INTERNET-DRAFT                                          Mari Korkea-aho
Internet Engineering Task Force                             Haitao Tang
Document: draft-korkea-aho-spatial-dataset-00.txt                  Nokia draft-korkea-aho-spatial-dataset-01.txt            David Racz
Expires: May November 2001                                            Nokia
                                                          James M. Polk
                                                                  Cisco
                                                        Kenji Takahashi
                                                                    NTT
                                                               Nov. 2000
                                                               May 2001

                   A Common Spatial Location Dataset Data Set
              < draft-korkea-aho-spatial-dataset-01.txt >

Status of This Memo

This document is an Internet-Draft and is in full conformance with all
provisions of Section 10 of RFC 2026. Internet-Drafts are working
documents of the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF), its areas, and
its working groups.  Note that other groups may also distribute working
documents as Internet-Drafts.

Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months
and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any
time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference material
or to cite them other than as 'work in progress.'

The list of current Internet-Drafts can be accessed at
     http://www.ietf.org/ietf/1id-abstracts.txt

The list of Internet-Draft Shadow Directories can be accessed at
     http://www.ietf.org/shadow.html.

Abstract

   This work proposes a common format and extensible framework data set of expressing spatial location
   information in the Internet. The design aims at bridging various
   existing/proposed data representation formats, as well as meeting the
   requirements of existing/proposed location-aware
   applications/services.

Contents

1.   Introduction                                          2
2.   Existing Spatial Location Expressions                 2
3.   Location Information Required by Services             3
4.   Common Location Data Set                              4
 4.1	Common The Elements of the Data Set                          4
 4.2 Syntax of the Elements                                5                                6
 4.3 Encoding of the Elements                              8
  4.3.1 XML DTD for the Data Set                              7
5.	Extendible Framework                           8
  4.3.2 XML Schema for the Data Set                        8
 4.4 An XML-encoded Location Example                       10
5.   Extendibility of the Data Set                         11
6.   Security Considerations                               9                               11
7.   Acknowledgements                                      10                                      11
8.   References                                            12
9.   Author's Addresses                                    10
9.	References                                            10                                    13

1. Introduction

   Currently many organizations are working on location-related
   technologies, and how to express and provide location information to
   services and applications in the Internet. Such organizations are
   IETF, OpenGIS, 3GPP, LIF, WAP Forum, W3C, etc.

   Each of them basically specifies its own way of providing and
   expressing location information to services and applications. This
   raises a serious problem - the various location information formats,
   services, and applications will not be interoperable in the Internet.
   Therefore, a common extendible way of expressing and transferring location information for
   services and applications in the Internet is needed.

This work thus proposes

   One way of reaching interoperability is to have a common format and extensible framework of
expressing data set to
   express spatial location information with in the Internet. This draft
   proposes such a set. The design aims at bridging various
   existing/proposed data representation formats, as well as meeting the
   requirements of existing/proposed location-aware services. Security

   A more general framework enabling interoperability is one presented in
   the draft "Spatial Location Payload" <draft-korkea-aho-spatial-
   location-payload-00.txt>. The payload allows the combination of
   several location data sets. It enables e.g., the key issues common spatial
   location data set to be considered extended with application specific elements,
   or to express the
progress of the work. same location in different ways.

2. Existing Spatial Location Expressions

   There are many existing or proposed location expressions from a
   number of organizations (e.g. IETF, OpenGIS, 3GPP, LIF, WAP Forum,
   and W3C). Some of them are listed below:

   - Expression standardized for GSM and UMTS to be used internally in
     the mobile networks (called here "3GPP") [1]

   - An interface towards mobile networks in consideration by LIF [2]

   - The Geography Markup Language by the OpenGIS Consortium (GML) [3]

   - NaVigation Markup Language (NVML) [4] and Point Of Interest
     eXchange Language (POIX) [5] submitted to the W3C

   - GeoTags for HTML resource discovery [6,7]

   - National Marine Electronics Association (NMEA) interface and
     protocol [8] often used by GPS receivers

   - VCard and ICalendar [9, 10, 11] include elements to specify
     position

   - A Means for Expressing Location Information in the Domain Name System
  (DNS-LOC)
     System(DNS-LOC) [12]

   - Proposed Simple Text Format for the Spatial Location Protocol
    (SLoP) [13]

   In brief most of the formats express location with latitude,
   longitude, using WGS84 as reference datum. GML, LIF, NAVML, and POIX
   also enable expressions using other coordinate systems and reference
   datum. Some allow altitude, if the data is available. In the location
   expressions, altitude usually means the height above WGS84 reference
   ellipsoid, while it is unclear in some cases.

