| < draft-ietf-6lo-6lobac-05.txt | draft-ietf-6lo-6lobac-06.txt > | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6Lo Working Group K. Lynn, Ed. | 6Lo Working Group K. Lynn, Ed. | |||
| Internet-Draft Verizon Labs | Internet-Draft Verizon Labs | |||
| Intended status: Standards Track J. Martocci | Intended status: Standards Track J. Martocci | |||
| Expires: December 18, 2016 Johnson Controls | Expires: May 4, 2017 Johnson Controls | |||
| C. Neilson | C. Neilson | |||
| Delta Controls | Delta Controls | |||
| S. Donaldson | S. Donaldson | |||
| Honeywell | Honeywell | |||
| June 16, 2016 | October 31, 2016 | |||
| Transmission of IPv6 over MS/TP Networks | Transmission of IPv6 over MS/TP Networks | |||
| draft-ietf-6lo-6lobac-05 | draft-ietf-6lo-6lobac-06 | |||
| Abstract | Abstract | |||
| Master-Slave/Token-Passing (MS/TP) is a medium access control method | Master-Slave/Token-Passing (MS/TP) is a medium access control method | |||
| for the RS-485 physical layer, which is used extensively in building | for the RS-485 physical layer, which is used extensively in building | |||
| automation networks. This specification defines the frame format for | automation networks. This specification defines the frame format for | |||
| transmission of IPv6 packets and the method of forming link-local and | transmission of IPv6 packets and the method of forming link-local and | |||
| statelessly autoconfigured IPv6 addresses on MS/TP networks. | statelessly autoconfigured IPv6 addresses on MS/TP networks. | |||
| Status of This Memo | Status of This Memo | |||
| skipping to change at page 1, line 39 ¶ | skipping to change at page 1, line 39 ¶ | |||
| Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering | Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering | |||
| Task Force (IETF). Note that other groups may also distribute | Task Force (IETF). Note that other groups may also distribute | |||
| working documents as Internet-Drafts. The list of current Internet- | working documents as Internet-Drafts. The list of current Internet- | |||
| Drafts is at http://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/current/. | Drafts is at http://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/current/. | |||
| Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months | Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months | |||
| and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any | and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any | |||
| time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference | time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference | |||
| material or to cite them other than as "work in progress." | material or to cite them other than as "work in progress." | |||
| This Internet-Draft will expire on December 18, 2016. | This Internet-Draft will expire on May 4, 2017. | |||
| Copyright Notice | Copyright Notice | |||
| Copyright (c) 2016 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the | Copyright (c) 2016 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the | |||
| document authors. All rights reserved. | document authors. All rights reserved. | |||
| This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal | This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal | |||
| Provisions Relating to IETF Documents | Provisions Relating to IETF Documents | |||
| (http://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of | (http://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of | |||
| publication of this document. Please review these documents | publication of this document. Please review these documents | |||
| skipping to change at page 2, line 26 ¶ | skipping to change at page 2, line 26 ¶ | |||
| 5. LoBAC Adaptation Layer . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7 | 5. LoBAC Adaptation Layer . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7 | |||
| 6. Stateless Address Autoconfiguration . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8 | 6. Stateless Address Autoconfiguration . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8 | |||
| 7. IPv6 Link Local Address . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8 | 7. IPv6 Link Local Address . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8 | |||
| 8. Unicast Address Mapping . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9 | 8. Unicast Address Mapping . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9 | |||
| 9. Multicast Address Mapping . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9 | 9. Multicast Address Mapping . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9 | |||
| 10. Header Compression . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10 | 10. Header Compression . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10 | |||
| 11. IANA Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10 | 11. IANA Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10 | |||
| 12. Security Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10 | 12. Security Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10 | |||
| 13. Acknowledgments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11 | 13. Acknowledgments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11 | |||
| 14. References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11 | 14. References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11 | |||
| Appendix A. Abstract MAC Interface . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13 | Appendix A. Abstract MAC Interface . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14 | |||
| Appendix B. Consistent Overhead Byte Stuffing [COBS] . . . . . . 16 | Appendix B. Consistent Overhead Byte Stuffing [COBS] . . . . . . 16 | |||
| Appendix C. Encoded CRC-32K [CRC32K] . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19 | Appendix C. Encoded CRC-32K [CRC32K] . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19 | |||
| Appendix D. Example 6LoBAC Packet Decode . . . . . . . . . . . . 21 | Appendix D. Example 6LoBAC Packet Decode . . . . . . . . . . . . 22 | |||
| Authors' Addresses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 26 | Authors' Addresses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 27 | |||
| 1. Introduction | 1. Introduction | |||
| Master-Slave/Token-Passing (MS/TP) is a medium access control (MAC) | Master-Slave/Token-Passing (MS/TP) is a medium access control (MAC) | |||
| protocol for the RS-485 [TIA-485-A] physical layer, which is used | protocol for the RS-485 [TIA-485-A] physical layer, which is used | |||
| extensively in building automation networks. This specification | extensively in building automation networks. This specification | |||
| defines the frame format for transmission of IPv6 [RFC2460] packets | defines the frame format for transmission of IPv6 [RFC2460] packets | |||
| and the method of forming link-local and statelessly autoconfigured | and the method of forming link-local and statelessly autoconfigured | |||
| IPv6 addresses on MS/TP networks. The general approach is to adapt | IPv6 addresses on MS/TP networks. The general approach is to adapt | |||
| elements of the 6LoWPAN specifications [RFC4944], [RFC6282], and | elements of the 6LoWPAN specifications [RFC4944], [RFC6282], and | |||
| [RFC6775] to constrained wired networks. | [RFC6775], where noted, to constrained wired networks. | |||
| An MS/TP device is typically based on a low-cost microcontroller with | An MS/TP device is typically based on a low-cost microcontroller with | |||
| limited processing power and memory. Together with low data rates | limited processing power and memory. Together with low data rates | |||
| and a small MAC address space, these constraints are similar to those | and a small MAC address space, these constraints are similar to those | |||
| faced in 6LoWPAN networks and suggest some elements of that solution | faced in 6LoWPAN networks and suggest some elements of that solution | |||
| might be leveraged. MS/TP differs significantly from 6LoWPAN in at | might be leveraged. MS/TP differs significantly from 6LoWPAN in at | |||
| least three respects: a) MS/TP devices typically have a continuous | least three respects: a) MS/TP devices typically have a continuous | |||
| source of power, b) all MS/TP devices on a segment can communicate | source of power, b) all MS/TP devices on a segment can communicate | |||
| directly so there are no hidden node or mesh routing issues, and c) | directly so there are no hidden node or mesh routing issues, and c) | |||
| recent changes to MS/TP provide support for larger payloads, | recent changes to MS/TP provide support for larger payloads, | |||
| skipping to change at page 5, line 42 ¶ | skipping to change at page 5, line 42 ¶ | |||
| For COBS-encoded frames, the Length field indicates the size of the | For COBS-encoded frames, the Length field indicates the size of the | |||
| [COBS] Encoded Data field in octets, plus three. (This adjustment is | [COBS] Encoded Data field in octets, plus three. (This adjustment is | |||
| required in order for legacy MS/TP devices to ignore COBS-encoded | required in order for legacy MS/TP devices to ignore COBS-encoded | |||
| frames.) See Section 4 and Appendices for additional details. | frames.) See Section 4 and Appendices for additional details. | |||
| The Header CRC field covers the Frame Type, Destination Address, | The Header CRC field covers the Frame Type, Destination Address, | |||
| Source Address, and Length fields. The Header CRC generation and | Source Address, and Length fields. The Header CRC generation and | |||
| check procedures are specified in BACnet [Clause9]. | check procedures are specified in BACnet [Clause9]. | |||
| Use of the optional 0xFF trailer octet is discussed in BACnet | ||||
| [Clause9]. | ||||
| 1.4. Goals and Constraints | 1.4. Goals and Constraints | |||
| The primary goal of this specification is to enable IPv6 directly on | The primary goal of this specification is to enable IPv6 directly on | |||
| wired end devices in building automation and control networks by | wired end devices in building automation and control networks by | |||
| leveraging existing standards to the greatest extent possible. A | leveraging existing standards to the greatest extent possible. A | |||
| secondary goal is to co-exist with legacy MS/TP implementations. | secondary goal is to co-exist with legacy MS/TP implementations. | |||
| Only the minimum changes necessary to support IPv6 over MS/TP were | Only the minimum changes necessary to support IPv6 over MS/TP were | |||
| specified in BACnet [Addendum_an] (see Section 1.3). | specified in BACnet [Addendum_an] (see Section 1.3). | |||
| In order to co-exist with legacy devices, no changes are permitted to | In order to co-exist with legacy devices, no changes are permitted to | |||
| the MS/TP addressing modes, frame header format, control frames, or | the MS/TP addressing modes, frame header format, control frames, or | |||
| Master Node state machine as specified in BACnet [Clause9]. | Master Node state machine as specified in BACnet [Clause9]. | |||
| 2. MS/TP Mode for IPv6 | 2. MS/TP Mode for IPv6 | |||
| ASHRAE has assigned an MS/TP Frame Type value of 34 to indicate IPv6 | ASHRAE has assigned an MS/TP Frame Type value of 34 to indicate IPv6 | |||
| over MS/TP (LoBAC) Encapsulation. This falls within the range of | over MS/TP (LoBAC) Encapsulation. This falls within the range of | |||
| values that designate COBS-encoded data frames. | values that designate COBS-encoded data frames. | |||
| All MS/TP master nodes (including those that support IPv6) must | All MS/TP master nodes (including those that support IPv6) MUST | |||
| implement the Master Node state machine specified in BACnet [Clause9] | implement the Master Node state machine specified in BACnet [Clause9] | |||
| and handle Token, Poll For Master, and Reply to Poll For Master | and handle Token, Poll For Master, and Reply to Poll For Master | |||
| control frames. MS/TP master nodes that support IPv6 must also | control frames. MS/TP master nodes that support IPv6 MUST also | |||
| implement the Receive Frame state machine specified in [Clause9] as | implement the Receive Frame state machine specified in [Clause9] as | |||
| extended by BACnet [Addendum_an]. | extended by BACnet [Addendum_an]. | |||
| All MS/TP nodes that support IPv6 MUST support a data rate of 115,200 | All MS/TP nodes that support IPv6 MUST support a data rate of 115,200 | |||
| bit/s and MAY optionally support lower data rates as defined in | bit/s and MAY optionally support lower data rates as defined in | |||
| BACnet [Clause9]. | BACnet [Clause9]. | |||
| 3. Addressing Modes | 3. Addressing Modes | |||
| MS/TP node (MAC) addresses are one octet in length. The method of | MS/TP node (MAC) addresses are one octet in length. The method of | |||
| skipping to change at page 6, line 38 ¶ | skipping to change at page 6, line 41 ¶ | |||
| However, each MS/TP node on the link MUST have a unique address in | However, each MS/TP node on the link MUST have a unique address in | |||
| order to ensure correct MAC operation. | order to ensure correct MAC operation. | |||
| BACnet [Clause9] specifies that addresses 0 through 127 are valid for | BACnet [Clause9] specifies that addresses 0 through 127 are valid for | |||
| master nodes. The method specified in Section 6 for creating a MAC- | master nodes. The method specified in Section 6 for creating a MAC- | |||
| layer-derived Interface Identifier (IID) ensures that an IID of all | layer-derived Interface Identifier (IID) ensures that an IID of all | |||
| zeros can never result. | zeros can never result. | |||
| A Destination Address of 255 (all nodes) indicates a MAC-layer | A Destination Address of 255 (all nodes) indicates a MAC-layer | |||
| broadcast. MS/TP does not support multicast, therefore all IPv6 | broadcast. MS/TP does not support multicast, therefore all IPv6 | |||
| multicast packets SHOULD be broadcast at the MAC layer and filtered | multicast packets MUST be broadcast at the MAC layer and filtered at | |||
| at the IPv6 layer. A Source Address of 255 MUST NOT be used. | the IPv6 layer. A Source Address of 255 MUST NOT be used. | |||
| Hosts learn IPv6 prefixes via router advertisements according to | Hosts learn IPv6 prefixes via router advertisements according to | |||
| [RFC4861]. | [RFC4861]. | |||
| 4. Maximum Transmission Unit (MTU) | 4. Maximum Transmission Unit (MTU) | |||
| BACnet [Addendum_an] supports MSDUs up to 2032 octets in length. | BACnet [Addendum_an] supports MSDUs up to 2032 octets in length. | |||
| This specification defines an MSDU length of at least 1280 octets and | This specification defines an MSDU length of at least 1280 octets and | |||
| at most 1500 octets (before encoding). This is sufficient to convey | at most 1500 octets (before encoding). This is sufficient to convey | |||
| the minimum MTU required by IPv6 [RFC2460] without the need for link- | the minimum MTU required by IPv6 [RFC2460] without the need for link- | |||
| layer fragmentation and reassembly. Support for an MSDU length of | layer fragmentation and reassembly. Support for an MSDU length of | |||
| 1500 octets is RECOMMENDED. | 1500 octets is RECOMMENDED. | |||
| 5. LoBAC Adaptation Layer | 5. LoBAC Adaptation Layer | |||
| The relatively low data rates of MS/TP indicate header compression as | The relatively low data rates of MS/TP dictate header compression as | |||
| a means to reduce latency. This section specifies an adaptation | a means to reduce latency. This section specifies an adaptation | |||
| layer to support compressed IPv6 headers and the compression format | layer to support compressed IPv6 headers as specified in Section 10. | |||
| is specified in Section 10. | IPv6 header compression MUST be implemented on all nodes. | |||
| Implementations MAY also support Generic Header Compression (GHC) | Implementations MAY also support Generic Header Compression (GHC) | |||
| [RFC7400] for transport layer headers. A node implementing [RFC7400] | [RFC7400] for transport layer headers. A node implementing [RFC7400] | |||
| MUST probe its peers for GHC support before applying GHC. | MUST probe its peers for GHC support before applying GHC. | |||
| The encapsulation format defined in this section (subsequently | The encapsulation format defined in this section (subsequently | |||
| referred to as the "LoBAC" encapsulation) comprises the MSDU of an | referred to as the "LoBAC" encapsulation) comprises the MSDU of an | |||
| IPv6 over MS/TP frame. The LoBAC payload (i.e., an IPv6 packet) | IPv6 over MS/TP frame. The LoBAC payload (i.e., an IPv6 packet) | |||
| follows an encapsulation header stack. LoBAC is a subset of the | follows an encapsulation header stack. LoBAC is a subset of the | |||
| LoWPAN encapsulation defined in [RFC4944] and extended by [RFC6282], | LoWPAN encapsulation defined in [RFC4944] and extended by [RFC6282], | |||
| skipping to change at page 8, line 30 ¶ | skipping to change at page 8, line 30 ¶ | |||
| |0 1|1 3|3 4|4 6| | |0 1|1 3|3 4|4 6| | |||
| |0 5|6 1|2 7|8 3| | |0 5|6 1|2 7|8 3| | |||
| +----------------+----------------+----------------+----------------+ | +----------------+----------------+----------------+----------------+ | |||
| |0000000000000000|0000000011111111|1111111000000000|0000000001001111| | |0000000000000000|0000000011111111|1111111000000000|0000000001001111| | |||
| +----------------+----------------+----------------+----------------+ | +----------------+----------------+----------------+----------------+ | |||
| This is the RECOMMENDED method of forming an IID for use in link- | This is the RECOMMENDED method of forming an IID for use in link- | |||
| local addresses, as it affords the most efficient header compression | local addresses, as it affords the most efficient header compression | |||
| provided by the LOWPAN_IPHC [RFC6282] format specified in Section 10. | provided by the LOWPAN_IPHC [RFC6282] format specified in Section 10. | |||
| A 64-bit privacy IID is RECOMMENDED for each forwardable address and | A 64-bit random IID is RECOMMENDED for each globally scoped address | |||
| SHOULD be locally generated according to one of the methods cited in | and SHOULD be locally generated according to one of the methods cited | |||
