EPPEXT meeting at IETF94 Yokohama 2015-11-05 15:20-17:20 Scott Hollenbeck and Ning Kong as interim chair Both chairs Jim Galvin and Antoin Verschuren in remote participation draft-ietf-eppext-keyrelay draft-eppext-tmch-smd Both are through last call and AD Barry Leiba is currently reviewing, response expected in the coming weeks. draft-ietf-epppext-launchphase Jim Gould updated the document and thinks it is ready for last call. shepherd Ulrich Wisser draft-ietf-eppext-tmch-func-spec-00 shepherd Ulrich Wisser draft-ietf-eppext-idnmap-02 draft-gould-idn-table-02 draft-wilcox-cira-idn-eppext-00 James Gould speaks on these drafts. idnmap needs even idntables as to specify possible table name values. Several of the documents are expired. Renewal is requested or will be directly after the meeting. Documents will become milestones in the new charter. wilcox will be retracted or moved to epp-registry. Jim Galvin presents a list of documents currently in work and will be milestones for the new charter. draft-gould-allocation-token James Goulds speaks on the reasoning behind the extensions. Opposition to use AuthInfo for this purpose draft-gould-change-poll James Gould speaks on the reasoning of the document. Clients get updates on changes to objects through the poll queue. draft-gould-epp-rdap-status-mapping James Gould presents on the reasoning behind the draft. Comments from the room about the question of standards track or informational draft-zhou-eppext-reseller-mapping draft-zhou-eppext-reseller-ext Ning Kong presents Discussions about need for RDAP extension Registrar object suggested with support in the room draft-gould-eppext-verificationcode draft-xie-eppext-nv-mapping James Gould presents IPR disclosure Discussion about adoption of informational documents Hum only for no objection Discussion about documents to include in working group - not draft from Alexander Mayerhofer - Jim proposes to divide docs in groups for the milestones - opposition and support for nv-mapping document. Will be taken to the list when discussing milestones - Hum, no objections to for defining groups of work items to determine milestones - charter presentation and discussions - Several submissions to not broaden the scope of the group to all things ICANN