IETF Logo Mail Archive

[Teas] Regarding IPR on draft-ietf-teas-p2mp-loose-path-reopt

Vishnu Pavan Beeram <vishnupavan@gmail.com> Sun, 02 October 2016 12:28 UTC

Return-Path: <vishnupavan@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: teas@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: teas@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD8E712B0C7; Sun, 2 Oct 2016 05:28:05 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.699
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.699 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id lnuzusdDnLa7; Sun, 2 Oct 2016 05:28:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-vk0-x22d.google.com (mail-vk0-x22d.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400c:c05::22d]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3736012B02D; Sun, 2 Oct 2016 05:28:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-vk0-x22d.google.com with SMTP id z126so139885463vkd.0; Sun, 02 Oct 2016 05:28:04 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=wgVnuYaU9WKDbwWafa7Ch7FVNIzDSgKUND3jbJxJ4Rk=; b=iUdpXxNTygGIV40uElHg26nPpzlxUJdMaus3ZxRYcbSlQrTAsldb+Eu4Vj0P8FRXX9 AyIzUrbiZS5LlJZ6lyUMvmlbknatCSEJs+gmBrqhS1DXAy5Ji7G9DPW2YAcOjsqFljS9 7Y5BEqFAyrSb1WJ6tmIznsgdfdAfGEOlQV0pVftr0Y2ZajMZDCXb1O0dSjvFhztJobRe ouChJOgckXZbFCx8di1BHySPyBvtVVJoGtxS8wsrKsxX13f0sE7iJT3k2QzEE1FM3mTU +FwoQOzBSSS+nNwP7ap3cnneyGn5f+d9xHjJj1Au/iiEiu5l4ellddXZ2UCvKvMnGzIM m5Jw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=wgVnuYaU9WKDbwWafa7Ch7FVNIzDSgKUND3jbJxJ4Rk=; b=Cj1+o8CcTAQ9kgV3cALMRAGBslPXJaoMzV0XX4NFHYaEhbwOErrtSPYxGGYPEjRpi8 IiaHtgImgpNo+ETlfsB6iE5N0DYDYEtUFw4F0dN1ETvwuh1bXy57vKshxG0PagtV9twT HVC2JvUOhcECyuXvdYtUTt1UA7tp7fPRNKQRFmoFcdkrXOgPX57f6MMAT85efT6Q45Gh hvQtnyM0LYPRJ2hFrLVYfSyVLxza+R11pCxMiofbOF+YaNs0imoeyZch9fsgdB+TTmJm qVRzPtKBgcKwS/SQJR1VQYpQgRNF2RfQckuBph4Hniaus/yam32PTVymr+DVHjX+K91J Zprw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AA6/9RmfnAo5FNHQlrtLc8aVTQFNrStOOMoKe8JEXXUeKTd38hQB8CxVsmGA6lCc/66Jc1HqhHj05JKwnxzBiw==
X-Received: by 10.31.9.20 with SMTP id 20mr9022808vkj.99.1475411283321; Sun, 02 Oct 2016 05:28:03 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.31.151.148 with HTTP; Sun, 2 Oct 2016 05:28:02 -0700 (PDT)
From: Vishnu Pavan Beeram <vishnupavan@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 02 Oct 2016 08:28:02 -0400
Message-ID: <CA+YzgTvk7n5eDjTB=cjQL+pAQajHCNcD3_G2zeBW6t1BZMCfPQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Tarek Saad (tsaad)" <tsaad@cisco.com>, "Rakesh Gandhi (rgandhi)" <rgandhi@cisco.com>, "Zafar Ali (zali)" <zali@cisco.com>, robert.h.venator.civ@mail.mil, y.kamite@ntt.com
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a1144072e70ac63053de0f5ba"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/teas/lPFEER7E-3PwHz3BKA-rnuUBl6Q>
Cc: TEAS WG Chairs <teas-chairs@ietf.org>, "teas@ietf.org" <teas@ietf.org>
Subject: [Teas] Regarding IPR on draft-ietf-teas-p2mp-loose-path-reopt
X-BeenThere: teas@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Traffic Engineering Architecture and Signaling working group discussion list <teas.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/teas>, <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/teas/>
List-Post: <mailto:teas@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/teas>, <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 02 Oct 2016 12:28:05 -0000

Authors, Contributors, WG,

As part of the preparation for WG Last Call

Are you aware of any IPR that applies to draft identified above?

Please state either:

"No, I'm not aware of any IPR that applies to this draft"
or
"Yes, I'm aware of IPR that applies to this draft"

If so, has this IPR been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules
(see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for more details)?

If yes to the above, please state either:

"Yes, the IPR has been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules"
or
"No, the IPR has not been disclosed"

If you answer no, please provide any additional details you think
appropriate.

If you are listed as a document author or contributor please answer the
above by responding to this email regardless of whether or not you are
aware of any relevant IPR. This document will not advance to the next
stage until a response has been received from each author and listed
contributor. NOTE: THIS APPLIES TO ALL OF YOU LISTED IN THIS MESSAGE'S
TO LINES.

If you are on the WG email list or attend WG meetings but are not listed
as an author or contributor, we remind you of your obligations under
the IETF IPR rules which encourages you to notify the IETF if you are
aware of IPR of others on an IETF contribution, or to refrain from
participating in any contribution or discussion related to your
undisclosed IPR. For more information, please see the RFCs listed above
and
http://trac.tools.ietf.org/group/iesg/trac/wiki/IntellectualProperty.

Thank you,
TEAS WG Chairs

PS Please include all listed in the headers of this message in your
response.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email