   Most of the formats focus on the specification of the location of a
   point object, whereas others include also the expression of object
   shapes (3GPP, LIF, and GML). In DNS-LOC and NVML radial size of
   object can be defined.

   When the accuracy for estimating a location is defined, it is mostly
   expressed as horizontal and vertical error. Though, the 3GPP proposal
   includes more complex accuracy descriptions.

   LIF, POIX, NMEA, and 3GPP include also fields for velocity/speed. It
   is expressed as horizontal speed in all the cases except 3GPP. The
   3GPP proposal defines horizontal velocity (horizontal speed +
   bearing) and vertical velocity (vertical speed + vertical direction).

   Direction of movement is also included in LIF, POIX, and NMEA, using
   true and/or magnetic North. POIX and NMEA include possibility to
   define the course as well.

3. Location Information Required by Services

   Many different types of location-aware services have been identified,
   e.g. information services (e.g. yellow pages, point-of-interest
   services), navigation & guidance, notifications (ads, traffic alerts,
   weather services, etc.), information memorizing & association,
   tracking & resource management, authorization, location specific
   resource management and discovery, location sensitive billing,
   network management.

   It appears that most of the different services will primarily need
   absolute spatial location information as input. This is also the
   format that most existing location measurement systems can provide.
   Some of the services also need descriptive location such as
   addresses, regions, etc. This kind of information is generally
   created by manual input or via transformation services.

   Altitude and accuracy information will bring added value to services,
   but most of them can live without it. It is quite evident that in
   addition to location information it is important to attach the time
   of measurement to the location. This can be essential to the
   processing and management of location information. Other information
   that could bring added value to services include the orientation of
   the object, its moving direction, intended course, and speed.

   What about the size and shape of the object? This information could
   principally be used in two ways; firstly to describe the object which
   is positioned in order to determine what region it is covering (e.g.
   in finding, guidance, notification, tracking, authorization, resource
   discovery, billing and management services), secondly to indicate the
   region of interest or object to attach information to (finding
   information and information memorizing & association). Since most of
   the objects for positioning are of minor size (<10 m), the size and
   shape of an object usually do not have significance for the location
   of the object. It is also difficult to express shapes and sizes in an
   interoperable way. In fact, size and shape can be understood and
   specified as attributes associated to a location rather than location
   itself.

4. Common Location Data Set

4.1 Common The Elements of the Data Set

   The proposal of a common data set is based on identified elements
   important to applications, and on the available data from different
   devices and interfaces.

Co-ordinates

   Coordinates and Datum (mandatory)

   When reviewing the various existing interfaces and data
   representation formats, we find that most of them support coordinates
   expressed in latitude, longitude, and altitude (optional) using WGS-84 WGS-
   84 datum. Thus we propose to use these in the common data set, where
   latitude and longitude would be mandatory. In order to keep the
   common data set simple, no other datum or coordinate systems are
   supported. We have chosen to enable the optional altitude to be
   expressed both as the WGS-
84 WGS-84 reference ellipsoid and mean sea level
   as reference.

   Location Accuracy (optional)

   Location accuracy is the estimation/measurement error of a location.
   The different interfaces include different types of accuracy
   information. We propose to include the most common way to express
   this, i.e. horizontal accuracy, by circle of radius from the
   positioned point, and height accuracy, by range from the positioned
   point.

   Time (mandatory)

   Time is the time of a measurement/fix of a location of an object. It
   is an important factor for location information. With the help of the
   time it is easier to manage location information and it enables
   different kinds of approximations. It is a mandatory element.

   Speed (optional)

   Speed is indicated as horizontal ground and vertical speed. This
   expression is chosen because many systems are able to indicate
   horizontal ground and vertical speed.

   Direction (optional)

   Direction indicates the direction of movement. It is expressed in a 2-
dimensional
   2-dimensional (horizontal) frame indicated by the magnetic (or true)
   North.

   Course (optional)

   Course indicates the direction from the current position to a defined
   destination. It is expressed in a 2-dimensional (horizontal) frame
   indicated by the magnetic (or true) North.

   Orientation (optional)

   Orientation describes the orientation of the positioned object.
   Orientation is often given with a local coordinate system as
   reference.

   Since this reference frame can be different for different objects, it
   will be difficult to make a common expression based on this. One
   possibility would be to attach an object type indicating directly the
   used reference framework. Instead of such a solution, we propose a
   method where the orientation is expressed in a 2-dimensional
   (horizontal) frame indicated by the magnetic (or true) North, and a
   vertical element expressed by the angle between horizontal plane and
   the main axis of the object.

