REGEXT WG meeting at IETF 96 Berlin 20th July 2016 15:50-17:20 WG chair Jim Galvin opens meeting (Co-Chair Antoin Verschuren remote) Signed-Mark has become RFC draft-ietf-eppext-keyrelay Jim Galvin - still in waiting for IPR specifics Rik Ribbers - asks Verisign to make an IPR statement accordance to BCP79 Scott Hollenbeck (via jabber) - Verisign statement is in accordance with BCP79 [editor's note: discussion is continuing on the mailing list] draft-ietf-regext-launchphase Jim Galvin - tight coupling with tmch-func-spec, has to wait for tmch-func-spec Sean Turner (via Jabber) downref is possible Jim Galvin - tmch-func-spec is needed for implementation, so no downref possible draft-ietf-regext-epp-rdap-status-mapping Ulrich Wisser agreed to be the document shepherd draft-ietf-regext-reseller / draft-ietf-regext-reseller-ext Jim Galvin - not much discussion on mailinglist Lingh - requests more reviews, outstanding issues fixed, draft updated Alex Mayrhofer - volunteers to review, Francisco Lozano - Reseller will be optional Jody Kolker - To much information is required if only name is shown in whois Jim Galvin - This needs to be discussed on list James Gould (via Meetecho) - Information will be needed for future requirements Alex Mayrhofer - Extensions is not needed in operation, registry has no connection to reseller Reduce it to absolute minimum, only name James Gould - Wants the extensions to be open to a larger requirement Antoin Verschuren (via Jabber) - Resellers may have a connection to a registry in the future, e.g., changing delegation or DNSSEC information as 3th party dns-operator. Then you’ll need more than just a name. Think of it more broadly. Go Daddy - Send name with create and be done??? Jim Galvin - take discussion to the list draft-brown-epp-fees Alex Mayrhofer - Discussion on list concludes to move the document back to a previous version Jim Galvin - we are waiting on Gavin Brown to submit a new version and restart the discussion draft-ietf-regext-bundling-registration Jiankang Yao - Presents the extension Discussion in the room with many clarifying questions Marc Blanchet - We should not have multiple bundling extensions on standard track. Merge the requirements of this one and CIRA (already on the charter) and Gould’s one (not published) and possible ICANN IDN variants work into a standard track extension. Marc committed to talk to the group of authors to start that thread. No consent on the specific bundling solutions Jim Galvin - further discussion needed draft-ietf-regext-tmch-func-spec Gustavo Lozano (via Meetecho) - Outstanding comments fixed, thinks draft is ready to be published Jody Kolker - where does 48 hour window policy come from Gustavo Lozano - timeline has been discussed Jody Kolker - get rid of timeline all together Scott Hollenbeck - IETF does not write ICANN policy, let's try to find reconciliation Jim Galvin - Ping to Patrik Fältström to provide feedback draft-lozano-regext-epp-transf-contact-inf draft-lozano-regext-rdap-transf-contact-inf Gustavo Lozano - Presents the extensions Discussion in room, draft needs more discussions on list draft-carney-regext-validate Jody Kolker - presents the extension Discussion in room and Jabber Continue on the list draft-carney-regext-domainconnect Jody Kolker - presents the extension Discussion in room and Jabber Continue on the list draft-carney-regext-unavailable-domains Jody Kolker - presents the extension Continue on the list draft-carney-regext-domain-fees Jody Kolker - presents the extension Patrick Mevzek - Please cross check with another extension done by Gavin Brown (detailed on mailinglist after the meeting to draft-brown-domain-pricing, not submitted at IETF but available on Centralnic gitlab server) Contine on the list Jim Galvin asks for reviews on these drafts Alex Mayrhofer please WG we have a lot of documents, very few reviews Meeting closed by Jim Galvin