Re: [tcmtf] TCMTF-Feedback about a possible BoF in London
Ece Gelal <ece.gelal@airties.com> Thu, 23 January 2014 17:33 UTC
Return-Path: <ece.gelal@airties.com>
X-Original-To: tcmtf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tcmtf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2FE421A0109 for <tcmtf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 23 Jan 2014 09:33:58 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.079
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.079 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_20=-0.001, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ZAAEPFhGoDrc for <tcmtf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 23 Jan 2014 09:33:53 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-we0-f179.google.com (mail-we0-f179.google.com [74.125.82.179]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A4C31A007C for <tcmtf@ietf.org>; Thu, 23 Jan 2014 09:33:50 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-we0-f179.google.com with SMTP id w62so1510006wes.24 for <tcmtf@ietf.org>; Thu, 23 Jan 2014 09:33:49 -0800 (PST)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=FalQqdfmYMMfmkJYx+X/03LVvL5b8Ek6rOyjGrrAPEs=; b=iDXUvN078+ZUZoi58SRGZqp7yHL8aarvHu43HsjDeBdC7X5WhFlMYTdwFUusUS+mD1 bkB3Q6ZPUDO4aUNDlwURzHNIHe8BO6AwXLgjnY3eeV9AtxMyXK+vkSdu1TTN27OphoUq TkMLT+1fw49TKdEJ+SW3X1U2NP6ObS3SEcDWvziFigmHF3Jm2bAT7HhS0G32SCT/zCKo NdQrxz9wpJ2fPKKI8RLaiMgXRvPEv5ypFdQ5yh7I0NBLY5TdgxVCeldh0pgEYoczHMrG /qQPYhed9c6ChJo5JjEvcclGANMPljlHKkwwgzV6ABIol8Rieky6CoRsQJBYZJI3n489 IKmA==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQkqX4aNNxvjDDZE8JvA1msuq5k2yX6oYNp/nHqoZ4yBEDeDCd2mHjdz6/0BjTLJsThJFCpwBSZOP+3/dGEAGKEhqgH2hQ==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.180.102.42 with SMTP id fl10mr165391wib.42.1390498429654; Thu, 23 Jan 2014 09:33:49 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.180.6.230 with HTTP; Thu, 23 Jan 2014 09:33:49 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <52CEE47E.5020804@mti-systems.com>
References: <00c401cefd65$6e8ef570$4bace050$@unizar.es> <8D3D17ACE214DC429325B2B98F3AE712026EF2FF8F@MX15A.corp.emc.com> <004701cf0ccf$4d5826a0$e80873e0$@unizar.es> <B180C070-CA16-47BE-9A43-1F10546426DA@huawei.com> <52CEE47E.5020804@mti-systems.com>
Date: Thu, 23 Jan 2014 19:33:49 +0200
Message-ID: <CALeeKiDuFCHvYYxWS1RrWxoJMqjxHsJJ5rV9PkGag62mCN+7iw@mail.gmail.com>
From: Ece Gelal <ece.gelal@airties.com>
To: Wesley Eddy <wes@mti-systems.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="90e6ba18132af5f2b504f0a6a4eb"
Cc: "tcmtf@ietf.org" <tcmtf@ietf.org>, Tina TSOU <Tina.Tsou.Zouting@huawei.com>, "Black, David" <david.black@emc.com>, Jose Saldana <jsaldana@unizar.es>, "tsv-area@ietf.org" <tsv-area@ietf.org>, Luigi Iannone <ggx@gigix.net>, Martin Stiemerling <mls.ietf@googlemail.com>
Subject: Re: [tcmtf] TCMTF-Feedback about a possible BoF in London
X-BeenThere: tcmtf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Tunneling Compressed Multiplexed Traffic Flows \(TCMTF\) discussion list" <tcmtf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tcmtf>, <mailto:tcmtf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tcmtf/>
List-Post: <mailto:tcmtf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tcmtf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcmtf>, <mailto:tcmtf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 23 Jan 2014 17:33:58 -0000
