Re: [sipcore] draft-ietf-sipcore-location-conveyance-04

"Thomson, Martin" <Martin.Thomson@andrew.com> Wed, 27 October 2010 04:05 UTC

Return-Path: <Martin.Thomson@andrew.com>
X-Original-To: sipcore@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sipcore@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 734F53A698B for <sipcore@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 26 Oct 2010 21:05:18 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.869
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.869 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.270, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ZSRFrWO4+Cy5 for <sipcore@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 26 Oct 2010 21:05:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from csmailgw1.commscope.com (csmailgw1.commscope.com [198.135.207.244]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A49BF3A698A for <sipcore@ietf.org>; Tue, 26 Oct 2010 21:05:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.86.20.103] ([10.86.20.103]:12730 "EHLO ACDCE7HC2.commscope.com") by csmailgw1.commscope.com with ESMTP id S36640124Ab0J0EHB (ORCPT <rfc822; sipcore@ietf.org>); Tue, 26 Oct 2010 23:07:01 -0500
Received: from SISPE7HC2.commscope.com (10.97.4.13) by ACDCE7HC2.commscope.com (10.86.20.103) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 8.1.436.0; Tue, 26 Oct 2010 23:07:01 -0500
Received: from SISPE7MB1.commscope.com ([fe80::9d82:a492:85e3:a293]) by SISPE7HC2.commscope.com ([fe80::58c3:2447:f977:57c3%10]) with mapi; Wed, 27 Oct 2010 12:06:58 +0800
From: "Thomson, Martin" <Martin.Thomson@andrew.com>
To: Paul Kyzivat <pkyzivat@cisco.com>, "James M. Polk (E-mail)" <jmpolk@cisco.com>, Jon Peterson <jon.peterson@neustar.biz>
Date: Wed, 27 Oct 2010 12:06:55 +0800
Thread-Topic: [sipcore] draft-ietf-sipcore-location-conveyance-04
Thread-Index: Act1d1gRzKKJZTpVSZ+6dmPEC/dzQgAFGUYA
Message-ID: <8B0A9FCBB9832F43971E38010638454F03F31EB0D7@SISPE7MB1.commscope.com>
References: <20101025195020.1DA5A3A68E5@core3.amsl.com> <4CC78202.6090700@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <4CC78202.6090700@cisco.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
acceptlanguage: en-US
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-BCN: Meridius 1000 Version 3.4 on csmailgw1.commscope.com
X-BCN-Sender: Martin.Thomson@andrew.com
Cc: SIPCORE <sipcore@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [sipcore] draft-ietf-sipcore-location-conveyance-04
X-BeenThere: sipcore@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: SIP Core Working Group <sipcore.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sipcore>, <mailto:sipcore-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/sipcore>
List-Post: <mailto:sipcore@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sipcore-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sipcore>, <mailto:sipcore-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Oct 2010 04:05:18 -0000

On 2010-10-27 at 12:36:02, Paul Kyzivat wrote:
> I have never understood why the routing-param is required to be last.
> And as my examples show, its difficult/impossible to enforce this in
> ABNF.	

If "routing-allowed" is mandatory, it IS possible:

    Geolocation-header = "Geolocation" HCOLON Geolocation-value
    Geolocation-value  = [ locationValue [ COMMA locationValue ] COMMA ]
                         routing-param

It's a little strange, but it does work.  Especially if you also add text that states there can be only one GeoLocation header?

(The other thing that I find strange is the fact that there can be zero, one or two locationValue parts.  This is confusing for computer scientists who can only count: zero, one, many.)

--Martin