Un-specified Attributes (optional)

An un-specified element is incorporated into the common set to include
some application specific elements. The attributes should be relevant
for location payload and not conflict with defined/existing attributes.
This field should be used with consideration.

4.2 Syntax of the Elements

   Some of the existing data formats allow different optional ways to
   express the data elements and include syntax information. However, in
   order to keep processing as simple as possible we prefer only one
   single way of expression. Here is the The syntax of the elements in the common
   data
set: set is as follows (For more details see ABNF notation in
   Appendix A and formatting details in Appendix B).

   Element            Expression format                  Example

   Coordinates

   -Latitude           [N/S]degree.minute.second,          [N|S]degree.minute.second.f,     N60.08.00.235556
    (mandatory)       degree range [0-90], decimal
                      fraction f in arbitrary length

   -Longitude          [E/W]degree.minute.second,         [E|W]degree.minute.second.f,       E25.00.00
    (mandatory)       degree range [0-180], decimal
                      fraction f in arbitrary length

   -Altitude above    [(+)|-]x.f meter from WGS-84 reference       +12
    datum             reference ellipsoid, + above,
    (optional)        - below,
 (optional) decimal fraction f
                      in arbitrary length

   -Altitude above     in meter, + above, - below,    [(+)|-]x.f meter from mean sea,    +10
    mean sea level    level, + above, - below,
    optional)         decimal fraction f in arbitrary
 (optional)
                      length

   Location Accuracy

   -Horizontal        by circle of radius from the       50.0
    accuracy          positioned point in (+)x.f meter,
    (optional)        decimal fraction f in arbitrary
                      length

   -Altitude          in (+)x.f meter, decimal fraction in           2.5
    accuracy          fraction f in arbitrary length
    (optional)

   Time [14, 15]      Real time of the measurement/fix
   (mandatory)         1999-08-15T11:16:31.0 +2:00        1999-08-15T11:16:31.0+2:00

                      YYYY-MM-DDThh:mm:ss.sTZD, where

                      YYYY = four-digit year
                      MM   = two-digit month (01=January, etc.)
                      DD   = two-digit day of month (01-31)
                      hh   = two digits of hour (00-23)
                      mm   = two digits of minute (00-59)
                      ss   = two digits of second (00-59)
                      s    = one or more digits representing a
                             decimal fraction of a second
                      TZD  = time zone designator
                            (Z or +hh:mm or -hh:mm)

   Speed

   - Ground speed      x.f [m/s | km/h | mph | knot ],     (+)x.f [ms|kmh|mph|knot],               2.0 m/s ms
     (optional)       where default meter/second or m/s, (ms),
                      decimal fraction f in arbitrary decimal fractions
                      length

   - Vertical speed    x.f [m/s | km/h | mph | knot ],   (+)x.f [ms|kmh|mph|knot],               1.0 m/s ms
     (optional)       where default meter/second (ms),
                      decimal fraction f in arbitrary decimal fractions
                      length

   Direction          magnetic/true direction,                M240
   (optional)         360 degrees from North clockwise

                    [M | T] x.f, degrees and

                      [M|T][0-360].f degrees, where
                      fractional     M240 degrees f in arbitrary
                      length, M default

   Course             magnetic/true direction,                M30
   (optional)         360 degrees from North clockwise

                    [M | T] x.f, degrees and

                      [M|T][0-360].f degrees, where
                      fractional degrees f in arbitrary
                      length, M default

   Orientation

   - Horizontal       magnetic/true direction,
     (optional)       360 degrees from North clockwise        M240

                    [M | T] x.f, degrees and

                      [M|T][0-360].f, degrees, where
                      fractional degrees f in arbitrary
                      length, M default

   - Vertical (pitch)  [+|-] [0-180].f [(+)|-][0-180].f degrees, fractional    0
    (optional)        degrees f in arbitrary length

Un-specified        attribute: value, [value]          car_orientation:
Attributes                                             360,40,20
(optional)

4.3 Encoding of the Data Set Elements

   The data elements can be encoded in many different ways, e.g., text
   based attribute-value pairs, binary, MIME, XML, etc. In order to
   enable interoperability, again, we need a common way of encoding the
   parameters. We propose XML. The advantages of XML are that the
   encoding is easily understandable, human readable, and standard tools
   and parsers can be used. In addition to this, many of the other
   proposals make use of XML. A possible disadvantage of using XML is
   that it is quite verbose.

