| < draft-deng-multimob-ps-mobilemulticast-01.txt | draft-deng-multimob-ps-mobilemulticast-02.txt > | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Network Working Group H. Deng | Network Working Group H. Deng | |||
| Internet-Draft China Mobile | Internet-Draft China Mobile | |||
| Intended status: Standards Track P. Yang | Intended status: Standards Track P. Yang | |||
| Expires: August 23, 2008 Hitachi (China) R&D Corporation | Expires: January 14, 2009 Hitachi | |||
| Q. Wu | Q. Wu | |||
| Tsinghua Univ. | Tsinghua Univ. | |||
| February 20, 2008 | July 13, 2008 | |||
| Problem Statement and Requirement: Mobile Multicast | Problem Statement and Requirement: Mobile Multicast | |||
| draft-deng-multimob-ps-mobilemulticast-01 | draft-deng-multimob-ps-mobilemulticast-02 | |||
| Status of this Memo | Status of this Memo | |||
| By submitting this Internet-Draft, each author represents that any | By submitting this Internet-Draft, each author represents that any | |||
| applicable patent or other IPR claims of which he or she is aware | applicable patent or other IPR claims of which he or she is aware | |||
| have been or will be disclosed, and any of which he or she becomes | have been or will be disclosed, and any of which he or she becomes | |||
| aware will be disclosed, in accordance with Section 6 of BCP 79. | aware will be disclosed, in accordance with Section 6 of BCP 79. | |||
| Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering | Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering | |||
| Task Force (IETF), its areas, and its working groups. Note that | Task Force (IETF), its areas, and its working groups. Note that | |||
| skipping to change at page 1, line 37 ¶ | skipping to change at page 1, line 37 ¶ | |||
| and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any | and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any | |||
| time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference | time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference | |||
| material or to cite them other than as "work in progress." | material or to cite them other than as "work in progress." | |||
| The list of current Internet-Drafts can be accessed at | The list of current Internet-Drafts can be accessed at | |||
| http://www.ietf.org/ietf/1id-abstracts.txt. | http://www.ietf.org/ietf/1id-abstracts.txt. | |||
| The list of Internet-Draft Shadow Directories can be accessed at | The list of Internet-Draft Shadow Directories can be accessed at | |||
| http://www.ietf.org/shadow.html. | http://www.ietf.org/shadow.html. | |||
| This Internet-Draft will expire on August 23, 2008. | This Internet-Draft will expire on January 14, 2009. | |||
| Copyright Notice | ||||
| Copyright (C) The IETF Trust (2008). | ||||
| Abstract | Abstract | |||
| This document discusses the problem and requirement of multicast | This document discusses the problem and requirement of multicast | |||
| solution in the mobile networks. One current issue in mobile | solution in the mobile networks. One current issue in mobile | |||
| multicast solution has been raised and requirements of mobile IPTV on | multicast solution has been raised and requirements of mobile IPTV on | |||
| multicast mobility will also be summarized especially for some | multicast mobility will also be summarized especially for some | |||
| mechanisms such as the tunneling, service capability and security | mechanisms such as the tunneling, service capability and security | |||
| discussion which is basis of supporting the mobile IPTV applications. | discussion which is basis of supporting the mobile IPTV applications. | |||
| Table of Contents | Table of Contents | |||
| 1. Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 | 1. Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 | |||
| 2. Requirements on multicast mobility management for mobile | 2. IP mobility management multicast support in mobile network . . 4 | |||
| IPTV . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 | 2.1. Mobile IPTV multicast framework . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 | |||
| 2.1. (Mobile) IPTV multicast framework . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 | 2.2. Mobile IPv4 support Multicast . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 | |||
