IETF 73 ENUM session
Minneapolis, MN
====================

Agenda bashing:
---------------

slides: http://www.ietf.org/proceedings/08nov/slides/enum-2.ppt

There were no objections / additions to the slides


Document status (Alex Mayrhofer)
--------------------------------

slides: http://www.ietf.org/proceedings/08nov/slides/enum-3.ppt

Richard Shockey says it's up to the chairs to get the documents 
through IESG / RFC Editor

Infrastructure ENUM 
-------------------

There were two points on the infrastructure ENUM docs:

- Pasi requested DNAME review by the DNS directorate
- liasion IAB - ITU: The liasion will be sent subsequently to approval 
  of the documents, and will not hold up the publication

held up by DNS directorate review now.

note: should let Rich nag Peter about DNS directorate review

Enumservice registration
------------------------

slides: http://www.ietf.org/proceedings/08nov/slides/enum-0.ppt


Decision (after some discussion): short WGLC, feed back comments until Dec 5, then chairs will decide 
what to do with the comments, if any.


X-Enumservice
-------------

slides: http://www.ietf.org/proceedings/08nov/slides/enum-1.ppt

Alex: suggest to first come first serve, maybe time limits
Brian: Have only bad experience with X-, time limits are interesting experiment
Jim: Just want *some* kind of registry for those X- things. maybe a renewal process
Peter: Don't think we need that kind of thing. "timing experiment" would be another 
creation of an IANA process
Paf: Time limits are interesting - don't expect code to go poof

Jason: as an implementor, you can do that without a registry

(more discussion)

Hum: Clear concensus to let the x-enumservices doc die away.


The meeting closes with a farewell by the co-chairs.