Email Address Internationalization

Agenda at IETF-66

Room: 518AB.

WG Chairs: Harald Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no>
Xiaodong Lee <lee@cnnic.cn>

1.Agenda Bashing(Chair, 5 minutes)
1) Comments to agenda
2) Minutes Scribe for meeting
3) Jabber Scriber

2. Documents Status(Chair, 5 minutes)

3. Active Drafts Review(65 minutes)
1)draft-ietf-eai-framework-01.txt (J. Klensin)(5 minutes)
http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-eai-framework-01.txt

2) draft-ietf-eai-scenarios-01.txt (J. Klensin does for Harald)(5 minutes)
http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-eai-scenarios-01.txt

3) draft-ietf-eai-smtpext-00.txt (J. Yao)(5 minutes)
http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-eai-smtpext-00.txt

4) Testing Report by CNNIC (J.Yao)(5 minutes)

5)draft-ietf-eai-utf8headers-00.txt (N. Hsu)(5 minutes)
http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-eai-utf8headers-00.txt

6) Testing Report by TWNIC (N. Hsu)(5 minutes)

7) draft-ietf-eai-imap-utf8-00.txt (P. Resnick)(5 minutes)
http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-eai-imap-utf8-00.txt

8)draft-ietf-eai-mailinglist-00.txt (Edmon Chung)(10 minutes)
http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-eai-mailinglist-00.txt

9)draft-ietf-eai-pop-00.txt(Chris Newman)(5 minutes) no presentation, only 
comments for draft
http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-eai-pop-00.txt

10)draft-ietf-eai-downgrade-01.txt ( K. Fujiwara)(15 minutes)
http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-eai-downgrade-01.txt

5. Outstanding issues (45 minutes)
1) ATOMIC issues, Do we need ATOMIC? and if ATOMIC (or equivalent) are 
permitted, is the combination of ATOMIC and ALT-ADDRESS (i) an error or (ii) an 
indication that ATOMIC should essentially be ignored.
2) Is the syntax for 'alt address' in the envelope to use 2821
   parameters or some trick inside the pointed brackets?  How about
   inside the headers?
3) Do we need new extended error codes to cover the bouncing and
   downgrade cases?
4) Encapsulation Model issue. Do we really have a satisfactory model for 
encapsulation yet?
5) Terminology unification