| 2.2. Service Requirements Mobile IPTV multicast delivery . . . 5 | 2.3. Mobile IPv6 support Multicast . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 | |||
| 2.3. Correspondence Mobile IPv6 to support Multicast for | 3. Security Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7 | |||
| mobile IPTV? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7 | 4. IANA Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8 | |||
| 3. One Problem about Mobile Multicast . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9 | 5. Normative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9 | |||
| 4. Security Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10 | Authors' Addresses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10 | |||
| 5. IANA Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11 | Intellectual Property and Copyright Statements . . . . . . . . . . 11 | |||
| 6. Conclusion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12 | ||||
| 7. References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13 | ||||
| 7.1. Normative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13 | ||||
| 7.2. Informative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13 | ||||
| Authors' Addresses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15 | ||||
| Intellectual Property and Copyright Statements . . . . . . . . . . 16 | ||||
| 1. Introduction | 1. Introduction | |||
| While more and more operators begin to provide the wireless broadband | While more and more operators begin to provide the wireless broadband | |||
| network systems, the needs for multicast and and broadcast service in | network systems, the needs for multicast and and broadcast service in | |||
| mobile network become promising. Recently IPTV might become one of | mobile network become promising. Recently IPTV might become one of | |||
| the killer applications for mobile network. Mobile IPTV service is a | the desirable applications for mobile network. Mobile IPTV service | |||
| kind of A/V services which are combined with interactive data for the | is a kind of A/V services which are combined with interactive data | |||
| related or supplementary information of A/V program using bi- | for the related or supplementary information of A/V program using bi- | |||
| directional wireless broadband links. User can enjoy the downlink | directional wireless broadband links. User can enjoy the downlink | |||
| A/V stream and access more detailed or value-added information via | A/V stream and access more detailed or value-added information via | |||
| uplink simultaneously. Mobile IPTV service, which is also described | uplink simultaneously. | |||
| as place-shifting IPTV service in [IPTV.SR.SC], basically is to | ||||
| ensure continuous and original IPTV experiences for the users who | ||||
| move to the other place from where he or she originally subscribed | ||||
| for. | ||||
| As specified in [IPTV.SR.SC], mobile IPTV (place-shifting) could be | ||||
| divided into two categories, depending on who is taking care of | ||||
| redistributing the IPTV traffic: | ||||
| The subscriber-based solution requires the device of subsrcriber to | ||||
| redistributes traffic to the place where the user is currently | ||||
| located. | ||||
| The network-based one need the service provider send the IPTV traffic | ||||
| to the moved place. while mobile IPTV users handover from one network | ||||
| domain to another network domain, the network side should guarantee | ||||
| the service continuity and smoothness. | ||||
| Mobile IPTV service is a mass multimedia group communication service. | ||||
| It has more requirements on network bandwidth and QoS/QoE compared | ||||
| with best effort data services. As desribed in [Schmidt07], | ||||
| multicast is optimal to support this kind of group communication | ||||
| service in mobile network. The problems and survey could be found in | ||||
| [Schmidt07]. This document only discusses the problems and | ||||
| requirement of mobile multicast. | ||||
| In the IPv6 network, Mobile IPv6 (MIPv6)[RFC3775] is the basic way to | In the mobile network, Mobile IPv4 (MIPv4)[RFC3344], Mobile | |||
| support mobility. It allows the mobile nodes(MN) to maintain the | IPv6[RFC3775], DSMIP6 [DSMIPv6] and PMIP6[Gundavelli08]is the basic | |||
| reachability while moving in the IPv6 network. After registration to | way to support IP mobility management. It allows the mobile | |||