4.3.1 XML DTD for the Data Set

   The XML.dtd XML DTD for the common expression data set is:

   <!-- slo_default.dtd -->
   <!ELEMENT SLO (POS, ALT, ALT_MSL, H_ACC, V_ACC, ALT?, ALT_MSL?, H_ACC?, V_ACC?, TIME, G_SPEED, V_SPEED,
DIR, COURSE, H_ORIENT, V_ORIENT, X_ATTR)> G_SPEED?,
   V_SPEED?, DIR?, COURSE?, H_ORIENT?, V_ORIENT?)>
   <!ELEMENT POS (LAT, LONG)>
   <!ELEMENT LAT (#PCDATA)>
   <!ELEMENT LONG (#PCDATA)>
   <!-- Altitude -->
   <!ELEMENT ALT (#PCDATA)>
   <!ELEMENT ALT_MSL (#PCDATA)>
   <!-- Location Accuracy -->
   <!ELEMENT H_ACC (#PCDATA)>
<!ATTLIST H_ACC unit (ms|kmh|mph|knot) "ms">
   <!ELEMENT V_ACC (#PCDATA)>
<!ATTLIST V_ACC unit (ms|kmh|mph|knot) "ms">
   <!-- Time -->
   <!ELEMENT TIME (#PCDATA)>
   <!-- Speed -->
   <!ELEMENT G_SPEED (#PCDATA)>
   <!ATTLIST G_SPEED unit (ms|kmh|mph|knot) "ms">
   <!ELEMENT V_SPEED (#PCDATA)>
   <!ATTLIST V_SPEED unit (ms|kmh|mph|knot) "ms">
   <!-- Direction -->
   <!ELEMENT DIR (#PCDATA)>
   <!-- Course -->
   <!ELEMENT COURSE (#PCDATA)>
   <!-- Orientation -->
   <!ELEMENT H_ORIENT (#PCDATA)>
   <!ELEMENT V_ORIENT (#PCDATA)>
<!ELEMENT X_ATTR (PARAM)>
<!ELEMENT PARAM (VALUE*)>
<!ATTLIST PARAM name CDATA #REQUIRED>
<!ELEMENT VALUE (#PCDATA)>

An XML-encoded location example:

<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE IETF_SLO_Default PUBLIC "-//IETF//SLO default//EN"
"slo_default.dtd">
<SLO>
 <POS>
  <LAT>N60.08.00.235556</LAT>
  <LONG> E025.00.00</LONG>
 </POS>
 <ALT>+12</ALT>
 <ALT_MSL>+10</ALT_MSL>
 <H_ACC>50.0</H_ACC>
 <V_ACC>2.5</V_ACC>
 <TIME>1999-08-15T11:16:31.0 +2:00</TIME>
 <G_SPEED unit=ms>2.0</G_SPEED>
 <V_SPEED unit=ms>1.0</V_SPEED>
 <DIR>M240</DIR>
 <COURSE>M30</COURSE>
 <H_ORIENT>M240</H_ORIENT>
 <V_ORIENT>0</V_ORIENT>
 <X_ATTR>
  <PARAM name="car_orientation">
   <VALUE>360</VALUE>
   <VALUE>40</VALUE>
   <VALUE>20</VALUE>
  </PARAM>
 </X_ATTR>
</SLO>

5. Extendible Framework

A framework enables to express

4.3.2 XML Schema for the same location in different ways, or
add extensions to Data Set

   XML Schemas provide a certain expression. That is, the location expression
can be gathered by combining different location information modules. We
propose an XML-based framework.

Since we assume that the XML-parser performs validation, the framework
needs to include the references to means for defining the dtds structure, content and
   semantics of XML documents more precisely than the data subsets DTDs. With help of
   the
framework. We assume that the receiving party has the required dtds,
otherwise a URL pointing to XML Schema we can express the dtd should be available. One way of
creating constraints on the framework different data
   elements better. Below is to create a LOC_FRAME document that
incorporates the dtds of XML-Schema for the different common spatial
   location representation modules.
Below data set.