*>> If there are people willing to write the specs *and* people are also able to express interest in writing/deploying/selling code and products that use those specs, then we should certainly be doingthis work in the IETF.* To follow up on Wesley's comment above, as AirTies we *are* interested in writing/deploying code and selling products including this code. We believe that significant performance improvements in the home network can be achieved by multiplexing small-payload packets into a greater one. In particular in the wireless environment where nodes contend for channel access, even multiplexing two packets reduces the effort for accessing the channel by half. We think that any company that is focused on improving the Wi-Fi performance for various applications would be excited about TCM-TF. Regards, Ece On Thu, Jan 9, 2014 at 8:03 PM, Wesley Eddy <wes@mti-systems.com> wrote: > On 1/8/2014 7:49 PM, Tina TSOU wrote: > > Dear all, > > I'm in favor of having a BoF in London, as the following problem > > statement seems valid and needs protocol work in IETF. > > ... > > I'm in agreement as well. Parts of the problem statement and the > scope of the work might still be tweakable, but I think that > overall there is important work for the IETF to do in this area. > > Due to the things Tina described very well, there will be (and are) > products available that attempt to optimize traffic in poorly > documented and often poorly conceived ways. These can do more harm > and have other mysterious effects on traffic than whatever this > working group would create, since it would provide open specifications > that could be developed and tested against the concerns of relevant > layers and other IETF protocols, and problems and concerns could be > addressed. > > If there are people willing to write the specs *and* people are > also able to express interest in writing/deploying/selling code and > products that use those specs, then we should certainly be doing > this work in the IETF. > > This will allow: > - multiple vendor boxes to interoperate on different sides of a > challenged network/link (currently this is beyond the state of > the art!) > - simplified/standardized management of such boxes > - well-understood behavior profiles of such middleboxes and their > protocols algorithms > > If the IETF does not do this work, then I don't believe any of those > three benefits/results are likely at all, and the (poor) status quo > will continue. > > -- > Wes Eddy > MTI Systems > _______________________________________________ > tcmtf mailing list > tcmtf@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcmtf > -- Ece Gelal, PhD Product Manager AirTies Wireless Networks (www.airties.com) M: +90 (533) 431 2773 E: ece.gelal@airties.com Information in this email including any attachments may be privileged, confidential and is intended exclusively for the addressee. The views expressed may not be official policy, but the personal views of the originator. If you have received it in error, please notify the sender by return e-mail and delete it from your system. You should not reproduce, distribute, store, retransmit, use or disclose its contents to anyone. -- Information in this email including any attachments may be privileged, confidential and is intended exclusively for the addressee. The views expressed may not be official policy, but the personal views of the originator. If you have received it in error, please notify the sender by return e-mail and delete it from your system. You should not reproduce, distribute, store, retransmit, use or disclose its contents to anyone.
- [tcmtf] TCMTF-Feedback about a possible BoF in Lo… Jose Saldana
- Re: [tcmtf] TCMTF-Feedback about a possible BoF i… MANUEL NUÑEZ SANZ
- Re: [tcmtf] TCMTF-Feedback about a possible BoF i… JUAN ANTONIO CASTELL LUCIA
- Re: [tcmtf] TCMTF-Feedback about a possible BoF i… Black, David
- Re: [tcmtf] TCMTF-Feedback about a possible BoF i… Jose Saldana
- Re: [tcmtf] TCMTF-Feedback about a possible BoF i… Luigi Iannone
- Re: [tcmtf] TCMTF-Feedback about a possible BoF i… Jose Saldana
- Re: [tcmtf] TCMTF-Feedback about a possible BoF i… Tina TSOU
- Re: [tcmtf] TCMTF-Feedback about a possible BoF i… FERNANDO PASCUAL BLANCO
- Re: [tcmtf] TCMTF-Feedback about a possible BoF i… Wesley Eddy
- Re: [tcmtf] TCMTF-Feedback about a possible BoF i… Mehmet Karaca (Alumni)
- Re: [tcmtf] TCMTF-Feedback about a possible BoF i… Ece Gelal