| home agent(HA), the packets destined to MN could be routed correctly | nodes(MN) to maintain the reachability while moving in the IP | |||
| by using the end-to-end tunnel, while MN is away from the home | network. After registration to home agent(HA), the packets destined | |||
| network. MIPv6 has some other extensions (HMIP6 [RFC4140], FMIP6 | to MN could be routed correctly by using the tunneling mechanism, | |||
| [RFC4068], PMIP6 [Gundavelli08])for different application schemes. | while MN is away from the home network. | |||
| MIPv6 has two methods for multicast. [Schmidt07] has already | ||||
| analysis on the Prons and Cons of these two ways. | ||||
| Besides the MIP camp, there are some specific multicast solutions in | But the current IP mobility management mechanism lack of full support | |||
| 3GPP(MBMS)[MBMS] and 3GPP2 network(BCMCS)[BCMCS]. There is the | of multicast service.This document will illustrate the main issue of | |||
| possiblity that access gateway may experience the overload to support | them. Since DSMIP6 is principally similar to MIP6, so it will not be | |||
| this kind of services. Anyhow, In the real deployment, BCMCS/MBMS | illustrated independently in this document. | |||
| may not always available anywhere in operators' cellular network,they | ||||
| could also support the mobile IPTV services in cellular networks. | ||||
| 2. Requirements on multicast mobility management for mobile IPTV | 2. IP mobility management multicast support in mobile network | |||
| 2.1. (Mobile) IPTV multicast framework | 2.1. Mobile IPTV multicast framework | |||
| [IPTV.MC.FR] and [IPTV.FR] make detailed description on IPTV | ITU make detailed description on IPTV architecture and multicast | |||
| architecture and multicast framewroks. Mobile IPTV content delivery | framewroks. Mobile IPTV content delivery infrastructure may consists | |||
| infrastructure may consists of four different layers, i.e. Content | of four different layers, i.e. Content Source, Core, Metro(Edge), | |||
| Source, Core, Metro(Edge), and Access. Content source is where IPTV | and Access. Content source is where IPTV service contents are | |||
| service contents are originated and they can be placed in either | originated and they can be placed in either inside or outside of | |||
| inside or outside of delivery infrastructure. Core is service/ | delivery infrastructure. Core is service/network provider_is | |||
| network provider_is backbone infrastructure. Metro, in other words | backbone infrastructure. Metro, in other words Aggregation or Edge, | |||
| Aggregation or Edge, is where it connects and aggregates between core | is where it connects and aggregates between core and access. Access | |||
| and access. Access is user domain that includes last mile. | is user domain that includes last mile. | |||
| The transport profile of Mobile IPTV are shown in the picture below: | The transport profile of Mobile IPTV are shown in the picture below: | |||
| Wired or Wireless | Wired or Wireless | |||
| | | | | |||
| | +.........................................+ | | +.........................................+ | |||
| +----------+ | . Mobile IPTV Transport Profile . | +----------+ | . Mobile IPTV Transport Profile . | |||
| | Mobile | V . +--------+ +------+ +------+ . | | Mobile | V . +--------+ +------+ +------+ . | |||
| | IPTV |---------| Access |------| Edge |------| Core | . | | IPTV |---------| Access |------| Edge |------| Core | . | |||
| | Terminal | . +--------+ +------+ +------+ . | | Terminal | . +--------+ +------+ +------+ . | |||
| skipping to change at page 5, line 40 ¶ | skipping to change at page 4, line 40 ¶ | |||
| . +-------------+ || || . | . +-------------+ || || . | |||
| . | Content |==============|| || . | . | Content |==============|| || . | |||
| . | Source | || . | . | Source | || . | |||
| . +-------------+ || . | . +-------------+ || . | |||
| +................\\...................||..+ | +................\\...................||..+ | |||
| \\ || | \\ || | |||
| +----------------+ || | +----------------+ || | |||
| | content source |== | | content source |== | |||
| +----------------+ | +----------------+ | |||
| Besides the functions showen in the picture above, multicast delivery | In the case of IPTV support in mobile network, such architecture will | |||