   <?xml version="1.0"?>
   <xsd:schema targetNamespace="http://www-nrc.nokia.com/ietf-
   spatial/2001/05/08/location" xmlns:this="http:// www-
   nrc.nokia.com/ietf-spatial/2001/05/08/location"
   xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema">
     <xsd:element name="SLO" type="this:LocationData"/>
     <xsd:complexType name="LocationData">
       <xsd:sequence>
         <xsd:element name="POS" type="this:POSType"/>
         <xsd:element name="ALT" type="xsd:decimal" minOccurs="0"/>
         <xsd:element name="ALT_MSL" type="xsd:decimal" minOccurs="0"/>
         <xsd:element name="H_ACC" type="this:NonNegativeDecimal"
   minOccurs="0"/>
         <xsd:element name="V_ACC" type="this:NonNegativeDecimal"
   minOccurs="0"/>
         <xsd:element name="TIME" type="xsd:dateTime"/>
         <xsd:element name="G_SPEED" type="this:Speed" minOccurs="0"/>
         <xsd:element name="V_SPEED" type="this:Speed" minOccurs="0"/>
         <xsd:element name="DIR" type="this:DegreesFromNorth"
   minOccurs="0"/>
         <xsd:element name="COURSE" type="this:DegreesFromNorth"
   minOccurs="0"/>
         <xsd:element name="H_ORIENT" type="this:DegreesFromNorth"
   minOccurs="0"/>
         <xsd:element name="V_ORIENT" type="this:PlusMinus180Decimal"
   minOccurs="0"/>
   </xsd:sequence>
     </xsd:complexType>
     <xsd:complexType name="POSType">
       <xsd:sequence>
         <xsd:element name="LAT" type="this:LATType"/>
         <xsd:element name="LONG" type="this:LONGType"/>
       </xsd:sequence>
     </xsd:complexType>
     <xsd:simpleType name="LATType">
       <xsd:restriction base="xsd:string">
         <xsd:pattern value="(N|S)((\d|[0-8]\d)\.([0-5]\d)\.[0-
   5]\d(\.\d+)?)|90\.00\.00(\.0+)?"/>
       </xsd:restriction>
     </xsd:simpleType>
     <xsd:simpleType name="LONGType">
       <xsd:restriction base="xsd:string">
         <xsd:pattern value="(E|W)((\d|\d\d|[0-1][0-7]\d)\.([0-
   5]\d)\.[0-5]\d(\.\d+)?)|180\.00\.00(\.0+)?"/>
       </xsd:restriction>
     </xsd:simpleType>
     <xsd:simpleType name="DegreesFromNorth">
        <xsd:restriction base="xsd:string">
         <xsd:pattern value="(M?|T)((\d|\d\d|[0-3][0-
   5]\d)(\.\d+)?)|(360(\.0+)?)"/>
       </xsd:restriction>

     </xsd:simpleType>
     <xsd:simpleType name="PlusMinus180Decimal">
       <xsd:restriction base="xsd:decimal">
         <xsd:minInclusive value="-180"/>
         <xsd:maxInclusive value="180"/>
       </xsd:restriction>
     </xsd:simpleType>
     <xsd:simpleType name="NonNegativeDecimal">
       <xsd:restriction base="xsd:decimal">
         <xsd:minInclusive value="0"/>
       </xsd:restriction>
     </xsd:simpleType>
     <xsd:simpleType name="SpeedUnit">
       <xsd:restriction base="xsd:string">
         <xsd:enumeration value="ms"/>
         <xsd:enumeration value="kmh"/>
         <xsd:enumeration value="mph"/>
         <xsd:enumeration value="knot"/>
       </xsd:restriction>
     </xsd:simpleType>
     <xsd:complexType name="Speed">
       <xsd:simpleContent>
         <xsd:extension base="this:NonNegativeDecimal">
           <xsd:attribute name="unit" type="this:SpeedUnit"
   default="ms"/>
         </xsd:extension>
       </xsd:simpleContent>
     </xsd:complexType>
   </xsd:schema>

4.4 An XML-encoded Location Example

   Here is an example, where the framework incorporates two subsets, example of a location described using the
"slo_default" subset common location
   data set and "my_loc" subset: its XML Schema:

   <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE LOC_FRAME [
<!ENTITY % slo_default_dtd public PUBLIC "-//IETF//SLO_default//EN"
"slo_default.dtd">
<!ENTITY % my_loc_dtd public PUBLIC "-//MY_LOC//My_Location//EN"
"my_loc.dtd">
%slo_default_dtd;
%my_loc_dtd;
<!ELEMENT LOC_FRAME (SLO, MY_LOC)>
]>
<LOC_FRAME>
<SLO>
...
</SLO>
<MY_LOC>
...
</MY_LOC>
</LOC_FRAME>

