| < draft-ietf-6lo-use-cases-04.txt | draft-ietf-6lo-use-cases-05.txt > | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6Lo Working Group Y-G. Hong | 6Lo Working Group Y-G. Hong | |||
| Internet-Draft ETRI | Internet-Draft ETRI | |||
| Intended status: Informational C. Gomez | Intended status: Informational C. Gomez | |||
| Expires: September 6, 2018 UPC | Expires: January 1, 2019 UPC | |||
| Y-H. Choi | Y-H. Choi | |||
| ETRI | ETRI | |||
| D-Y. Ko | ||||
| SKtelecom | ||||
| AR. Sangi | AR. Sangi | |||
| Huaiyin Institute of Technology | Huaiyin Institute of Technology | |||
| T. Aanstoot | T. Aanstoot | |||
| Modio AB | Modio AB | |||
| S. Chakrabarti | S. Chakrabarti | |||
| March 5, 2018 | June 30, 2018 | |||
| IPv6 over Constrained Node Networks (6lo) Applicability & Use cases | IPv6 over Constrained Node Networks (6lo) Applicability & Use cases | |||
| draft-ietf-6lo-use-cases-04 | draft-ietf-6lo-use-cases-05 | |||
| Abstract | Abstract | |||
| This document describes the applicability of IPv6 over constrained | This document describes the applicability of IPv6 over constrained | |||
| node networks (6lo) and provides practical deployment examples. In | node networks (6lo) and provides practical deployment examples. In | |||
| addition to IEEE 802.15.4, various link layer technologies such as | addition to IEEE 802.15.4, various link layer technologies such as | |||
| ITU-T G.9959 (Z-Wave), BLE, DECT-ULE, MS/TP, NFC, PLC (IEEE 1901.2), | ITU-T G.9959 (Z-Wave), BLE, DECT-ULE, MS/TP, NFC, PLC (IEEE 1901.2), | |||
| and IEEE 802.15.4e (6tisch) are used as examples. The document | and IEEE 802.15.4e (6tisch) are used as examples. The document | |||
| targets an audience who like to understand and evaluate running end- | targets an audience who like to understand and evaluate running end- | |||
| to-end IPv6 over the constrained node networks connecting devices to | to-end IPv6 over the constrained node networks connecting devices to | |||
| skipping to change at page 1, line 48 ¶ | skipping to change at page 1, line 46 ¶ | |||
| Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering | Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering | |||
| Task Force (IETF). Note that other groups may also distribute | Task Force (IETF). Note that other groups may also distribute | |||
| working documents as Internet-Drafts. The list of current Internet- | working documents as Internet-Drafts. The list of current Internet- | |||
| Drafts is at https://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/current/. | Drafts is at https://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/current/. | |||
| Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months | Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months | |||
| and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any | and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any | |||
| time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference | time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference | |||
| material or to cite them other than as "work in progress." | material or to cite them other than as "work in progress." | |||
| This Internet-Draft will expire on September 6, 2018. | This Internet-Draft will expire on January 1, 2019. | |||
| Copyright Notice | Copyright Notice | |||
| Copyright (c) 2018 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the | Copyright (c) 2018 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the | |||
| document authors. All rights reserved. | document authors. All rights reserved. | |||
| This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal | This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal | |||
| Provisions Relating to IETF Documents | Provisions Relating to IETF Documents | |||
| (https://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of | (https://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of | |||
| publication of this document. Please review these documents | publication of this document. Please review these documents | |||
| skipping to change at page 2, line 32 ¶ | skipping to change at page 2, line 32 ¶ | |||
| 1. Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 | 1. Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 | |||
| 2. Conventions and Terminology . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 | 2. Conventions and Terminology . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 | |||
| 3. 6lo Link layer technologies and possible candidates . . . . . 4 | 3. 6lo Link layer technologies and possible candidates . . . . . 4 | |||
