IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [rtcweb] WG Last Call: draft-ietf-rtcweb-use-cases-and-requirements-10 - real-time text

worley@ariadne.com (Dale R. Worley) Fri, 01 February 2013 22:44 UTC

Return-Path: <worley@shell01.TheWorld.com>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8C2C221E8050 for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 1 Feb 2013 14:44:09 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.707
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.707 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.273, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1, RCVD_IN_SORBS_WEB=0.619]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id OvBGZrgbP5dS for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 1 Feb 2013 14:44:09 -0800 (PST)
Received: from TheWorld.com (pcls2.std.com [192.74.137.142]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0870821E804E for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Fri, 1 Feb 2013 14:44:08 -0800 (PST)
Received: from shell.TheWorld.com (svani@shell01.theworld.com [192.74.137.71]) by TheWorld.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id r11MhncH015679 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Fri, 1 Feb 2013 17:43:51 -0500
Received: from shell01.TheWorld.com (localhost.theworld.com [127.0.0.1]) by shell.TheWorld.com (8.13.6/8.12.8) with ESMTP id r11Mhmc2922738 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Fri, 1 Feb 2013 17:43:48 -0500 (EST)
Received: (from worley@localhost) by shell01.TheWorld.com (8.13.6/8.13.6/Submit) id r11MhmTi1016963; Fri, 1 Feb 2013 17:43:48 -0500 (EST)
Date: Fri, 01 Feb 2013 17:43:48 -0500
Message-Id: <201302012243.r11MhmTi1016963@shell01.TheWorld.com>
From: worley@ariadne.com
Sender: worley@ariadne.com
To: rtcweb@ietf.org
In-reply-to: <510AF934.2030800@alvestrand.no> (harald@alvestrand.no)
References: <50F97303.4070906@ericsson.com> <5102FE7E.5000109@omnitor.se> <51039976.1000600@alvestrand.no> <51098D5A.4040009@omnitor.se> <510AF934.2030800@alvestrand.no>
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] WG Last Call: draft-ietf-rtcweb-use-cases-and-requirements-10 - real-time text
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 Feb 2013 22:44:09 -0000

> From: Harald Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no>
> 
> FWIW, I strongly object to a couple of formalities here:
> [...]
> - I object to requiring interworking with emergency services.

Can you explain this?  I suspect that you have a specific meaning, but
as I read it, it sounds like "I see no objection if WebRTC does not
interwork with emergency services."  If WebRTC does not interwork with
emergency services, the regulators will crush it.

Dale

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email