports the inclusion of a new section on "Additional Relevant Codecs".
> 
> Inclusion where? 
> 
> Thanks and Regards,
> 
> Dan
> 
> 
> 
> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: rtcweb-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:rtcweb-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf
>> Of Cullen Jennings (fluffy)
>> Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2013 6:47 PM
>> To: rtcweb@ietf.org
>> Subject: Re: [rtcweb] Conclusion statement for Recommended Audio Codecs
>> call
>>
>>
>> We have been running a call for consensus regarding Selecting
>> Recommended Audio Codecs.
>>
>> At this point the chairs are calling this as "no WG consensus".
>>
>> We can however note a strong interest in a non-normative listing of
>> potentially important codecs including a description why they should be
>> considered to be supported in WebRTC implementations.
>>
>> In lieu of additional normative text, we believe the WG discussion
>> supports the inclusion of a new section on "Additional Relevant Codecs".
>> That can contain a list of codecs which are relevant in specific
>> contexts, along with a short description of the context for each.
>> Specifically there seems to be interest in understanding the advantages
>> and costs of G.722, AMR, and AMR-WB. We hope that text would broaden
>> understanding of the WebRTC use case contexts.
>>
>> The WG chairs
>> Magnus, Ted and Cullen
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> rtcweb mailing list
>> rtcweb@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb
> _______________________________________________
> rtcweb mailing list
> rtcweb@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb
> 
> 

-- 

Magnus Westerlund

----------------------------------------------------------------------
Multimedia Technologies, Ericsson Research EAB/TVM
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Ericsson AB                | Phone  +46 10 7148287
Färögatan 6                | Mobile +46 73 0949079
SE-164 80 Stockholm, Sweden| mailto: magnus.westerlund@ericsson.com
----------------------------------------------------------------------