| < draft-chen-pce-h-sdns-02.txt | draft-chen-pce-h-sdns-03.txt > | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PCE Working Group H. Chen | PCE Working Group H. Chen | |||
| Internet-Draft Huawei Technologies | Internet-Draft Huawei Technologies | |||
| Intended status: Standards Track M. Toy | Intended status: Standards Track M. Toy | |||
| Expires: November 5, 2017 Verizon | Expires: May 3, 2018 Verizon | |||
| L. Liu | L. Liu | |||
| Fujitsu | Fujitsu | |||
| V. Liu | V. Liu | |||
| China Mobile | China Mobile | |||
| May 4, 2017 | October 30, 2017 | |||
| PCE Hierarchical SDNs | PCE Hierarchical SDNs | |||
| draft-chen-pce-h-sdns-02 | draft-chen-pce-h-sdns-03 | |||
| Abstract | Abstract | |||
| This document presents extensions to the Path Computation Element | This document presents extensions to the Path Computation Element | |||
| Communication Protocol (PCEP) for supporting a hierarchical SDN | Communication Protocol (PCEP) for supporting a hierarchical SDN | |||
| control system, which comprises multiple SDN controllers controlling | control system, which comprises multiple SDN controllers controlling | |||
| a network with a number of domains. | a network with a number of domains. | |||
| Status of This Memo | Status of This Memo | |||
| skipping to change at page 1, line 38 ¶ | skipping to change at page 1, line 38 ¶ | |||
| Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering | Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering | |||
| Task Force (IETF). Note that other groups may also distribute | Task Force (IETF). Note that other groups may also distribute | |||
| working documents as Internet-Drafts. The list of current Internet- | working documents as Internet-Drafts. The list of current Internet- | |||
| Drafts is at http://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/current/. | Drafts is at http://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/current/. | |||
| Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months | Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months | |||
| and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any | and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any | |||
| time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference | time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference | |||
| material or to cite them other than as "work in progress." | material or to cite them other than as "work in progress." | |||
| This Internet-Draft will expire on November 5, 2017. | This Internet-Draft will expire on May 3, 2018. | |||
| Copyright Notice | Copyright Notice | |||
| Copyright (c) 2017 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the | Copyright (c) 2017 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the | |||
| document authors. All rights reserved. | document authors. All rights reserved. | |||
| This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal | This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal | |||
| Provisions Relating to IETF Documents | Provisions Relating to IETF Documents | |||
| (http://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of | (http://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of | |||
| publication of this document. Please review these documents | publication of this document. Please review these documents | |||
| skipping to change at page 56, line 38 ¶ | skipping to change at page 56, line 38 ¶ | |||
| The authors would like to thank people for their valuable comments on | The authors would like to thank people for their valuable comments on | |||
| this draft. | this draft. | |||
| 10. References | 10. References | |||
| 10.1. Normative References | 10.1. Normative References | |||
| [RFC2119] Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate | [RFC2119] Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate | |||
| Requirement Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119, DOI 10.17487/ | Requirement Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119, DOI 10.17487/ | |||
| RFC2119, March 1997, | RFC2119, March 1997, | |||
| <http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc2119>. | <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc2119>. | |||
| [RFC4655] Farrel, A., Vasseur, J., and J. Ash, "A Path Computation | [RFC4655] Farrel, A., Vasseur, J., and J. Ash, "A Path Computation | |||
| Element (PCE)-Based Architecture", RFC 4655, DOI 10.17487/ | Element (PCE)-Based Architecture", RFC 4655, DOI 10.17487/ | |||
| RFC4655, August 2006, | RFC4655, August 2006, | |||
| <http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc4655>. | <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc4655>. | |||
| [RFC5440] Vasseur, JP., Ed. and JL. Le Roux, Ed., "Path Computation | [RFC5440] Vasseur, JP., Ed. and JL. Le Roux, Ed., "Path Computation | |||
| Element (PCE) Communication Protocol (PCEP)", RFC 5440, | Element (PCE) Communication Protocol (PCEP)", RFC 5440, | |||
| DOI 10.17487/RFC5440, March 2009, | DOI 10.17487/RFC5440, March 2009, | |||
| <http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc5440>. | <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc5440>. | |||
| [RFC5441] Vasseur, JP., Ed., Zhang, R., Bitar, N., and JL. Le Roux, | [RFC5441] Vasseur, JP., Ed., Zhang, R., Bitar, N., and JL. Le Roux, | |||
| "A Backward-Recursive PCE-Based Computation (BRPC) | "A Backward-Recursive PCE-Based Computation (BRPC) | |||
| Procedure to Compute Shortest Constrained Inter-Domain | Procedure to Compute Shortest Constrained Inter-Domain | |||
| Traffic Engineering Label Switched Paths", RFC 5441, | Traffic Engineering Label Switched Paths", RFC 5441, | |||
| DOI 10.17487/RFC5441, April 2009, | DOI 10.17487/RFC5441, April 2009, | |||
| <http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc5441>. | <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc5441>. | |||
