[Supa] [FORGED] Re: REVISED DRAFT paragraphs on 'future of SUPA WG'
Nevil Brownlee <n.brownlee@auckland.ac.nz> Wed, 29 March 2017 19:19 UTC
Return-Path: <n.brownlee@auckland.ac.nz>
X-Original-To: supa@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: supa@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 827331294DC; Wed, 29 Mar 2017 12:19:48 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.302
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.302 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=auckland.ac.nz
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id LPA0i2BzLa2A; Wed, 29 Mar 2017 12:19:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx4.auckland.ac.nz (mx4.auckland.ac.nz [130.216.125.248]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C6F8E1294CC; Wed, 29 Mar 2017 12:19:45 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=auckland.ac.nz; i=@auckland.ac.nz; q=dns/txt; s=mail; t=1490815186; x=1522351186; h=from:subject:to:references:cc:message-id:date: mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=EmsA9HauG8Jf0NYAb1JPxdZRbZTo4aO7nuMYFc+bNbk=; b=qHJtzjLkFW+oSOKVUEEhTaBY//LeMxkgUs1p5GZ55JoHRhHkEIzqKB+G qCDJ4FfGng/tCHo1vVgwQunS6g5rGAF6X6tG8EnfGGhtIO3NjF8yLBwK3 9OWFdcstQAT2No7Qjlrk0BMD7WWH1ve7t4YCf5CN7gCehb4rgk7YKO1hC o5Ngn3lupbgTVh+Hzspw8bktQ8JJfG90c9Vj9q3xB8F5UWnfiWPOtNR/t fpDpB2AUhdRY1WTMfTWh61bF7TG96rRuplKUhN/co2e5q3LfamOEhhyJh Ju0NWU5CWeABxQ0Lxa+VZ54CsJYYq4WTFn7vWUyfIAdLmu4ukNKMqyG4s A==;
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.36,242,1486378800"; d="scan'208";a="146449625"
X-Ironport-HAT: None - $RELAY-AUTH
X-Ironport-Source: 31.133.142.80 - Outgoing - Outgoing-SSL
Received: from dhcp-8e50.meeting.ietf.org (HELO [31.133.142.80]) ([31.133.142.80]) by mx4-int.auckland.ac.nz with ESMTP; 30 Mar 2017 08:19:43 +1300
From: Nevil Brownlee <n.brownlee@auckland.ac.nz>
To: SUPA list <supa@ietf.org>
References: <f13adb65-d1c0-d9fd-3dfe-984713404a6a@auckland.ac.nz> <b6a001ec-6ba4-c30a-b7a2-71c314f9db1e@auckland.ac.nz> <766bbe5f-4907-4a74-6c38-87f8bfa1475b@cisco.com>
Cc: "supa-chairs@ietf.org" <supa-chairs@ietf.org>
Message-ID: <758e4441-cbde-6b83-d9e6-4679bf275521@auckland.ac.nz>
Date: Thu, 30 Mar 2017 08:19:38 +1300
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.8.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <766bbe5f-4907-4a74-6c38-87f8bfa1475b@cisco.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/supa/jZgajBmXeO5yulTkEg9SN2S-sIg>
Subject: [Supa] [FORGED] Re: REVISED DRAFT paragraphs on 'future of SUPA WG'
X-BeenThere: supa@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This list is to discuss SUPA \(Simplified Use of Policy Abstractions\) related issues." <supa.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/supa>, <mailto:supa-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/supa/>
List-Post: <mailto:supa@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:supa-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/supa>, <mailto:supa-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Mar 2017 19:19:48 -0000
Hi all: I'll get the SUPA minutes online real soon now, but first, here's a brief summary of them ... At the SUPA WG at IETF 98 (Tuesday, 28 March) we discussed the progress of the WG. Benoit (our AD) summed up the situation, pointing out that our drafts are not updated very frequently, and that the SUPA mailing list has been very quiet between meetings. At the meeting the authors of the SUPA Information model and the SUPA Data Model drafts said that those drafts should be ready for WG Last Call by 1 June, so that they could be sent to IESG for approval by about 1 July. After summing up the pros and cons for SUPA continuing, Benoit concluded by saying that the WG will be closed at IETF 99 (Prague, 16 July) unless there is substantive progress on the Information Model and especially on the Data Model drafts by one month before the Prague meeting. 'Substantive progress' here means seeing comments on and/or reviews of these drafts demonstrating that people - outside the small group of authors - have carefully read the drafts, or better, that they are actually using SUPA's Information and Data Models. Cheers, Nevil -- --------------------------------------------------------------------- Nevil Brownlee Computer Science Department | ITS Phone: +64 9 373 7599 x88941 The University of Auckland FAX: +64 9 373 7453 Private Bag 92019, Auckland 1142, New Zealand
- [Supa] [FORGED] Re: REVISED DRAFT paragraphs on '… Nevil Brownlee