v6ops-5----Page:9
1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9 

FAQ
Why not use v4/v6 tunneling instead of NAT?
tunneling would require a v4 address, which we may not have, not even in the 10/8 range
Why not simply use double IPv4 NAT?
same as above, 10/8 is too small for large deployments
Why not deploy the home v6-only and translate directly to v4 in the home gateway?
Will not help the legacy Win 9x boxes in the home
What about new v6-only host trying to reach the v4 Internet?
one problem at a time! Such device do not really exist today….
suggestion: use v6/v4 proxies in ISP network

PPT Version