Routing Information Protocol (rip)

This Working Group did not meet

NOTE: This charter is a snapshot of the 54th IETF Meeting in Yokohama, Japan. It may now be out-of-date.

Last Modifield: 04/17/2002

Chair(s):
G. Malkin <gmalkin@avici.com>
Routing Area Director(s):
Bill Fenner <fenner@research.att.com>
Alex Zinin <zinin@psg.com>
Routing Area Advisor:
Bill Fenner <fenner@research.att.com>
Mailing Lists:
General Discussion: ietf-rip@baynetworks.com
To Subscribe: ietf-rip-request@baynetworks.com
In Body: subscribe ietf-rip
Archive: ftp://xylogics.com/pub/users/gmalkin/rip/rip-arc
Description of Working Group:
The RIP Working Group was formed from the RIP Version 2 Working Group, which was originally chartered to create the RIP-2 standard. Since several other RIP-related efforts are also occuring within the IETF, it was decided to create a single working group to handle them all.

The RIP Working Group is chartered to guide the following proposals and develop the following projects through the IETF standards track:

- ``RIP Version 2'' (RFC 1723)

- ``RIP Version 2 MIB Extension'' (RFC 1724)

- ``Extensions to RIP to Support Demand Circuits'' (RFC 1582)

- ``RIP-II Cryptographic Authentication'' (Internet-Draft)

Additionally, the RIP Working Group will handle the RIPng protocol which, in its first incarnation, will contain the minimum modifications to RIP-2 necessary to handle IPng.

Goals and Milestones:
Done  Submit RIPng as an Internet-Draft.
Done  Submit Internet-Draft of MD5 Proposal.
Done  Meet at San Jose IETF to discuss MD5 document.
Done  Submit MD5 document to IESG for consideration as a Proposed Standard.
Done  Meet at Danvers IETF to discuss implementation of all RIP-related specifications.
Done  Submit Demand Circuit RIP document (RFC 1581) to IESG for consideration as a Draft Standard.
Done  Submit RIPng Internet-Draft for consideration as a Proposed Standard. Submission MUST be accompanied by a suitably restrictive Applicability Statement.
Done  Meet at Stockholm IETF. Review status of MD5 for elevation to Draft Standard. Review status of RIP-2 and MIB for elevation to Standard. A suitably restrictive Applicability Statement for RIP-2 MUST accompany the request for standards level elevation.
APR 97  Submit the RIP2 protocol and MIN to the IESG for Standard. Group will then go into hiatus waiting for other documents to spend the necessary periods of time at their current standards level prior to elevation in the standards track.
No Current Internet-Drafts
Request For Comments:
RFCStatusTitle
RFC1923 I RIPv1 Applicability Statement for Historic Status
RFC2081 I RIPng Protocol Applicability Statement
RFC2080 PS RIPng for IPv6
RFC2091 PS Triggered Extensions to RIP to Support Demand Circuits
RFC2092 I Protocol Analysis for Triggered RIP

Current Meeting Report

None received.

Slides

None received.