| control functions are needed for the Mobile IPTV Transport profile. | be considered and mapped to the network entity of IP mobility | |||
| They may be responsible for the multicast tree managerment, | management. | |||
| membership management, authentication and authorization of members, | ||||
| QoS management, load and traffic mamangement | ||||
| 2.2. Service Requirements Mobile IPTV multicast delivery | ||||
| [IPTV.SR.REQ] specified the service requirements of (Mobile) IPTV. | ||||
| [IPTV.QoE.REQ] gives the requirements related to QoS and QoE. Mobile | ||||
| IPTV service includes multiple type of services, such as video, | ||||
| audio, data(captures, EPG, etc.). Video service need much bandwidth | ||||
| and also should be a service with high service quality. Network | ||||
| should implement traffic control for high priority multicast traffic | ||||
| to ensure the QOS of multicast. Specifically, following functions | ||||
| should be supported in the mobile network: | ||||
| (1)Total Multicast Bandwidth: access node should be able to control | ||||
| on total bandwidth of a user port that can be used for multicast | ||||
| service; | ||||
| (2)Current Available Bandwidth: the access node should be able to | ||||
| aware of current available bandwidth that can be used for multicast | ||||
| service, specifically, can be total multicast bandwidth consumed | ||||
| multicast bandwidth; | ||||
| (3)Connection Admission Control (CAC): It is required that Connection | ||||
| Admission Control supported in Access network based on available | ||||
| resources. When end user subscribes to a multicast stream, access | ||||
| network will perform CAC: check if current available resources are | ||||
| enough for the new service subscription. The resources can be | ||||
| bandwidth, connection number and user service privilege profile. | ||||
| (4) Network Attachment Control: The attachment control should be | 2.2. Mobile IPv4 support Multicast | |||
| supported by the multicast control function and multicast replication | ||||
| function. The multicast control function should build the privilege | ||||
| table for multicast users, and the multicast replication function | ||||
| should forward multicast media content to users which have the | ||||
| privilege of IPTV multicast services. | ||||
| (5) Packet loss: depending on the bit rate and video/audio profiles, | Section 4.3 and 4.4 of [RFC3344] discuss the support of multicast and | |||
| the video and audio streams have different levels of sensitiveness on | broadcast. In order to receive multicast packet through it's home | |||
| packet loss. [IPTV.QoE.REQ] gives the detail of packet loss | network, a mobile node MUST join the multicast group in one of two | |||
| requirements for all kinds of real-time mobile IPTV media streams. | ways. One is based on co-located care-of address, the other is based | |||
| The multicast mobile network should gurantee not only the duration of | on the home address (foreign agent care-of address). In both cases, | |||
| single error, but also the total packet loss rate. Besides the | a mobile node tunnels IGMP messages to its home agent, the home agent | |||
| packet loss at radio interface, the multicast handoff will also incur | forwards multicast datagrams down the tunnel to the mobile node. | |||
| some packet loss. | ||||
| (6) Packet priority: considering the video/audio compression | Access network | |||
| characteristics, different packets may have different importance. It | (Wired or Wireless) IP multicast | |||
| is recommended to provide better guarantee for important packets. | | packets | |||
| +----+ | | | ||||
| | MN1| V +------+ +------+ | | ||||
| +----+---------------|======|=============| | | | ||||
| +----+ | FA | | HA | V | ||||
| | MN2|---------------|======|=============| |----- | ||||
| +----+ +------+ +------+ | ||||
| (7) Synchronization: Mobile IPTV services is also an integrated | Figure 1: Nested tunneling in MIP4 for Multicast | |||
| service with synchronized multiple streams. Although the service | ||||
| provider and the terminal may have some solution to maintain | ||||
| synchronized streams, the mobile network may also incur delay and | ||||
| jitter. So, the mobile multicast should provide some machenism to | ||||