| 3.1. ITU-T G.9959 (specified) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 | 3.1. ITU-T G.9959 (specified) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 | |||
| 3.2. Bluetooth LE (specified) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 | 3.2. Bluetooth LE (specified) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 | |||
| 3.3. DECT-ULE (specified) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 | 3.3. DECT-ULE (specified) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 | |||
| 3.4. MS/TP (specified) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 | 3.4. MS/TP (specified) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 | |||
| 3.5. NFC (specified) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 | 3.5. NFC (specified) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 | |||
| 3.6. PLC (specified) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7 | 3.6. PLC (specified) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7 | |||
| 3.7. IEEE 802.15.4e (specified) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7 | 3.7. IEEE 802.15.4e (specified) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7 | |||
| 3.8. LTE MTC (example of a potential candidate) . . . . . . . 8 | 3.8. Comparison between 6lo Link layer technologies . . . . . 8 | |||
| 3.9. Comparison between 6lo Link layer technologies . . . . . 9 | 4. 6lo Deployment Scenarios . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9 | |||
| 4. 6lo Deployment Scenarios . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10 | 4.1. jupitermesh in Smart Grid using 6lo in network layer . . 9 | |||
| 4.1. jupitermesh in Smart Grid using 6lo in network layer . . 10 | 4.2. Wi-SUN usage of 6lo stacks . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11 | |||
| 4.2. Wi-SUN usage of 6lo stacks . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12 | 4.3. G3-PLC usage of 6lo in network layer . . . . . . . . . . 12 | |||
| 4.3. G3-PLC usage of 6lo in network layer . . . . . . . . . . 13 | 4.4. Netricity usage of 6lo in network layer . . . . . . . . . 13 | |||
| 4.4. Netricity usage of 6lo in network layer . . . . . . . . . 14 | 5. Design Space and Guidelines for 6lo Deployment . . . . . . . 14 | |||
| 5. Design Space and Guidelines for 6lo Deployment . . . . . . . 15 | 5.1. Design Space Dimensions for 6lo Deployment . . . . . . . 14 | |||
| 5.1. Design Space Dimensions for 6lo Deployment . . . . . . . 15 | 5.2. Guidelines for adopting IPv6 stack (6lo/6LoWPAN) . . . . 16 | |||
| 5.2. Guidelines for adopting IPv6 stack (6lo/6LoWPAN) . . . . 17 | 6. 6lo Use Case Examples . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17 | |||
| 6. 6lo Use Case Examples . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18 | 7. IANA Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18 | |||
| 7. IANA Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19 | 8. Security Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18 | |||
| 8. Security Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19 | 9. Acknowledgements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18 | |||
| 9. Acknowledgements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19 | 10. References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19 | |||
| 10. References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20 | 10.1. Normative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19 | |||
| 10.1. Normative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20 | 10.2. Informative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21 | |||
| 10.2. Informative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22 | Appendix A. Other 6lo Use Case Examples . . . . . . . . . . . . 23 | |||
| Appendix A. Other 6lo Use Case Examples . . . . . . . . . . . . 24 | A.1. Use case of ITU-T G.9959: Smart Home . . . . . . . . . . 23 | |||
| A.1. Use case of ITU-T G.9959: Smart Home . . . . . . . . . . 24 | A.2. Use case of DECT-ULE: Smart Home . . . . . . . . . . . . 24 | |||
| A.2. Use case of DECT-ULE: Smart Home . . . . . . . . . . . . 25 | A.3. Use case of MS/TP: Building Automation Networks . . . . . 25 | |||
| A.3. Use case of MS/TP: Building Automation Networks . . . . . 26 | A.4. Use case of NFC: Alternative Secure Transfer . . . . . . 25 | |||
| A.4. Use case of NFC: Alternative Secure Transfer . . . . . . 26 | A.5. Use case of PLC: Smart Grid . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 26 | |||
| A.5. Use case of PLC: Smart Grid . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 27 | A.6. Use case of IEEE 802.15.4e: Industrial Automation . . . . 27 | |||
| A.6. Use case of IEEE 802.15.4e: Industrial Automation . . . . 28 | Authors' Addresses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 27 | |||