If each module is identified by an identifier (e.g. version = "1.0" encoding = "UTF-8"?>
   <loc:SLO xmlns:loc="http://www-nrc.nokia.com/ietf-
   spatial/2001/05/08/location"
   xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"
   xsi:schemaLocation="http://www-nrc.nokia.com/ietf-
   spatial/2001/05/08/location http://www-nrc.nokia.com/ietf-
   spatial/2001/05/08/location.xsd">
     <POS>
       <LAT>N60.08.00.235556</LAT>
       <LONG>E025.00.00</LONG>
     </POS>
     <ALT>+12.99</ALT>
     <ALT_MSL>010</ALT_MSL>
     <H_ACC>50</H_ACC>
     <V_ACC>2.5</V_ACC>
     <TIME>2001-01-01T12:00:01+02:00</TIME>
     <G_SPEED>2.0</G_SPEED>
     <V_SPEED unit="knot">1</V_SPEED>
     <DIR>M240</DIR>
     <COURSE>M30</COURSE>
     <H_ORIENT>T25</H_ORIENT>
     <V_ORIENT>179</V_ORIENT>
   </loc:SLO>

5. Extendibility of the system or public
identifier Data Set

   The common spatial location data set includes only a specific set of
   elements with clearly defined contents (The element "un-specified
   attributes" existing in the document, or previous version was removed from the XML-root element), it will be easier
to identify
   data set). In this manner we can keep the data set unambiguous and to process
   unique. This simplifies transformation and transform validation of the data. In data
   set.

   XML Schema [16] provides general extension mechanisms with which SLO
   or elements of it can be incorporated in other data sets.

   However, in order to avoid conflicts in the structure document, simplify transformation and processing of the
   different data sets sets, we recommend that application specific
   extensions should include unique XML-elements. This could be achieved by using XML-
namespaces [16].

Another option to be further studied is to include the different dtds in
an external dtd (e.g. SLO_MY_LOC.dtd) defined as own data sets and then reference the dtd in attached to the
   common location representation document, in a similar manner data set as proposed described in the
XHTML modularization draft "Spatial Location
   Payload" [17]. If used  in combination with namespaces  this
approach  would  allow  interleaving  of  elements  from  the  different
location representation data sets.

6. Security Considerations

   Location information alone usually means nothing but a "point" somewhere.
   However, when associated with a meaningful target such as a person,
   the location is potentially private or sensitive even though some
   parties (such as shops) may like to release their location information to the public.

   The authors believe that location information should there must be
delivered based on the policy set to the location information. In
addition, certain security and policy mechanisms should be used
   available to protect the
location information, if required (as most information whenever needed. These issues
   are, however, out of the cases). This should be
looked into more detail when defining the complete payload for
transferring scope of the definition of a common location data.
   data set. We let the location-dealing applications or protocols
   define or select their own specific security mechanisms for
   authorization, authentication, encryption, key exchange, etc.

7. Acknowledgements

   The authors would like to thank all those who have provided comments
   to this document.

8. Author's Addresses

Mari Korkea-aho
Nokia Research Center
P.O. Box 407
FIN-00045 Nokia Group
Finland
Email: mari.korkea-aho@nokia.com

Haitao Tang
Nokia Research Center
P.O. BOX 407
FIN-00045 Nokia Group
Finland
Email: haitao.tang@nokia.com

James Polk
Cisco Systems
18581 N. Dallas Parkway
Dallas, Texas 75287
Phone: +1 972.813.5208
Email: jmpolk@cisco.com

Kenji Takahashi
Information Sharing Platform Laboratories
NTT
3-9-11 Midoricho
Musashino, Tokyo 180-8585 Japan
Phone: +81 422 59 6668
Email: kt@nttlabs.com

9. References

   [1]     3rd Generation Partnership Project, Technical Specification
           Group Core Network, Universal Geographical Area Description
           (GAD), Release 1999, Technical Specification, 3G TS 23.032
           V3.1.0 (2000-03)

   [2]     Definition of a Mobile Location Query API, Contribution to
           Location Inter-operability Forum (LIF), API Specification, v.
            0.5, 18 Oct 2000

   [3]     Lake, R., Cuthbert, A. (eds.), Geography Markup Language
           (GML) v1.0, OGC Document Number: 00-029, 12-May-2000,
           http://www.opengis.org/techno/specs/00-029.pdf

   [4]     Sekiguchi, et al., NaVigation Markup Language (NVML), W3C
           Note 6 Aug 1999,http://www.w3.org/TR/NVML