| ensure the synchronization of mobile IPTV streams. | ||||
| (8) Notification: there are some mobile IPTV service events, which | In the case of co-located care-of address, the home agent SHOULD | |||
| will trigger notification messages. The multicast mobile network | tunnel the datagram to this care-of address directly; In the case of | |||
| should understand such kind of notifications and make the actions | foreign agent care-of address, the home agent MUST first encapsulate | |||
| accordingly. In this sense, a notifiction solution among the nodes | the datagram in a unicast datagram addressed to the mobile node's | |||
| of multicast mobile network mya be useful. | home address and then MUST tunnel the resulting datagram (nested | |||
| tunneling) to the mobile node's care-of address.If there are more | ||||
| than 500 MNs under the same FA, there will be 500 tunnels between HA | ||||
| and FA to transmit multicast packets. | ||||
| 2.3. Correspondence Mobile IPv6 to support Multicast for mobile IPTV? | 2.3. Mobile IPv6 support Multicast | |||
| Many works have made the analysis on the multicast solution in mobile | In this document, the analysis on multicast of mobile IPv6 will be | |||
| IPv6. [Schmidt07] has the summary of all the related works. In this | made only based on mobile IPTV. The Home Agent(HA) may be part of | |||
| document, the analysis on multicast of mobile IPv6 will be made only | the core function in the mobile IPTV framework. The edge function | |||
| based on mobile IPTV. The Home Agent(HA) may be part of the core | normally coould be considered as the access gateway(AGW) in the | |||
| function in the mobile IPTV framework. The edge function normally | deployment of mobile IPv6 in mobile network. | |||
| coould be considered as the access gateway(AGW) in the deployment of | ||||
| mobile IPv6 in mobile network. | ||||
| Access network | Access network | |||
| (Wired or Wireless) IP multicast | (Wired or Wireless) IP multicast | |||
| +------+ | packets | +------+ | packets | |||
| | | | | | | | | | | |||
| | MN | V +------+ +------+ | | | MN | V +------+ +------+ | | |||
| | |===============|======|=============| | | | | |===============|======|=============| | | | |||
| +------+ | | | | V | +------+ | | | | V | |||
| bi-dictional tunnel | AR | | HA |----- | bi-dictional tunnel | AR | | HA |----- | |||
| +------+ | | | | | +------+ | | | | | |||
| | |===============|======|=============| | | | |===============|======|=============| | | |||
| | MN | +------+ +------+ | | MN | +------+ +------+ | |||
| | | | | | | |||
| +------+ | +------+ | |||
| Bandwidth efficiency: The advantage of the bi-directional tunneling | Figure 2: Nested tunneling in MIP6 for Multicast | |||
| solution (as the above figure) is its simplicity and the transparency | ||||
| of handover to the multicast operation. This approach is inefficient | ||||
| because of the tunnel overhead and delay. The multiple unicasting | ||||
| tunneling problem for multicast between HA and MN should be solved to | ||||
| improve the bandwidth efficientcy (as the below figure). In the | ||||
| deployment of mobile IPv6 in wireless network (cellular, WLAN or | ||||
| WIMAX), HA (core) is relatively close to the AGW(Edge). So, the | ||||
| delay issue because of triangle tunneling may not be so severe. | ||||
| Access network | ||||
| (Wired or Wireless) IP multicast | ||||
| +------+ | packets | ||||
| | | | | | ||||
| | MN | V +------+ +------+ | | ||||
| | |===============|======| | | | | ||||
| +------+ | | | | V | ||||
| bi-dictional tunnel | AR |=============| HA |----- | ||||
| +------+ | | | | | ||||
| | |===============|======| | | | ||||
| | MN | +------+ +------+ | ||||
| | | | ||||
| +------+ | ||||
| Packet loss: the mobile IPTV services consist of real-time video/ | ||||
| audio streams. So, the short delay/seamless multicast handoff of | ||||
| mobile IPv6 is surely useful. | ||||
| Synchronization: the requirements include the synchronization among | ||||
| all the nodes of mobile IPv6 and the synchronization between the | ||||
| mobile IPTV streams. Firstly, a precise time reference is needed in | ||||
| the multicast mobile network. Secondly, the synchronization | ||||
| information is necessary in the mobile IPTV streams. Lastly, some | ||||
| notification messages may be useful to share some time-based mobile | ||||
