| < draft-boutros-l2vpn-evpn-vpws-04.txt | draft-boutros-l2vpn-evpn-vpws-05.txt > | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| skipping to change at page 1, line 20 ¶ | skipping to change at page 1, line 20 ¶ | |||
| Jeff Tantsura | Jeff Tantsura | |||
| Ericsson | Ericsson | |||
| Dirk Steinberg | Dirk Steinberg | |||
| Steinberg Consulting | Steinberg Consulting | |||
| Thomas Beckhaus | Thomas Beckhaus | |||
| Deutsche Telecom | Deutsche Telecom | |||
| Expires: January 3, 2015 July 2, 2014 | Expires: April 24, 2015 October 21, 2014 | |||
| VPWS support in E-VPN | VPWS support in E-VPN | |||
| draft-boutros-l2vpn-evpn-vpws-04.txt | draft-boutros-l2vpn-evpn-vpws-05.txt | |||
| Abstract | Abstract | |||
| This document describes how E-VPN can be used to support virtual | This document describes how E-VPN can be used to support virtual | |||
| private wire service (VPWS) in MPLS/IP networks. E-VPN enables the | private wire service (VPWS) in MPLS/IP networks. E-VPN enables the | |||
| following characteristics for VPWS: single-active as well as all- | following characteristics for VPWS: single-active as well as all- | |||
| active multi-homing with flow-based load-balancing, eliminates the | active multi-homing with flow-based load-balancing, eliminates the | |||
| need for single-segment and multi-segment PW signaling, and provides | need for single-segment and multi-segment PW signaling, and provides | |||
| fast protection using data-plane prefix independent convergence upon | fast protection using data-plane prefix independent convergence upon | |||
| node or link failure. | node or link failure. | |||
| skipping to change at page 2, line 36 ¶ | skipping to change at page 2, line 36 ¶ | |||
| Table of Contents | Table of Contents | |||
| 1 Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 | 1 Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 | |||
| 1.1 Terminology . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 | 1.1 Terminology . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 | |||
| 1.2 Requirements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 | 1.2 Requirements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 | |||
| 2. BGP Extensions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 | 2. BGP Extensions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 | |||
| 3 Operation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 | 3 Operation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 | |||
| 4 EVPN Comparison to PW Signaling . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7 | 4 EVPN Comparison to PW Signaling . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7 | |||
| 5 ESI Bandwidth . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7 | 5 ESI Bandwidth . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7 | |||
| 6 Failure Scenarios . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8 | ||||
| 6.1 Single-Homed CEs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8 | ||||
| 6.1 Multi-Homed CEs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8 | ||||
| 7 VPWS with multiple sites . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8 | 7 VPWS with multiple sites . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8 | |||
| 8 Acknowledgements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8 | 8 Acknowledgements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8 | |||
| 9 Security Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8 | 9 Security Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8 | |||
| 10 IANA Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8 | 10 IANA Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8 | |||
| 11 References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8 | 11 References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8 | |||
| 11.1 Normative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8 | 11.1 Normative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9 | |||
| 11.2 Informative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8 | 11.2 Informative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9 | |||
| Authors' Addresses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8 | Authors' Addresses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9 | |||
| 1 Introduction | 1 Introduction | |||
| This document describes how EVPN can be used to support virtual | This document describes how EVPN can be used to support virtual | |||
| private wire service (VPWS) in MPLS/IP networks. The use of EVPN | private wire service (VPWS) in MPLS/IP networks. The use of EVPN | |||
| mechanisms for VPWS brings the benefits of EVPN to p2p services. | mechanisms for VPWS brings the benefits of EVPN to p2p services. | |||
| These benefits include single-active redundancy as well as all-active | These benefits include single-active redundancy as well as all-active | |||
| redundancy with flow-based load-balancing. Furthermore, the use of | redundancy with flow-based load-balancing. Furthermore, the use of | |||
| EVPN for VPWS eliminates the need for signaling single-segment and | EVPN for VPWS eliminates the need for signaling single-segment and | |||
| multi-segment PWs for p2p Ethernet services. | multi-segment PWs for p2p Ethernet services. | |||
| skipping to change at page 8, line 9 ¶ | skipping to change at page 8, line 9 ¶ | |||
| for the Bandwidth requested by this EVPL service. | for the Bandwidth requested by this EVPL service. | |||
| In the case where PSN resources are not available, the PE receiving | In the case where PSN resources are not available, the PE receiving | |||
| this attribute MUST re-send its local Ethernet AD routes for this | this attribute MUST re-send its local Ethernet AD routes for this | |||
| EVPL service with the ESI Bandwidth = All FFs to declare that the | EVPL service with the ESI Bandwidth = All FFs to declare that the | |||
| "PSN Resources Unavailable". | "PSN Resources Unavailable". | |||
| The scope of the ESI Bandwidth is limited to only one Autonomous | The scope of the ESI Bandwidth is limited to only one Autonomous | |||
| System. | System. | |||
| 6 Failure Scenarios | ||||
| On a link or port failure between the CE and the PE for both single | ||||
| and multi-homed CEs, the PE must withdraw all the associated Ethernet | ||||
| AD routes for the VPWS service instances on the failed port or link. | ||||
| 6.1 Single-Homed CEs | ||||
| Unlike [EVPN], EVPN-VPWS uses Ethernet AD route advertisements for | ||||
| single-homed Ethernet Segments. Therefore, upon a link/port failure | ||||
| of this single-homed Ethernet Segment, the PE MUST withdraw the | ||||
| associated Ethernet A-D routes. | ||||
| 6.1 Multi-Homed CEs | ||||
| For a faster convergence in multi-homed scenarios with either Single- | ||||
| Active Redundancy or All-active redundancy, mass withdraw technique | ||||
| as per [EVPN] baseline is used. A PE previously advertising an | ||||
| Ethernet A-D per ES route, can withdraw this route signaling to the | ||||
| remote PEs to switch all the VPWS service instances associated with | ||||
| this multi-homed ES to the backup PE | ||||
| 7 VPWS with multiple sites | 7 VPWS with multiple sites | |||
| The VPWS among multiple sites (full mesh of P2P connections - one per | The VPWS among multiple sites (full mesh of P2P connections - one per | |||
| pair of sites) that can be setup automatically without any explicit | pair of sites) that can be setup automatically without any explicit | |||
| provisioning of P2P connections among the sites is outside the scope | provisioning of P2P connections among the sites is outside the scope | |||
| of this document. | of this document. | |||
| 8 Acknowledgements | 8 Acknowledgements | |||
| The authors would like to acknowledge Wen Lin contributions to this | The authors would like to acknowledge Wen Lin contributions to this | |||
| End of changes. 5 change blocks. | ||||
| 5 lines changed or deleted | 30 lines changed or added | |||
This html diff was produced by rfcdiff 1.48. The latest version is available from http://tools.ietf.org/tools/rfcdiff/ | ||||