ipcdn-0----Page:21
1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  21  22  23  24  25  26  27  28  29  30  31  32  33  34  35  36  37  38  39  40  41  42 

RFIv2 MIB Technical Comments, pending

DocsisUpstreamType and DocsisUpstreamTypeStatus TCs
Comment: Almost same TCs
Create compliance statement to indicate UpstreamType “minus tdmaAndAtdma” for docsIfCmStatusModulationType

docsIfUpChannelScdmaActiveCodes
Comment: exclude prime numbers from SYNTAX:
67,71,73,79,83,89,97,101,103,107,109,113,127
Syntax will be :
SYNTAX Unsigned32
(0|64..66|68..70|72|74..78|80..82|84..88|90..96|98..100|102|104..106|108|110..112|114..126|128)

docsIfSigQMicroreflections, docsIfCmtsCmStatusMicroreflections, docsIfSigQMicroreflections
Comment: Is valid to say “SHOULD”?
ID-13 says “should” –lowercase-, moreover, “should” could be taken out.
“This object is not assumed to return an absolutely
accurate value, but should gives a rough indication
of microreflections received on this interface.



PPT Version