| [RFC5392] Chen, M., Zhang, R., and X. Duan, "OSPF Extensions in | [RFC5392] Chen, M., Zhang, R., and X. Duan, "OSPF Extensions in | |||
| Support of Inter-Autonomous System (AS) MPLS and GMPLS | Support of Inter-Autonomous System (AS) MPLS and GMPLS | |||
| Traffic Engineering", RFC 5392, DOI 10.17487/RFC5392, | Traffic Engineering", RFC 5392, DOI 10.17487/RFC5392, | |||
| January 2009, <http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc5392>. | January 2009, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc5392>. | |||
| [RFC5316] Chen, M., Zhang, R., and X. Duan, "ISIS Extensions in | [RFC5316] Chen, M., Zhang, R., and X. Duan, "ISIS Extensions in | |||
| Support of Inter-Autonomous System (AS) MPLS and GMPLS | Support of Inter-Autonomous System (AS) MPLS and GMPLS | |||
| Traffic Engineering", RFC 5316, DOI 10.17487/RFC5316, | Traffic Engineering", RFC 5316, DOI 10.17487/RFC5316, | |||
| December 2008, <http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc5316>. | December 2008, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc5316>. | |||
| [RFC5305] Li, T. and H. Smit, "IS-IS Extensions for Traffic | [RFC5305] Li, T. and H. Smit, "IS-IS Extensions for Traffic | |||
| Engineering", RFC 5305, DOI 10.17487/RFC5305, | Engineering", RFC 5305, DOI 10.17487/RFC5305, | |||
| October 2008, <http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc5305>. | October 2008, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc5305>. | |||
| [RFC3630] Katz, D., Kompella, K., and D. Yeung, "Traffic Engineering | [RFC3630] Katz, D., Kompella, K., and D. Yeung, "Traffic Engineering | |||
| (TE) Extensions to OSPF Version 2", RFC 3630, | (TE) Extensions to OSPF Version 2", RFC 3630, | |||
| DOI 10.17487/RFC3630, September 2003, | DOI 10.17487/RFC3630, September 2003, | |||
| <http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc3630>. | <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc3630>. | |||
| 10.2. Informative References | 10.2. Informative References | |||
| [RFC1136] Hares, S. and D. Katz, "Administrative Domains and Routing | [RFC1136] Hares, S. and D. Katz, "Administrative Domains and Routing | |||
| Domains: A model for routing in the Internet", RFC 1136, | Domains: A model for routing in the Internet", RFC 1136, | |||
| DOI 10.17487/RFC1136, December 1989, | DOI 10.17487/RFC1136, December 1989, | |||
| <http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc1136>. | <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc1136>. | |||
| [RFC4105] Le Roux, J., Ed., Vasseur, J., Ed., and J. Boyle, Ed., | [RFC4105] Le Roux, J., Ed., Vasseur, J., Ed., and J. Boyle, Ed., | |||
| "Requirements for Inter-Area MPLS Traffic Engineering", | "Requirements for Inter-Area MPLS Traffic Engineering", | |||
| RFC 4105, DOI 10.17487/RFC4105, June 2005, | RFC 4105, DOI 10.17487/RFC4105, June 2005, | |||
| <http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc4105>. | <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc4105>. | |||
| [RFC4216] Zhang, R., Ed. and J. Vasseur, Ed., "MPLS Inter-Autonomous | [RFC4216] Zhang, R., Ed. and J. Vasseur, Ed., "MPLS Inter-Autonomous | |||
| System (AS) Traffic Engineering (TE) Requirements", | System (AS) Traffic Engineering (TE) Requirements", | |||
| RFC 4216, DOI 10.17487/RFC4216, November 2005, | RFC 4216, DOI 10.17487/RFC4216, November 2005, | |||
| <http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc4216>. | <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc4216>. | |||
| [RFC6006] Zhao, Q., Ed., King, D., Ed., Verhaeghe, F., Takeda, T., | [RFC6006] Zhao, Q., Ed., King, D., Ed., Verhaeghe, F., Takeda, T., | |||
| Ali, Z., and J. Meuric, "Extensions to the Path | Ali, Z., and J. Meuric, "Extensions to the Path | |||
| Computation Element Communication Protocol (PCEP) for | Computation Element Communication Protocol (PCEP) for | |||
| Point-to-Multipoint Traffic Engineering Label Switched | Point-to-Multipoint Traffic Engineering Label Switched | |||
| Paths", RFC 6006, DOI 10.17487/RFC6006, September 2010, | Paths", RFC 6006, DOI 10.17487/RFC6006, September 2010, | |||
| <http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc6006>. | <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc6006>. | |||
| [RFC6805] King, D., Ed. and A. Farrel, Ed., "The Application of the | [RFC6805] King, D., Ed. and A. Farrel, Ed., "The Application of the | |||
| Path Computation Element Architecture to the Determination | Path Computation Element Architecture to the Determination | |||
| of a Sequence of Domains in MPLS and GMPLS", RFC 6805, | of a Sequence of Domains in MPLS and GMPLS", RFC 6805, | |||
| DOI 10.17487/RFC6805, November 2012, | DOI 10.17487/RFC6805, November 2012, | |||
| <http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc6805>. | <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc6805>. | |||
| Appendix A. Details on Embedded Encoding of Messages | Appendix A. Details on Embedded Encoding of Messages | |||
| A new options field of 3 bits is defined in the flags field of the RP | A new options field of 3 bits is defined in the flags field of the RP | |||
| object to tell the receiver of the message that the request/reply is | object to tell the receiver of the message that the request/reply is | |||
| for one of the five request/reply messages for supporting HSCS as | for one of the five request/reply messages for supporting HSCS as | |||
| follows: | follows: | |||
| Options Meaning | Options Meaning | |||
| 1 Path Segment Computation Request/Reply | 1 Path Segment Computation Request/Reply | |||
| End of changes. 17 change blocks. | ||||
| 17 lines changed or deleted | 17 lines changed or added | |||
This html diff was produced by rfcdiff 1.48. The latest version is available from http://tools.ietf.org/tools/rfcdiff/ | ||||