I2RS meeting - IETF 101 - London 
Date 3/19/2018
time: 9:30-10:30am. 

Alia Atlas (AD) acted on behalf of the chairs. 
[Susan Hares was ill.  Russ White was delayed due to travel.] 

Alia reported on the status of the remaining documents.
https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/101/materials/slides-101-i2rs-chairs-slides-00

- 3 WG Document in IETF LC (RIB Model, RIB Informational Model, and DC fabric) 

Ephemeral datastore model will goes to rtgwg.  
The security requirements document is not going to be published. 


3 WG Document in IETF LC

ietf-i2rs-yang-l2-network-topology to be handled by Martin as new AD.

Status: 
Chris Hopps:  There are a few issues such as document defines features it does not use.
Not fully ready to go as is.  It defines features that it does not use.  Should it do this? 
The encaps like ATMs that it does not use.  The  

ephemeral datastore model to go to RTGWG


draft-ietf-i2rs-security-environment-reqs-06 will not be progressed.

Alia: I had intended to close the WG at this meeting. 
We'll have to see if the responses are quick or if this document needs to 
move the rtgwg working. 

Chris H.: At DT, we are have suggestions for the topology models. 
Is there any room for clean-up or re-working. For example, if 
have use for l2-network-topology model but notifications
are quite generic. Is there any room for rework of the general 
topology models to add this. 

Alia: I expect that you could rework these models in L2 

Chris H: We could suggest the notifications be moved to a more generic model. 
Perhaps, we could do a bis on the topology models. 

Alia: could happen in rtgwg if it makes senses.

Alia: thank you all for your hard work.  We've made the impact we needed to have the
I2RS interface work. The ability to go forward with these type of models. 
The model notifications 

Time to celebrate!