IETF 66 DNA Working Group Minutes
THURSDAY, July 13, 2006 
1510-1610 Afternoon Session II
Room 519B

Minute Takers: Shinta Sugimoto and Michael Richardson

 * WG document status
   ==================

 * draft-ietf-dna-link-information-03
   ==================================

 - Treatment of link down information
  - [JA]: Link down issue was main concern. It seems that we don't
    need that right now.  Link up information seems to be enough.
    Suggest to move on without link down.  Link down could be
    written in another document.
  - [AY]: Agree that there is not much use case for link down.
    However, some documents from other WGs may require link down
    information.
  - [TN]: Link down is poorly understood. Suggest to take it out
    and move on. More understanding is needed.
  - [AY]: FMIPv6 spec is mentioning link down, for instance. If
    the link down information is removed from the document, the
    title may need to be changed.
  - [JA]: That's fine.
  Chair's note: If the link down has to be removed from the document
  the document needs to be renamed to better reflect its content 
  e.g. draft-ietf-dna-link-up-00 


 * draft-ietf-dna-network-00
   =========================

 - Document name was renamed and the document went through some
   reviews.
   Chair's note: The document needs to be restructured since many 
   reviews mentioned that the document did not flow well.


 * draft-ietf-dna-frd-01
   =====================

 - A few security issues are left. Solutions are ready. Review is
  required. Go for informational document.

 * Combined DNA draft discussion
   =============================

 - [GD] There have been many DNA Solutions (4 documents). The WG agreed
   to combine these solutions into one and produce a single protocol
   document.

 - [SK] Need to solve administrative issues, namely author list. Should
   give credit to contributors. A single editor and the rest shall
   be acknowledged in somewhere (Acknowledgement section ?) in the
   document.

 - [JC] No problems with the author list. Can sort this out easily

 - [SK] We are going to be taking the last 2 bits in the IPv6 RA flags field.
   Need to consult with the IPv6 chairs and the ADs to figure out the right
   course of action.
 
 - [TN]  IPv6 WG is still available and the mailing list is there. Discussion
   should be made there.

 - [HS]: MIPSHOP WG is also planning to extend the RA flag.
   Coordination is needed.
   -  Who should take care of the RA flag issue ? IESG ? No.

 - [GD] Maintaining prefix list is the core procedure. Skeleton of the
   texts describing the prefix list management will be provided.

 - [JC] Think that the resulting document can be simplified a lot, if it
   is done this way.

 - [GD] Document name is TBD (draft-ietf-dna-protocol ?).

 New milestones
 ==============

 Chairs discussed with the AD about the new milestones.

 - [TN]: Send protocol document before next IETF (November) to the
   IESG?  Considering necessary steps to take, current plan seems
   to be aggressive.

 - [TN]: Along with internal review, external review should would
  be nice. Review by 3 or 4 people outside the WG would be good.

 - [GD & SK]: All technical problems are solved. But considering the review 
   period, maybe we will come up with a more realistic milestone.


Initials of name of the person on mike:

 AY: Alper Yegin
 GD: Greg Daley
 HS: Hesham Soliman
 JA: Jari Arkko
 JC: Jin Hyeock Choi
 SK: Suresh Krishnan
 TN: Thomas Narten