   [5]     Hiroyuki Kanemitsu, Tomihisa Kamada, POIX: Point Of Interest
           eXchange Language Specification,  W3C Note - 24 June 1999,
           http://www.w3.org/TR/poix

   [6]     Daviel, A., Geographic registration of HTML documents, <draft-
        daviel-html-geo-tag-03.txt>,
           <draft-daviel-html-geo-tag-03.txt>, April 2000,
           http://geotags.com/geo/draft-daviel-html-geo-tag-03.txt

   [7]     Daviel, A., Geographic extensions  for HTTP transactions,
           <draft-daviel-http-geo-header-02.txt>, April 2000,
           http://geotags.com/geo/draft-daviel-http-geo-header-02.txt

   [8]     Bennett P., The NMEA FAQ, version 6.3,  April 25, 2000,
           http://vancouver-webpages.com/pub/peter/nmeafaq.txt

   [9]     Internet Mail Consortium, "vCard - The Electronic Business
           Card Version 2.1", September 18, 1996,
           http://www.imc.org/pdi/vcard-21.txt

   [10]    Dawson, F., Howes, T. , vCard MIME Directory Profile, IETF
           RFC 2426, September 1998, http://www.imc.org/rfc2426

   [11]    Dawson, F., Stenerson, D., Internet Calendaring and
           Scheduling Core Object Specification (iCalendar), RFC 2445,
           November 1998, http://www.imc.org/rfc2445

   [12]    Davis, C., Vixie, P., Goodwin, T., Dickinson, I., A Means for
           Expressing Location Information in the Domain Name System,
           IETF RFC 1876, January 1996,
           ftp://ftp.funet.fi/pub/doc/rfc/rfc1876.txt

   [13]    Mahy, R., A Simple Text Format for the Spatial Location
           Protocol (SLoP), Internet draft, July 2000, Work in progress,
           http://search.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-mahy-spatial-
           simple-coord-00.txt

   [14]    Wolf, M., Wicksteed, C., W3C note, Date and Time Formats, 15
           September 1997, http://www.w3.org/TR/1998/NOTE-datetime-
           19980827

   [15]    Kuhn, M., A Summary of the International Standard Date and
           Time Notation, http://www.cl.cam.ac.uk/~mgk25/iso-time.html

   [16]    Bray et al., Namespaces in XML, World Wide Web Consortium 14
        January 1999, http://www.w3.org/TR/1999/REC-xml-names-19990114    Fallside, D. (Ed.), XML Schema Part 0: Primer, W3C
           Recommendation, May 2001, http://www.w3.org/TR/xmlschema-0/

   [17]    Adams, et al., Modularization    Korkea-aho, M., Tang, H., Spatial Location Payload, <draft
           -korkea-aho-spatial-location-payload-00.txt>, Internet draft,
           May 2001, Work in progress

9. Author's Addresses

   Mari Korkea-aho
   Nokia Research Center
   P.O. Box 407
   FIN-00045 Nokia Group
   Finland
   Email: mari.korkea-aho@iki.fi

   Haitao Tang
   Nokia Research Center
   P.O. BOX 407
   FIN-00045 Nokia Group
   Finland
   Email: haitao.tang@nokia.com

   David L Racz
   Nokia Research Center
   5 Wayside Road
   Burlington, MA 01803
   USA
   Email: david.racz@nokia.com

   James Polk
   Cisco Systems
   18581 N. Dallas Parkway
   Dallas, Texas 75287
   USA
   Phone: +1 972.813.5208
   Email: jmpolk@cisco.com

   Kenji Takahashi
   Information Sharing Platform Laboratories
   NTT
   3-9-11 Midoricho
   Musashino, Tokyo 180-8585 Japan
   Phone: +81 422 59 6668
   Email: kt@nttlabs.com

Appendix A Formal Syntax of XHTML, 20 October 2000,
        http://www.w3.org/TR/2000/CR-xhtml-modularization-20001020/
	xhtml-modularization-20001020.html the Common Data Set

   The syntax is specified with ABNF grammar (IETF RFC2234).

