RFIv2 MIB Technical Comments, pending DocsisUpstreamType and DocsisUpstreamTypeStatus TCs Comment: Almost same TCs Create compliance statement to indicate UpstreamType “minus tdmaAndAtdma” for docsIfCmStatusModulationType docsIfUpChannelScdmaActiveCodes Comment: exclude prime numbers from SYNTAX: 67,71,73,79,83,89,97,101,103,107,109,113,127 Syntax will be : SYNTAX Unsigned32 (0|64..66|68..70|72|74..78|80..82|84..88|90..96|98..100|102|104..106|108|110..112|114..126|128) docsIfSigQMicroreflections, docsIfCmtsCmStatusMicroreflections, docsIfSigQMicroreflections Comment: Is valid to say “SHOULD”? ID-13 says “should” –lowercase-, moreover, “should” could be taken out. “This object is not assumed to return an absolutely accurate value, but should gives a rough indication of microreflections received on this interface. |