Re: [tcpm] poll for adopting draft-gont-tcp-security

David Borman <dab@weston.borman.com> Thu, 30 July 2009 12:46 UTC

Return-Path: <dab@weston.borman.com>
X-Original-To: tcpm@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tcpm@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 95EB428C1D9 for <tcpm@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 30 Jul 2009 05:46:35 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id su2itmxZ9ztN for <tcpm@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 30 Jul 2009 05:46:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.wrs.com (mail.windriver.com [147.11.1.11]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D74743A7191 for <tcpm@ietf.org>; Thu, 30 Jul 2009 05:46:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ALA-MAIL03.corp.ad.wrs.com (ala-mail03 [147.11.57.144]) by mail.wrs.com (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id n6UCkXRJ026361; Thu, 30 Jul 2009 05:46:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ala-mail06.corp.ad.wrs.com ([147.11.57.147]) by ALA-MAIL03.corp.ad.wrs.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Thu, 30 Jul 2009 05:46:33 -0700
Received: from dhcp-53da.meeting.ietf.org ([147.11.233.22]) by ala-mail06.corp.ad.wrs.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Thu, 30 Jul 2009 05:46:33 -0700
Message-Id: <C066279D-680C-4E29-B289-5AB1364D2453@weston.borman.com>
From: David Borman <dab@weston.borman.com>
To: tcpm Extensions WG <tcpm@ietf.org>
In-Reply-To: <C304DB494AC0C04C87C6A6E2FF5603DB2217B28763@NDJSSCC01.ndc.nasa.gov>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"; format="flowed"; delsp="yes"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v935.3)
Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2009 14:46:31 +0200
References: <C304DB494AC0C04C87C6A6E2FF5603DB2217B28763@NDJSSCC01.ndc.nasa.gov>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.935.3)
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 30 Jul 2009 12:46:33.0794 (UTC) FILETIME=[C4D6C220:01CA1113]
Cc: tsv-ads@tools.ietf.org
Subject: Re: [tcpm] poll for adopting draft-gont-tcp-security
X-BeenThere: tcpm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: TCP Maintenance and Minor Extensions Working Group <tcpm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpm>, <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tcpm>
List-Post: <mailto:tcpm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpm>, <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2009 12:46:35 -0000

Based on the response to this poll, and the subsequent discussion at  
the IETF meeting this week, there is clear consensus to take this on  
as a WG item.  We will be kicking off various discussions in separate  
messages to the TCPM list.

	-David Borman & Wes Eddy, TCPM co-chairs


On Jun 24, 2009, at 9:25 PM, Eddy, Wesley M. (GRC-MS00)[Verizon] wrote:

> TCPMers, there was a thread a while ago about working on
> draft-gont-tcp-security in this working group that didn't
> conclusively give us a feeling one way or other:
> http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tcpm/current/msg04489.html
>
> Basically, my understanding is that there are at least a
> handful of people in the WG that think it should be done
> here as a WG item (more likely for Informational rather
> than BCP), and there are also some expressed opinions on
> why it shouldn't.
>
> Given the raw size of the document, if the WG intends to
> take this document on, then we need some people to clearly
> commit to putting cycles into review and contributions to
> the document.  Since it is quite large, and to my knowledge,
> there hasn't been a specific technical review of the content
> on this list, but just discussions about if the idea in
> general is a good or bad thing, we still need to know if
> people are willing to invest their time and energy in this.
>
> Please let us know if there is traction for this in the
> near term, and/or we can also discuss it in Stockholm.
>
> ---------------------------
> Wes Eddy
> Network & Systems Architect
> Verizon FNS / NASA GRC
> Office: (216) 433-6682
> ---------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> tcpm mailing list
> tcpm@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpm