Minutes of the Message Tracking MIB (msgmib) BOF
IESG rejected the original charter because of its reliance on SNMP.
Q: do we want to generalize this for other types of messaging?
A: start w/ 822, expand later.
June 1 model draft
August 1 revise model draft
42nd IETF discuss protocol, finish model
October 15 final draft of model, first draft of protocol
November 25 revised draft of protocol
43rd IETF discuss protocol
February 1 final draft of protocol
Feedback: emphasize security
Msg tracking model - complexity levels
Level 1 - administrative access, small # of secrets
Level 2 - originators of own msg authentication for msg originators may require public key/private key for people w/o a close relationship to the MTA, while msg originators with a close relationship may be able to use a simpler authentication mechanism, such as SASL.
Level 3 - msg recipients
go to list