CDNI Working Group Minutes IETF-99, Prague, Czech Republic - Chaired by Kevin Ma (remote) and Phil Sorber (on behalf of Francois Le Faucheur) - Meeting notes captured by Magnus Westerlund and Kevin J. Ma, edited by Kevin J. Ma - Audio Recording at: https://www.ietf.org/audio/ietf99/ietf99-berlin_brussels-20170717-1740.mp3 - Slides at: https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/99/materials.html Chair slides (Kevin J. Ma) -------------------------- https://www.ietf.org/proceedings/99/slides/slides-99-cdni-chair-slides-01.pdf - A large number of RFCs published (RFC7937, RFC7975, RFC8006, RFC8007, RFC8008) since last meeting (Berlin). - One milestone open, URI signing. - Three new Errata filed on Control Interface Triggers based on external review by the Streaming Video Alliance. - Beyond WG milestones: Three topics being discussed. HTTPS delegation being discussed today. URI Signing (Phil Sorber) ------------------------- https://www.ietf.org/proceedings/99/slides/slides-99-cdni-draft-ietf-cdni-uri-signing-01.pdf - 2 revs since last meeting (Berlin) - Move to JWT complete. Merge of HAS support complete. - Plan to merge 2 Pull Requests. After that ready for WGLC. Four thumbs up. - Kevin: agreeing on going forward; will start shepherd review in parallel. HTTPS delegation (Frederic Fieau) --------------------------------- https://www.ietf.org/proceedings/99/slides/slides-99-cdni-draft-fieau-cdni-interfaces-https-delegation-02.pdf - Update adding ACME * proposal, looking at CDNI Metadata for booth-strap phase. - Next step: add sub-cert, oob, and possibly lurk support and discuss triggers. - Sanjay Mishra: slide 2, typo START -> STAR. - Kevin: sent some comments on the metadata objects to the list. Question, should sub-certs be combined with ACME, or is it own object. - Emile Stephane: have a registry and different metadata sets for the different methods in the same draft for now. - Sanjay: will add sub-cert details, based on current sub-cert draft - Asking for adoption. Kevin, saying a bit premature. Want to see how next draft develops and how it relates to sub-certs and STAR progresses and their needs. Will start talking to AD about what is needed for re0charter. Any Other Business ------------------ Lijuan (Rachel) Chen, Huawei presenting Ideas on Access network CDNs https://www.ietf.org/proceedings/99/slides/slides-99-cdni-new-work-proposal-cdn-access-network-00.pdf - New Business Model for CDN SaaS (CDN Service Provider) vs [PaaS, IaaS] (Network Operator) - Sanjay: what are looking for CDNI WG to do? Rachel: Current CDNI interconnect between CDN service provider interconnect is not sufficient. Discuss how one can enlarge the marketspace/capabilities. New direction for CDNs and CDNI. - Emile: does your solution reuse existing CDNI interfaces? Rachel: Will consider existing interfaces, but first consider a business model innovation, then capabilities. - Michael Kreipl(?): are you trying to solve a business model problem with a technical solution? Rachel: Both. The story, needs to make sense. Then we can discuss solution. - Kevin: business models are not really our scope. If there are new technical requirements on CDNI then it can make sense. Please write a draft that explains how CDNI relates to the idea, and what gaps that exist. CDNI interfaces can be used for intra-CDN, but it is definitely out-of-scope of the charter and would require re-chartering. Rachel: The idea does not break/stray from CDNI, but looks for deeper integration. - Yue (Michael) Yin: we can submit a draft with use cases and problem statement. CDNI should focus on new technical questions, to see if we can expand the existing interfaces. Session Closed at 18:23