| Section 12. A node that generates a 64-bit privacy IID MUST register | in Section 12. A node that generates a 64-bit random IID MUST | |||
| it with its local router(s) by sending a Neighbor Solicitation (NS) | register it with its local router(s) by sending a Neighbor | |||
| message with the Address Registration Option (ARO) and process | Solicitation (NS) message with the Address Registration Option (ARO) | |||
| Neighbor Advertisements (NA) according to [RFC6775]. | and process Neighbor Advertisements (NA) according to [RFC6775]. | |||
| An IPv6 address prefix used for stateless autoconfiguration [RFC4862] | An IPv6 address prefix used for stateless autoconfiguration [RFC4862] | |||
| of an MS/TP interface MUST have a length of 64 bits. | of an MS/TP interface MUST have a length of 64 bits. | |||
| 7. IPv6 Link Local Address | 7. IPv6 Link Local Address | |||
| The IPv6 link-local address [RFC4291] for an MS/TP interface is | The IPv6 link-local address [RFC4291] for an MS/TP interface is | |||
| formed by appending the Interface Identifier, as defined above, to | formed by appending the Interface Identifier, as defined above, to | |||
| the prefix FE80::/64. | the prefix FE80::/64. | |||
| skipping to change at page 9, line 43 ¶ | skipping to change at page 9, line 43 ¶ | |||
| Length: This is the length of this option (including the type and | Length: This is the length of this option (including the type and | |||
| length fields) in units of 8 octets. The value of this field is 1 | length fields) in units of 8 octets. The value of this field is 1 | |||
| for 8-bit MS/TP MAC addresses. | for 8-bit MS/TP MAC addresses. | |||
| MS/TP Address: The 8-bit address in canonical bit order [RFC2469]. | MS/TP Address: The 8-bit address in canonical bit order [RFC2469]. | |||
| This is the unicast address the interface currently responds to. | This is the unicast address the interface currently responds to. | |||
| 9. Multicast Address Mapping | 9. Multicast Address Mapping | |||
| All IPv6 multicast packets SHOULD be sent to MS/TP Destination | All IPv6 multicast packets MUST be sent to MS/TP Destination Address | |||
| Address 255 (broadcast) and filtered at the IPv6 layer. When | 255 (broadcast) and filtered at the IPv6 layer. When represented as | |||
| represented as a 16-bit address in a compressed header (see | a 16-bit address in a compressed header (see Section 10), it MUST be | |||
| Section 10), it MUST be formed by padding on the left with a zero: | formed by padding on the left with a zero: | |||
| 0 1 | 0 1 | |||
| 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 | 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 | |||
| +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | |||
| | 0x00 | 0xFF | | | 0x00 | 0xFF | | |||
| +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+---------------+ | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+---------------+ | |||
| 10. Header Compression | 10. Header Compression | |||
| LoBAC uses LOWPAN_IPHC IPv6 compression, which is specified in | LoBAC uses LOWPAN_IPHC IPv6 compression, which is specified in | |||
| skipping to change at page 10, line 41 ¶ | skipping to change at page 10, line 41 ¶ | |||
| 11. IANA Considerations | 11. IANA Considerations | |||
| This document uses values previously reserved by [RFC4944] and | This document uses values previously reserved by [RFC4944] and | |||
| [RFC6282] and makes no further requests of IANA. | [RFC6282] and makes no further requests of IANA. | |||
| Note to RFC Editor: this section may be removed upon publication. | Note to RFC Editor: this section may be removed upon publication. | |||
| 12. Security Considerations | 12. Security Considerations | |||
| Forwardable addresses that contain IIDs generated using MS/TP node | Globally scoped addresses that contain IIDs generated using MS/TP | |||
| addresses may expose a network to address scanning attacks. For this | node addresses may expose a network to address scanning attacks. For | |||
| reason, it is RECOMMENDED that a different (but stable) IID be | this reason, it is RECOMMENDED that a different (but stable) IID be | |||
| generated for each forwardable address in use according to, for | generated for each globally scoped address in use according to, for | |||
| example, [RFC3315], [RFC3972], [RFC4941], [RFC5535], or [RFC7217]. | example, [RFC3315], [RFC3972], [RFC4941], [RFC5535], or [RFC7217]. | |||
| MS/TP networks are by definition wired and not susceptible to casual | MS/TP networks are by definition wired and not susceptible to casual | |||
