LIME Minutes 4/5/2016

Scribe: Sanjoy Bardhan <sbardhan@infinera.com>

Status

WG – 4 documents

Update from Ron

Worried about energy in the WG

Progress the 2 YANG models quickly

CO Yang not ready for last call – pretty close – get a virual interim and spin one version and in Berlin  have a last call

CO applicability statement – copy from here into Yang model

CL Yang – spin another version by next IETF

CL applicability – get new data

Carlos

Success of the group – customers use the model – protocol specific OAM

Created a wiki – tracking all the protocols

In the wiki want to see more –

• Most of the folks are using old drafts – need to capture what is being used
• Capture all dependent YANG models

LIME CO OAM Yang Model Update

• Split Generic model in to  CO and CL models
• CO
• Removed IPv4 and IPv6 from CO
• Included TRILL and MPLS TP
• Comments
• Greg (Ericsson)
• Location of test points that define the path and operation and state
• Try to do some abstraction between CO and CL
• Information necessary for the client layer to the server layer
• Ron request – post to mail list with the suggestion

CL OAM Yang Model – Qin WU

• Discussed the CL OAM Model Design
• Comments
• Greg (Ericsson)
• BFD Yang model adopted by BFD WG – would this be duplication of effort ?  - LIME is specific generic – authors need to coordinate
• Deepak
• Working with BFD WG
• ??
• UP/DN/Intermediate attribute – need to figure to incorporate or not
• Ron
• If 2 technologies  have the same attributes should we try to make it common
• More collaboration is needed
• Have not consider Performance management  – we can add them and bring to the ML
• Carlos
• All 3 - PM, Active/Passive, On demand vs Continuous need discussion
• PM for CO and CL  - have discussion in ML
• Poll
• Some have read the doc – 8
• The WG take this up – around 8
• Doc starting point – less

Next Steps/Recap

• Progressing CO and CL independently
• Will not progress on Applicability
• Reach out to other WG
• Virtual Interim  for CO and last call for CO OAM - 6