| IPTV events among mobile IPv6 nodes. It's also useful for precise | ||||
| mobile IPTV and multicast network charging.Proxy Mobile IPv6 has some | ||||
| basic requirement about synchronization between LMA and MAG for | ||||
| several considerations. | ||||
| Notification: it's recommended to have some notification machenism in | Notification: it's recommended to have some notification machenism in | |||
| mobile IPv6. It's useful to do synchronous actions for incoming | mobile IPv6. It's useful to do synchronous actions for incoming | |||
| mobile IPTV service events. | mobile IPTV service events. | |||
| 3. One Problem about Mobile Multicast | By the way, it is recommended that DSMIP6 has similar situation, and | |||
| Proxy mobile IPv6 will be described in a seperate document. | ||||
| The current MBMS which is defined in 3GPP [MBMS] may experience | ||||
| overload for each network entity such as access gateway and | ||||
| broadcast/multicast server, in the case of mobile node frequently | ||||
| join and quit from the multicast group, multicast service | ||||
| announcement may also need to be reconsidered. | ||||
| 4. Security Considerations | 3. Security Considerations | |||
| Multicast security is one of the most crucial issues in mobile IPTV | Multicast security is one of the most crucial issues in mobile IPTV | |||
| service such that it is required to provide security capabilities to | service such that it is required to provide security capabilities to | |||
| protect mobile IPTV multicast network from any malicious attempts | protect mobile IPTV multicast network from any malicious attempts | |||
| caused by multicast security holes. Security itself is too diverse | caused by multicast security holes such as denial of service attacks. | |||
| to break down to the specific multicast purpose; however functional | ||||
| requirements of multicast security for each network elements should | ||||
| be clearly defined and should provide capabilities along with the | ||||
| definitions. | ||||
| As specified in [IPTV.SEC], the mobile IPTV security requirements may | ||||
| have following aspects: | ||||
| - IPTV architecture is required to be robust against denial of | ||||
| service attacks targeting any multicast mechanisms. | ||||
| - Multicast system architecture is required to provide a mechanism of | ||||
| multicast protocol adjacency authentication in order to establish a | ||||
| reliable peer. | ||||
| - Multicast system architecture is required to provide an admission | ||||
| control mechanism to regulate any multicast events. | ||||
| - Multicast system architecture is required to be independent of | ||||
| adjacent domain such that it shall not affect the adjacent multicast | ||||
| domain without permission. | ||||
| - Multicast system architecture is required to provide a mechanism to | After the integration IP mobility management like MIP4, MIP6 with the | |||
| check integrity of multicast contents before service delivery such | multicast service, it should not depreciate the security protection | |||
| that it prevents unauthorized contents from becoming the content | of the basic IP mobility management mechanism. | |||
| source. | ||||
| 5. IANA Considerations | 4. IANA Considerations | |||
| This document makes no requests to IANA. | This document makes no requests to IANA. | |||
| 6. Conclusion | 5. Normative References | |||
| This draft discusses multicast mobility for mobile network and mobile | ||||
| IPTV services. Firstly the mobile IPTV multicast framework is | ||||
| described followed by its the requirements on multicast mobile | ||||
| networks. The impacts on current mobile IPv6 multicast solutions are | ||||
| also discussed based on the requirements of mobile IPTV. Security | ||||
| issues are discussed lastly in this document. | ||||
| 7. References | ||||
| 7.1. Normative References | [DSMIPv6] Soliman, H., "Mobile IPv6 support for dual stack Hosts and | |||
| Routers (DSMIPv6)", | ||||
| draft-ietf-mip6-nemo-v4traversal-06.txt (work in | ||||
| progress), November 2007. | ||||
| [Gundavelli08] | [Gundavelli08] | |||
| Gundavelli, S., "Proxy Mobile IPv6", | Gundavelli, S., "Proxy Mobile IPv6", | |||
| draft-ietf-netlmm-proxymip6-10.txt (work in progress), | draft-ietf-netlmm-proxymip6-18.txt (work in progress), | |||
