SNA NAU Services MIB (snanau)
NOTE: This charter is a snapshot of that in effect at the time of
the 38th IETF Meeting in Memphis, Tennessee. It may now be out-of-date.
Chair(s):
Robert Moore <remoore@ralvm6.vnet.ibm.com>
Routing Area Director(s):
Joel Halpern <jhalpern@newbridge.com>
Mailing Lists:
General Discussion:snanaumib@external.cisco.com
To Subscribe: snanaumib-request@cisco.com
Archive: ftp://ftp.cisco.com/snanaumib/mail-archive
Description of Working Group:
The SNA NAU MIB Working Group is chartered to define a set of managed
objects for SNA Network Accessible Units. These includes PUs (Physical
Units) such as type 2.0 and 2.1 and LUs (Logical Units) such as type 1,
2, 3, and 6.2. These objects will be the minimum necessary to provide the
ability to monitor and control those devices, providing fault, configuration,
and performance management, and will be consistent with the SNMP framework
and existing SNMP standards.
The working group has completed the MIBs for base SNA NAU functions
and advanced functions for LU Type 6.2 or APPC (Advanced Program-to-Program
Communication). With the exception of the current work in enhancing the
SNA NAU MIB, the focus of the working group will be developing two additional
MIBs for managing APPN (Advanced Peer-to-Peer Networking) and HPR (High
Performance Routing) nodes.
The working group will make sure that its work is aligned with the SNA
DLC MIB Working Group, due to the close relationship between the devices
being worked on by the two groups.
Goals and Milestones:
|
Done |
|
Begin discussion of proprietary MIBS and develop a single proposal. |
|
Done |
|
Post an Internet-Draft of the SNA NAU Services MIB. |
|
Done |
|
Submit the SNA NAU Services MIB to the IESG for consideration as a Proposed
Standard. |
|
Done |
|
Post proprietary MIB modules. |
|
Done |
|
Develop and post a single proposal for structure of the MIB module. |
|
Done |
|
Meet at IETF to review proposed structure/walk through. |
|
Done |
|
Post Internet-Draft of the APPC MIB. |
|
Done |
|
Post second Internet-Draft of APPC MIB. |
|
Done |
|
Meet at IETF to review MIB (if necessary). |
|
Done |
|
Achieve consensus on the final Internet-Draft. |
|
Mar 96 |
|
Post Internet-Draft of the APPN MIB. |
|
Mar 96 |
|
Update Internet-Draft of SNA NAU MIB with corrections and changes reflecting
implementation experiences. |
|
Apr 96 |
|
Submit the APPC MIB Internet-Draft to the IESG for consideration as
a Proposed Standard. |
|
Apr 96 |
|
Submit revised APPN MIB to as an Internet-Draft. |
|
May 96 |
|
Achieve consensus on the new SNA NAU MIB Internet-Draft. |
|
Jun 96 |
|
Submit APPN MIB Internet-Draft to IESG for consideration as a Proposed
Standard. |
|
Jun 96 |
|
Post Internet-Draft of HPR MIB. |
|
Jul 96 |
|
Submit the SNA NAU MIB Internet-Draft to the IESG for consideration
as a Proposed Standard. |
|
Jul 96 |
|
Submit revised HPR MIB as an Internet-Draft. |
|
Aug 96 |
|
Submit HPR MIB Internet-Draft to IESG for consideration as a Proposed
Standard. |
Internet-Drafts:
· Definitions of Managed Objects for APPN
· Definitions of Managed Objects for HPR
· Definitions of Managed Objects for DLUR
Request For Comments:
|
RFC |
Status |
Title |
|
|
RFC1665 |
PS |
Definitions of Managed Objects for SNA NAUs using SMIv2 |
|
RFC1666 |
PS |
Definitions of Managed Objects for SNA NAUs using SMIv2 |
|
RFC2051 |
PS |
Definitions of Managed Objects for APPC |
Current Meeting Report
The Working Group did not meet.
Slides
None Received