   -----------------------------------------------------------------

   SLO = Coordinate Delimiter
         [Location_Accuracy Delimiter]
         Time Delimiter
         [Speed Delimiter]
         [Direction Delimiter]
         [Course Delimiter]
         [Orientation Delimiter]

   Delimiter = <any delimiter string>
               ; Delimiter depending on the coding

   Coordinate = Latitude Delimiter Longitude [Delimiter
                (Altitude_WGS84 | Altitude_Sea)]

   Latitude = ( "N" | "S" ) Degree90 "." Minute "." Second "." Fraction

   Degree90 = <an integer in [0, 90], leading zero allowed>

   Minute = "00" - "60"

   Second = "00" - "60"

   Fraction = *Digit

   Digit = "0" - "9"

   Longitude = ( "E" | "W" ) Degree180 "." Minute "." Second "."
               Fraction

   Degree180 = <an integer in [0, 180], leading zeros allowed>

   Altitude_WGS84 = ( [ "+" ] | "-" ) Meter "." Fraction
          ; height in meter from WGS-84 reference ellipsoid

   Meter = *Digit

   Fraction = *Digit
   Altitude_Sea = ( [ "+" ] | "-" ) Meter "." Fraction
    ; height in meter from mean sea level

   Location_Accuracy = [ Horizontal_Accuracy Delimiter] [
                Height_Accuracy ]

   Horizontal_Accuracy = [ "+" ] Meter "." Fraction

   Height_Accuracy = [ "+" ] Meter "." Fraction

   Time = YYYY "-" MM "-" DD "T" hh ":" mm ":" ss "." s TZD

   YYYY = 4*4Digit

   MM = "01" - "12"

   DD = "01" - "31"

   hh = "00" - "23"

   mm = "00" - "59"

   ss = "00" - "59"

   s = *Digit

   TZD = "Z" | (( "+" | "-" ) hh:mm ) ; where Z means zero meridian

   Speed = [ Ground_speed [Delimiter Speed unit] Delimiter]
     [ Vertical_speed [Delimiter Speed unit]]

   Ground_speed = [ "+" ] *Digit "." *Digit

   Speed unit = ("ms" | "kmh" | "mph" | "knot") ; default: ms

   Vertical_speed = [ "+" ] *Digit "." *Digit

   Direction = Magnetic_direction | True_direction

   Magnetic_direction = [ "M" ] Degree360 "." Fraction

   Degree360 = <an integer in [0, 360], leading zeros allowed>

   True_direction = "T" Degree360 "." Fraction

   Course = Magnetic_direction | True_direction

   Orientation = Horizontal_orientation | Vertical_orientation

   Horizontal_orientation = Magnetic_direction | True_direction
   Vertical_orientation = ( [ "+" ] | "-" ) Degree180 "." Fraction

   -----------------------------------------------------------------

Appendix B Formatting Details for Common Spatial Data Set

   The table below shows the allowed prefixes for the different elements
   in the common spatial data set. The table shows also for which
   elements leading zeros are required.

   ------------------+--------------------+----------------
                     | Allowed prefixes   |   Leading Zero
   ------------------+--------------------+----------------
   LAT      degree   |       N|S          |     optional
   LONG     degree   |       E|W          |     optional
   LAT/LONG minute   |                    |     required
   LAT/LONG second   |                    |     required
   ALT               |      [+]|-         |     optional
   ALT_MSL           |      [+]|-         |     optional
   H_ACC             |      [+]           |     optional
   V_ACC             |      [+]           |     optional
   G_SPEED           |      [+]           |     optional
   V_SPEED           |      [+]           |     optional
   DIR               | M (default)|T      |     optional
   COURSE            | M (default)|T      |     optional
   H_ORIENT          | M (default)|T      |     optional
   V_ORIENT          |       [+]|-        |     optional
   ------------------+--------------------+----------------

   -----------------------------------------------------------------

   Copyright Statement

   Copyright (C) The Internet Society (2000).  All Rights Reserved.

   This document and translations of it may be copied and furnished to
   others, and derivative works that comment on or otherwise explain it
   or assist in its implementation may be prepared, copied, published
   and distributed, in whole or in part, without restriction of any
   kind, provided that the above copyright notice and this paragraph are
   included on all such copies and derivative works. However, this
   document itself may not be modified in any way, such as by removing
   the copyright notice or references to the Internet Society or other
   Internet organizations, except as needed for the purpose of
   developing Internet standards in which case the procedures for
   copyrights defined in the Internet Standards process must be
   followed, or as required to translate it into languages other than
   English. The limited permissions granted above are perpetual and will
   not be revoked by the Internet Society or its successors or assigns.
   This document and the information contained herein is provided on an
   "AS IS" basis and THE INTERNET SOCIETY AND THE INTERNET ENGINEERING
   TASK FORCE DISCLAIMS ALL WARRANTIES, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING
   BUT NOT LIMITED TO ANY WARRANTY THAT THE USE OF THE INFORMATION
   HEREIN WILL NOT INFRINGE ANY RIGHTS OR ANY IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF
   MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE."