Network Working Group                                        M. Mealling
Internet-Draft                                   Network Solutions, Inc.
Expires: July 12, 2001                                  January 11, 2001
ObsoletesA new Request for Comments is now available in online RFC 3001 libraries.

        RFC 3061

        Title:      A URN Namespace of Object Identifiers
                    draft-mealling-rfc3001bis-00.txt

Status of this Memo

   This document is an Internet-Draft and is in full conformance with
   all provisions of Section 10 of RFC2026.

   Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering
   Task Force (IETF), its areas, and its working groups. Note that
   other groups may also distribute working documents as
   Internet-Drafts.

   Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six
   months and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents
   at any time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference
   material or to cite them other than as "work in progress."

   To view the entire list of Internet-Draft Shadow Directories, see
   http://www.ietf.org/shadow.html.

   This Internet-Draft will expire on July 12, 2001.

Copyright Notice

   Copyright (C) The Internet Society (2001). All Rights Reserved.

Abstract
        Author(s):  M. Mealling
        Status:     Informational
        Date:       February 2001
        Mailbox:    michaelm@netsol.com
        Pages:      6
        Characters: 8387
        Obsoletes:  3001

        I-D Tag:    draft-mealling-rfc3001bis-01.txt

        URL:        ftp://ftp.rfc-editor.org/in-notes/rfc3061.txt

This document describes a URN Uniform Resource Name (URN) namespace that
contains Object Identifiers (OIDs).  It obsoletes RFC 3001.

1. Introduction

   An Object Identifier is a tree of nodes where each node is simply a
   sequence of digits. The rules roughly state that once an entity is
   assigned a node in the  Object Identifier (OID) tree, it has sole
   discretion to further sub-delegate sub-trees off of that node. Some
   examples of OIDs include:

   o  1.3.6.1 - the Internet OID
   o  1.3.6.1.4.1 - IANA-assigned company OIDs, used for private MIBs
      and such things
   o  1.3.6.1.2.1.27 - The Applications MIB
   o  0.9.2342.19200300.100.4 - Object ID's used in the directory pilot
      project to identify X.500 Object Classes. Mostly defined in
      RFC-1274.

This document specifies the "oid" URN namespace[2]. This namespace
   is memo provides information for encoding the Internet community.  It does
not specify an Object Identifier as specified in ASN.1[3] as a
   URI. RFC 3001[1] is obsoleted by this specification.

   The namespace specification is for a formal namespace.

2. Specification Template

   Namespace ID:

      "oid" requested.

   Registration Information:

       Registration Version Number: 1
       Registration Date: 2000-04-30

   Declared registrant Internet standard of the namespace:

       The ISO/IEC Joint Technical Committee 1 - SubCommittee 6

         The real authority any kind.  Distribution of this
memo is the ASN.1 specification itself but SC6 unlimited.

This announcement is the committee that has the authority sent to interpret what that
         means, thus that committee is listed as the registrant.

   Declaration of structure:

      The NSS portion of the identifier follows the string encoding
      rules found in RFC 1778 Section 2.15[4]which specifies a series
      of digits separated by a period with the most significant digit
      being at the left IETF list and the least significant being at the right.
      At no time shall the NSS portion of the URN contain the human
      readable 'names' of a particular node in the OID tree. The NSS
      portion of the name is strictly limited RFC-DIST list.
Requests to the digits 0-9 and the
      '.' character. No other characters are permitted.

      No changes are anticipated since Object Identifiers are fairly
      simple and have been standardized with no changes for many years.

   Relevant ancillary documentation:

      Relevant documentation can be found in X.660/Amd 2 | ISO/IEC
      9834-1/Amd 2[3].

   Identifier uniqueness considerations:

      The rules for assignment of OIDs requires that each OID be unique added to the OID space and that it cannot be reassigned or reused. By
      reference this URN namespace inherits those rules.

   Identifier persistence considerations:

      The rules concerning deleted from the use of OIDs requires that they not IETF distribution list
should be
      reused once assigned. By reference this URN namespace inherits
      those rules.

   Process of identifier assignment:

      Once an OID is assigned sent to some entity, that entity can then
      create and assign new OIDs below that particular OID. There are
      multiple entities that assign new OIDs IETF-REQUEST@IETF.ORG.  Requests to the general public. The
      top three levels are pre-assigned as follows:
         0 - ITU-T assigned
         1 - ISO assigned
         2 - Joint ISO/ITU-T assignment

      several assigned OIDs that are of importance be
added to the Internet are:
         1.3.6.1 - the Internet OID
         1.3.6.1.4.1 - IANA-assigned company OIDs, used for private
         MIBs and such things

   Process of identifier resolution:

      At this time no resolution mechanism is defined.

   Rules for Lexical Equivalence:

      OIDs are composed of multiple occurrences of digits and the "."
      character. Lexical equivalence is achieved by exact string match.

   Conformance with URN Syntax:

      There are no additional characters reserved.

   Validation mechanism:

      None.

   Scope:

      Global

3. Examples

   The following examples are taken from the example OIDs or deleted from the
   Introduction:
      urn:oid:1.3.6.1
      urn:oid:1.3.6.1.4.1
      urn:oid:1.3.6.1.2.1.27
      URN:OID:0.9.2342.19200300.100.4

4. Security Considerations

   None not already inherent to using unverifiable OIDs

5. Acknowledgments

   The author would like to thank Harald Alvestrand for the use of his
   OID database as a source for examples and references.

References

   [1]  Mealling, M., "A URN Namespace of Object Identifiers", RFC
        3001, November 2000.

   [2]  Moats, R., "URN Syntax", RFC 2141, May 1997.

   [3]  CCITT, "Specification of Basic Encoding Rules for Abstract
        Syntax Notation One (ASN.1)", CCITT Recommendation X.209,
        January 1988.

   [4]  Howes, T., Kille, S., Yeong, W. and C. Robbins, "The String
        Representation of Standard Attribute Syntaxes", RFC 1778, March
        1995.

Author's Address

   Michael Mealling
   Network Solutions, Inc.
   505 Huntmar Park Drive
   Herndon, VA  22070
   US

   Phone: +1 770 935 5492
   EMail: michaelm@netsol.com
   URI:   http://www.netsol.com

Full Copyright Statement

   Copyright (C) The Internet Society (2001). All Rights Reserved.

   This document and translations of it may RFC-DIST distribution list should
be copied and furnished sent to
   others, and derivative works that comment RFC-DIST-REQUEST@RFC-EDITOR.ORG.

Details on obtaining RFCs via FTP or otherwise explain it
   or assist in its implementation may be prepared, copied, published
   and distributed, in whole or in part, without restriction of any
   kind, provided that the above copyright notice and this paragraph
   are included on all such copies and derivative works. However, this
   document itself EMAIL may not be modified in any way, such as obtained by removing
   the copyright notice or references sending
an EMAIL message to rfc-info@RFC-EDITOR.ORG with the Internet Society or other
   Internet organizations, except as needed for message body
help: ways_to_get_rfcs.  For example:

        To: rfc-info@RFC-EDITOR.ORG
        Subject: getting rfcs

        help: ways_to_get_rfcs

Requests for special distribution should be addressed to either the purpose
author of
   developing Internet standards in which case the procedures for
   copyrights defined RFC in the Internet Standards process must be
   followed, question, or as required to translate it into languages other than
   English.

   The limited permissions granted above are perpetual and will not be
   revoked by the Internet Society or its successors or assigns.

   This document and the information contained herein is provided RFC-Manager@RFC-EDITOR.ORG.  Unless
specifically noted otherwise on an
   "AS IS" basis and THE INTERNET SOCIETY AND THE INTERNET ENGINEERING
   TASK FORCE DISCLAIMS ALL WARRANTIES, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING
   BUT NOT LIMITED TO ANY WARRANTY THAT THE USE OF THE INFORMATION
   HEREIN WILL NOT INFRINGE ANY RIGHTS OR ANY IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF
   MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.

Acknowledgment

   Funding for the RFC editor function is currently provided by the
   Internet Society. itself, all RFCs are for
unlimited distribution.echo
Submissions for Requests for Comments should be sent to
RFC-EDITOR@RFC-EDITOR.ORG.  Please consult RFC 2223, Instructions to RFC
Authors, for further information.