< draft-chen-ospf-tts-02.txt   draft-chen-ospf-tts-03.txt >
Internet Engineering Task Force H. Chen Internet Engineering Task Force H. Chen
Internet-Draft Huawei Technologies Internet-Draft Futurewei
Intended status: Standards Track M. Toy Intended status: Standards Track M. Toy
Expires: January 21, 2018 Verizon Expires: April 4, 2020 Verizon
V. Liu V. Liu
China Mobile China Mobile
L. Liu L. Liu
Fijitsu Fijitsu
July 20, 2017 October 2, 2019
Extensions to OSPF for Temporal LSP Extensions to OSPF for Temporal LSP
draft-chen-ospf-tts-02.txt draft-chen-ospf-tts-03.txt
Abstract Abstract
This document specifies extensions to OSPF for distributing Traffic This document specifies extensions to OSPF for distributing Traffic
Engineering (TE) information on a link in a sequence of time Engineering (TE) information on a link in a sequence of time
intervals. intervals.
Status of this Memo Status of this Memo
This Internet-Draft is submitted in full conformance with the This Internet-Draft is submitted in full conformance with the
skipping to change at page 1, line 37 skipping to change at page 1, line 37
Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering
Task Force (IETF). Note that other groups may also distribute Task Force (IETF). Note that other groups may also distribute
working documents as Internet-Drafts. The list of current Internet- working documents as Internet-Drafts. The list of current Internet-
Drafts is at http://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/current/. Drafts is at http://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/current/.
Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months
and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any
time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference
material or to cite them other than as "work in progress." material or to cite them other than as "work in progress."
This Internet-Draft will expire on January 21, 2018. This Internet-Draft will expire on April 4, 2020.
Copyright Notice Copyright Notice
Copyright (c) 2017 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the Copyright (c) 2019 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the
document authors. All rights reserved. document authors. All rights reserved.
This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal
Provisions Relating to IETF Documents Provisions Relating to IETF Documents
(http://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of (http://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of
publication of this document. Please review these documents publication of this document. Please review these documents
carefully, as they describe your rights and restrictions with respect carefully, as they describe your rights and restrictions with respect
to this document. Code Components extracted from this document must to this document. Code Components extracted from this document must
include Simplified BSD License text as described in Section 4.e of include Simplified BSD License text as described in Section 4.e of
the Trust Legal Provisions and are provided without warranty as the Trust Legal Provisions and are provided without warranty as
skipping to change at page 10, line 30 skipping to change at page 10, line 30
The author would like to thank people for their valuable comments on The author would like to thank people for their valuable comments on
this draft. this draft.
9. References 9. References
9.1. Normative References 9.1. Normative References
[RFC2119] Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate [RFC2119] Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate
Requirement Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119, DOI 10.17487/ Requirement Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119, DOI 10.17487/
RFC2119, March 1997, RFC2119, March 1997,
<http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc2119>. <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc2119>.
[RFC2328] Moy, J., "OSPF Version 2", STD 54, RFC 2328, DOI 10.17487/ [RFC2328] Moy, J., "OSPF Version 2", STD 54, RFC 2328, DOI 10.17487/
RFC2328, April 1998, RFC2328, April 1998,
<http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc2328>. <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc2328>.
[RFC5250] Berger, L., Bryskin, I., Zinin, A., and R. Coltun, "The [RFC5250] Berger, L., Bryskin, I., Zinin, A., and R. Coltun, "The
OSPF Opaque LSA Option", RFC 5250, DOI 10.17487/RFC5250, OSPF Opaque LSA Option", RFC 5250, DOI 10.17487/RFC5250,
July 2008, <http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc5250>. July 2008, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc5250>.
[RFC3630] Katz, D., Kompella, K., and D. Yeung, "Traffic Engineering [RFC3630] Katz, D., Kompella, K., and D. Yeung, "Traffic Engineering
(TE) Extensions to OSPF Version 2", RFC 3630, (TE) Extensions to OSPF Version 2", RFC 3630,
DOI 10.17487/RFC3630, September 2003, DOI 10.17487/RFC3630, September 2003,
<http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc3630>. <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc3630>.
9.2. Informative References 9.2. Informative References
[RFC3209] Awduche, D., Berger, L., Gan, D., Li, T., Srinivasan, V., [RFC3209] Awduche, D., Berger, L., Gan, D., Li, T., Srinivasan, V.,
and G. Swallow, "RSVP-TE: Extensions to RSVP for LSP and G. Swallow, "RSVP-TE: Extensions to RSVP for LSP
Tunnels", RFC 3209, DOI 10.17487/RFC3209, December 2001, Tunnels", RFC 3209, DOI 10.17487/RFC3209, December 2001,
<http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc3209>. <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc3209>.
Authors' Addresses Authors' Addresses
Huaimo Chen Huaimo Chen
Huawei Technologies Futurewei
Boston, MA Boston, MA
US US
Email: huaimo.chen@huawei.com Email: huaimo.chen@futurewei.com
Mehmet Toy Mehmet Toy
Verizon Verizon
USA USA
Email: mehmet.toy@verizon.com Email: mehmet.toy@verizon.com
Vic Liu Vic Liu
China Mobile China Mobile
No.32 Xuanwumen West Street, Xicheng District No.32 Xuanwumen West Street, Xicheng District
 End of changes. 13 change blocks. 
13 lines changed or deleted 13 lines changed or added

This html diff was produced by rfcdiff 1.48. The latest version is available from http://tools.ietf.org/tools/rfcdiff/