| February 2008. | May 2008. | |||
| [RFC3344] Perkins, C., "IP Mobility Support for IPv4", RFC 3344, | ||||
| August 2002. | ||||
| [RFC3775] Johnson, D., Perkins, C., and J. Arkko, "Mobility Support | [RFC3775] Johnson, D., Perkins, C., and J. Arkko, "Mobility Support | |||
| in IPv6", RFC 3775, June 2004. | in IPv6", RFC 3775, June 2004. | |||
| 7.2. Informative References | ||||
| [BCMCS] 3GPP2, "Broadcast/Multicast Services - Stage 1, Revision | ||||
| A", 3GPP2 S.R0030-A V1.0, Feb. 2004. | ||||
| [IPTV.FR] Xie, W. and Will. , "IPTV Architecture", ITU-T IPTV Focus | ||||
| Group on IPTV FG-IPTV-DOC-0084, May 2007. | ||||
| [IPTV.MC.FR] | ||||
| Seo, Y., "IPTV Multicast Frameworks", ITU-T IPTV Focus | ||||
| Group on IPTV FG-IPTV-DOC-0092, May 2007. | ||||
| [IPTV.QoE.REQ] | ||||
| Takahashi, A., "Quality of Experience Requirements for | ||||
| IPTV", ITU-T IPTV Focus Group on IPTV FG-IPTV-DOC-0086, | ||||
| May 2007. | ||||
| [IPTV.SEC] | ||||
| Xie, W., "IPTV Security Aspects", ITU-T IPTV Focus Group | ||||
| on IPTV FG-IPTV-DOC-0090, May 2007. | ||||
| [IPTV.SR.REQ] | ||||
| Becha, B., "IPTV service requirements", ITU-T IPTV Focus | ||||
| Group on IPTV FG-IPTV-DOC-0083, May 2007. | ||||
| [IPTV.SR.SC] | ||||
| Li, M., "IPTV service scenarios", ITU-T IPTV Focus Group | ||||
| on IPTV FG-IPTV-DOC-0085, May 2007. | ||||
| [MBMS] 3GPP, "Multimedia Broadcast/Multicast Service (MBMS) | ||||
| Architecture and functional description", 3GPP TS | ||||
| 23.246 V8.0.0, September 2007. | ||||
| [RFC4068] Koodli, R., "Fast Handovers for Mobile IPv6", RFC 4068, | ||||
| July 2005. | ||||
| [RFC4140] Soliman, H., Castelluccia, C., El Malki, K., and L. | ||||
| Bellier, "Hierarchical Mobile IPv6 Mobility Management | ||||
| (HMIPv6)", RFC 4140, August 2005. | ||||
| [Schmidt07] | ||||
| Schmidt, T., "Multicast Mobility in MIPv6: Problem | ||||
| Statement and Brief Survey", | ||||
| draft-irtf-mobopts-mmcastv6-ps-02.txt (work in progress), | ||||
| November 2007. | ||||
| Authors' Addresses | Authors' Addresses | |||
| Hui Deng | Hui Deng | |||
| China Mobile | China Mobile | |||
| 53A,Xibianmennei Ave., | 53A,Xibianmennei Ave., | |||
| Xuanwu District, | Xuanwu District, | |||
| Beijing 100053 | Beijing 100053 | |||
| China | China | |||
| Email: denghui02@gmail.com | Email: denghui02@gmail.com | |||
| Peng Yang | Peng Yang | |||
| Hitachi (China) R&D Corporation | Hitachi | |||
| 301, North Wing, Tower C Raycom Infotech Park | 301, North Wing, Tower C Raycom Infotech Park | |||
| 2 kexueyuan Nanlu | 2 kexueyuan Nanlu | |||
| Haidian District | Haidian District | |||
| Beijing, 100080 | Beijing, 100080 | |||
| P.R. China | P.R. China | |||
| Phone: +861082862918(ext.)328 | Phone: +861082862918(ext.)328 | |||
| Email: pyang@hitachi.cn | Email: pyang@hitachi.cn | |||
| Qian Wu | Qian Wu | |||
| skipping to change at page 16, line 44 ¶ | skipping to change at line 283 ¶ | |||
| attempt made to obtain a general license or permission for the use of | attempt made to obtain a general license or permission for the use of | |||
| such proprietary rights by implementers or users of this | such proprietary rights by implementers or users of this | |||
| specification can be obtained from the IETF on-line IPR repository at | specification can be obtained from the IETF on-line IPR repository at | |||
| http://www.ietf.org/ipr. | http://www.ietf.org/ipr. | |||
| The IETF invites any interested party to bring to its attention any | The IETF invites any interested party to bring to its attention any | |||
| copyrights, patents or patent applications, or other proprietary | copyrights, patents or patent applications, or other proprietary | |||
| rights that may cover technology that may be required to implement | rights that may cover technology that may be required to implement | |||
| this standard. Please address the information to the IETF at | this standard. Please address the information to the IETF at | |||
| ietf-ipr@ietf.org. | ietf-ipr@ietf.org. | |||
| Acknowledgment | ||||
| Funding for the RFC Editor function is provided by the IETF | ||||
| Administrative Support Activity (IASA). | ||||
| End of changes. 32 change blocks. | ||||
| 279 lines changed or deleted | 94 lines changed or added | |||
This html diff was produced by rfcdiff 1.48. The latest version is available from http://tools.ietf.org/tools/rfcdiff/ | ||||