Ronald in 't Velt (chair): This short session mainly doc status update, nothing more due to Stan's passing In rfc queue is the - dlep-lid-ext, Stan Ratliff and Rick Taylor Approved - dlep-latency-ext - has some technical fixed needed and has been that was for over 100 days WGLC - credit-flow, credit-ext, traffic-class - Expired at the beginning of Sept. - One author, Lou Berger revived these I-Ds this morning - Not a lot of comments during extended WGLC Lou Berger: - made changes when comments came in, but did not push - it has been a while, should go through them Ron: - newer content than what expired? Lou: - yes, it's just been a while Ron: - propose new wglc - 2-3 weeks from now - Ron acting as shepherd to documents Future of WG: - Lou Berger's presentation on DLEP multicast at IETF-105 - dlep-multicast I-D by January 2020 - Lou taking over from Stan - Ron willing to help as he finds it personally interesting Lou: - collaberating with Dave Wiggins - wanted to push for 106, but decided against it - first draft soon to Ron - implementation details in one draft rather than second draft - no need to do now, but do offline Ron: - no other pending I-Ds - looking at charter Lou: - 2-3 meetings ago agreed to have a adopting call for a 4th doc - ethernet-flow-control - might been a year ago to do it Rick Taylor: - split out? Lou: - appendix as example, made it new doc - things happened, now waiting - dont want to wait another cycle Ron: - no need to wait - go to mailing list for adoption - charter mentions multicast work - document challenges, best practices? - not much happening in that area, what do we do? - obliged to address these? Rick: - was working with Stan on dlep-extension for SMF PIM - early days Alvaro Retana (responsible AD): - asked: do what is in charter? - ideally yes, do what WG wants - compromise with other work (specific item) - at time there was interest... Ron: - question mailing list? - anyone interested? Rick - confession: actively working on multicast at work - looked at SMF - look at stuff coming out of PIM - unconvinced what we doing is manet unique - PIMish? picking out the tree - tweak to work with manets? - if wrote up would take back to PIM - others were looking at SMF but they are not here anymore Alvaro: - same point, last bullet - discuss where do we go? - new items, look at old stuff? Stu Card: - precise words in charter: - WILL do liason with PIM - WILL do multicast with SMF - conflict built right in Rick: - SMF, industry thinks its ready to go - it's experimental RFC about flooding, not a solution - danger if manet stop people will think its good enough - manet specific topics are being picked up at link layer - if go down multicast route it would be about maintaing multicast heterogenous link layer technology manets - that drifts into PIM - don't have answer Ron: - don't want to go into deep technical now - personally interested, but we will take to list - need to get more energy - talking with AD - couple of ideas, bring back OLSR work - rename to DLEP WG almost - personal idea on new DLEP data item - need to check if it holds water - write up and have ready sometime in January - Ron presentation on inter-manet routing at 105 - outside charter scope - at 105, ppl showed interest - someone outside group also interested and encouraged to take to mailing list, yet to do so - would need to recharter - need evidence that people are doing work for that to happen - Interim meeting, end of January, early Februrary 2020? - need to mull over what to do next with WG - do interim well before Vancouver but still allow for work to happen Rick: - timing is good and makes a lot of sense Lou: - virtual or physical? Ron: - virtual! - end of agenda - AOB? Alvaro: - one thing, need to be at bar in 3 minutes - will say something at plenary about Stan - near the end before open mic Ron: - with that, meeting adjourned