IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [rtcweb] WG Last Call: draft-ietf-rtcweb-use-cases-and-requirements-10 - real-time text

Ted Hardie <ted.ietf@gmail.com> Tue, 05 February 2013 14:03 UTC

Return-Path: <ted.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E7C9921F889C for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 5 Feb 2013 06:03:35 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.6
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, NO_RELAYS=-0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id BnfHbgYypzed for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 5 Feb 2013 06:03:35 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-ia0-x22c.google.com (mail-ia0-x22c.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c02::22c]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6E1BF21F87BB for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Tue, 5 Feb 2013 06:03:35 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-ia0-f172.google.com with SMTP id u8so182254iag.3 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Tue, 05 Feb 2013 06:03:35 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:x-received:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id :subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=yF08wVsVSqs+ULGu8aWjzq+9c5tXW///r7Rw6bo60lY=; b=JNjLE8ksKe9QnOTIajsw+rvpaMmsRA/7c7QKZ6AKS5jMgNRRFJDhXugaZWMTdrwe53 g9Ui0KLhH8TBXBcUkeQmEEGYLB6FJIPZspDIVnU3bKVgNb3boc5xTfdFJhO3VyI9p9WG fGfD5VfkWcuszIGWmgCe8tii3kGgzPJnA0elUaU4xvkEmLxou+Al0oXDmvDBRx0AKTaY NckIdS9ZpCtcBCsjkCEtptf4iszlPg6zjpDn+phc4l1Qey6HE23DD12nO/Do/LAkk5XA JK/YvenbFZpzyvQh5RKYuhHUbtxBVE5JJplT1OH7JJSRJFADnqbxeEBFdXxGwMYSuL1O rWUg==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.50.171.36 with SMTP id ar4mr13345991igc.70.1360073014958; Tue, 05 Feb 2013 06:03:34 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.43.135.202 with HTTP; Tue, 5 Feb 2013 06:03:34 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <CABkgnnVVsn74Cff8JtFTUQ1B9NgaU1YYkJ7LmxbyzH2qNVyF0g@mail.gmail.com>
References: <BLU002-W149D09F7296C2465CA4968093030@phx.gbl> <CA+9kkMCkJN5TrUA=UWu1g2D5p_RHcBVu3C1zK323hrrd84n+Rw@mail.gmail.com> <CABkgnnVVsn74Cff8JtFTUQ1B9NgaU1YYkJ7LmxbyzH2qNVyF0g@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 05 Feb 2013 09:03:34 -0500
Message-ID: <CA+9kkMD3usjyB6eKTzgVAdiMeXY7PNZkBMqEpcz5SGkLLO4ZwQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: Ted Hardie <ted.ietf@gmail.com>
To: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Cc: "rtcweb@ietf.org" <rtcweb@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] WG Last Call: draft-ietf-rtcweb-use-cases-and-requirements-10 - real-time text
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Feb 2013 14:03:36 -0000

On Sun, Feb 3, 2013 at 2:05 PM, Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 2 February 2013 18:55, Ted Hardie <ted.ietf@gmail.com> wrote:
>> No, the concrete question is whether the requirement to interwork with
>> emergency services will constrain the design.
>
> I think that Bernard was addressing that question directly.  Namely:
> we do not need to constrain the design for it to be possible to
> provide emergency services.
>
"the design" is not clear here.  If you mean:  it must be possible for
a WebRTC system to be built that connects with emergency services,
then we already agree.  If you mean *all WebRTC applications* must be
buit to interwork with emergency services then we disagree.  There are
clear use cases for games, chat roulette-style casual encounter
systems, and similar that do not have any need for PSTN gateways and
for which emergency services should not be expected.  We can discuss
it more in person at the meeting, but I don't see any reason to
revisit this decision.

Again, my personal view.

Ted

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email