| eavesdropping. By the same token, MS/TP nodes are stationary and | eavesdropping. By the same token, MS/TP nodes are stationary and | |||
| correlation of activities or location tracking of individuals is | correlation of activities or location tracking of individuals is | |||
| unlikely. | unlikely. See [I-D.ietf-6lo-privacy-considerations] for a full | |||
| discussion of mitigation of the threats posed to constrained nodes. | ||||
| 13. Acknowledgments | 13. Acknowledgments | |||
| We are grateful to the authors of [RFC4944] and members of the IETF | We are grateful to the authors of [RFC4944] and members of the IETF | |||
| 6LoWPAN working group; this document borrows liberally from their | 6LoWPAN working group; this document borrows liberally from their | |||
| work. Ralph Droms and Brian Haberman provided indispensable guidance | work. Ralph Droms and Brian Haberman provided indispensable guidance | |||
| and support from the outset. Peter van der Stok, James Woodyatt, and | and support from the outset. Peter van der Stok, James Woodyatt, and | |||
| Carsten Bormann provided detailed reviews. Stuart Cheshire invented | Carsten Bormann provided detailed reviews. Stuart Cheshire invented | |||
| the very clever COBS encoding. Michael Osborne made the critical | the very clever COBS encoding. Michael Osborne made the critical | |||
| observation that separately encoding the data and CRC32K fields would | observation that separately encoding the data and CRC32K fields would | |||
| skipping to change at page 13, line 28 ¶ | skipping to change at page 13, line 28 ¶ | |||
| Applications", IEEE/IFIP International Conference on | Applications", IEEE/IFIP International Conference on | |||
| Dependable Systems and Networks (DSN 2002) , June 2002, | Dependable Systems and Networks (DSN 2002) , June 2002, | |||
| <http://www.ece.cmu.edu/~koopman/networks/dsn02/ | <http://www.ece.cmu.edu/~koopman/networks/dsn02/ | |||
| dsn02_koopman.pdf>. | dsn02_koopman.pdf>. | |||
| [EUI-64] IEEE, "Guidelines for 64-bit Global Identifier (EUI-64) | [EUI-64] IEEE, "Guidelines for 64-bit Global Identifier (EUI-64) | |||
| Registration Authority", March 1997, | Registration Authority", March 1997, | |||
| <http://standards.ieee.org/regauth/oui/tutorials/ | <http://standards.ieee.org/regauth/oui/tutorials/ | |||
| EUI64.html>. | EUI64.html>. | |||
| [I-D.ietf-6lo-privacy-considerations] | ||||
| Thaler, D., "Privacy Considerations for IPv6 Adaptation | ||||
| Layer Mechanisms", draft-ietf-6lo-privacy- | ||||
| considerations-04 (work in progress), October 2016. | ||||
| [IEEE.802.3] | [IEEE.802.3] | |||
| "Information technology - Telecommunications and | "Information technology - Telecommunications and | |||
| information exchange between systems - Local and | information exchange between systems - Local and | |||
| metropolitan area networks - Specific requirements - Part | metropolitan area networks - Specific requirements - Part | |||
| 3: Carrier Sense Multiple Access with Collision Detection | 3: Carrier Sense Multiple Access with Collision Detection | |||
| (CMSA/CD) Access Method and Physical Layer | (CMSA/CD) Access Method and Physical Layer | |||
| Specifications", IEEE Std 802.3-2012, December 2012, | Specifications", IEEE Std 802.3-2012, December 2012, | |||
| <http://standards.ieee.org/getieee802/802.3.html>. | <http://standards.ieee.org/getieee802/802.3.html>. | |||
| [RFC2469] Narten, T. and C. Burton, "A Caution On The Canonical | [RFC2469] Narten, T. and C. Burton, "A Caution On The Canonical | |||
| skipping to change at page 26, line 22 ¶ | skipping to change at page 27, line 22 ¶ | |||
| Phone: +1 781 296 9722 | Phone: +1 781 296 9722 | |||
| Email: kerlyn@ieee.org | Email: kerlyn@ieee.org | |||
| Jerry Martocci | Jerry Martocci | |||
| Johnson Controls, Inc. | Johnson Controls, Inc. | |||
| 507 E. Michigan St | 507 E. Michigan St | |||
| Milwaukee , WI 53202 | Milwaukee , WI 53202 | |||
| USA | USA | |||
| Phone: +1 414 524 4010 | Email: jpmartocci@sbcglobal.net | |||
| Email: jerald.p.martocci@jci.com | ||||
| Carl Neilson | Carl Neilson | |||
| Delta Controls, Inc. | Delta Controls, Inc. | |||
| 17850 56th Ave | 17850 56th Ave | |||
| Surrey , BC V3S 1C7 | Surrey , BC V3S 1C7 | |||
| Canada | Canada | |||
| Phone: +1 604 575 5913 | Phone: +1 604 575 5913 | |||
| Email: cneilson@deltacontrols.com | Email: cneilson@deltacontrols.com | |||
| End of changes. 19 change blocks. | ||||
| 32 lines changed or deleted | 40 lines changed or added | |||
This html diff was produced by rfcdiff 1.48. The latest version is available from http://tools.ietf.org/tools/rfcdiff/ | ||||