| Authors' Addresses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 28 | ||||
| 1. Introduction | 1. Introduction | |||
| Running IPv6 on constrained node networks has different features from | Running IPv6 on constrained node networks has different features from | |||
| general node networks due to the characteristics of constrained node | general node networks due to the characteristics of constrained node | |||
| networks such as small packet size, short link-layer address, low | networks such as small packet size, short link-layer address, low | |||
| bandwidth, network topology, low power, low cost, and large number of | bandwidth, network topology, low power, low cost, and large number of | |||
| devices [RFC4919][RFC7228]. For example, some IEEE 802.15.4 link | devices [RFC4919][RFC7228]. For example, some IEEE 802.15.4 link | |||
| layers have a frame size of 127 octets and IPv6 requires the layer | layers have a frame size of 127 octets and IPv6 requires the layer | |||
| below to support an MTU of 1280 bytes, therefore an appropriate | below to support an MTU of 1280 bytes, therefore an appropriate | |||
| skipping to change at page 8, line 35 ¶ | skipping to change at page 8, line 35 ¶ | |||
| over 99.999% end-to-end reliability. | over 99.999% end-to-end reliability. | |||
| - ultra low-power consumption. Off-the-shelf commercial products | - ultra low-power consumption. Off-the-shelf commercial products | |||
| offer over a decade of battery lifetime. | offer over a decade of battery lifetime. | |||
| - 6TiSCH at IETF defines communications of TSCH network and it | - 6TiSCH at IETF defines communications of TSCH network and it | |||
| uses 6LoWPAN stack [RFC7554]. | uses 6LoWPAN stack [RFC7554]. | |||
| IEEE 802.15.4e can be used for industrial automation. | IEEE 802.15.4e can be used for industrial automation. | |||
| 3.8. LTE MTC (example of a potential candidate) | 3.8. Comparison between 6lo Link layer technologies | |||
| LTE category defines the overall performance and capabilities of the | ||||
| UE (User Equipment). For example, the maximum down rate of category | ||||
| 1 UE and category 2 UE are 10.3 Mbit/s and 51.0 Mbit/s respectively. | ||||
| There are many categories in LTE standards. 3GPP standards defined | ||||
| the category 0 to be used for low rate IoT service in release 12. | ||||
| Since category 1 and category 0 could be used for low rate IoT | ||||
| service, these categories are called LTE MTC (Machine Type | ||||
| Communication) [LTE_MTC]. And 3GPP standards defined the MTC | ||||
| Enhancements in release 13. | ||||
| LTE MTC offer advantages in comparison to above category 2 and is | ||||
| appropriate to be used for low rate IoT services such as low power | ||||
| and low cost. | ||||
| LTE MTC can be used for tracking services, such as asset tracker, | ||||
| bicycle/cat tracker and etc with national wide. LTE MTC can be also | ||||
| used for monitoring & control service, such as car mobility record | ||||
| and weather observation that require much more traffic than other IoT | ||||
| services. Since the traffic collected by other IoT devices such as | ||||
| LoRa, Z-wave and BLE is small, LTE MTC can be used as a bachhaul of | ||||
| other IoT networks. | ||||
| 3.9. Comparison between 6lo Link layer technologies | ||||
| In above clauses, various 6lo Link layer technologies and a possible | In above clauses, various 6lo Link layer technologies and a possible | |||
| candidate are described. The following table shows that dominant | candidate are described. The following table shows that dominant | |||
| paramters of each use case corresponding to the 6lo link layer | paramters of each use case corresponding to the 6lo link layer | |||
| technology. | technology. | |||
| +-----------+--------+--------+--------+--------+--------+--------+--------+ | +-----------+--------+--------+--------+--------+--------+--------+--------+ | |||
| | | Z-Wave | BLE |DECT-ULE| MS/TP | NFC | PLC | TSCH | | | | Z-Wave | BLE |DECT-ULE| MS/TP | NFC | PLC | TSCH | | |||
| +-----------+--------+--------+--------+--------+--------+--------+--------+ | +-----------+--------+--------+--------+--------+--------+--------+--------+ | |||
| | | Home |Interact| |Building| Health-| |Industr-| | | | Home |Interact| |Building| Health-| |Industr-| | |||
| skipping to change at page 20, line 15 ¶ | skipping to change at page 19, line 15 ¶ | |||
| Thomas Watteyne, Pascal Thubert, Xavier Vilajosana, Daniel Migault, | Thomas Watteyne, Pascal Thubert, Xavier Vilajosana, Daniel Migault, | |||
| and Jianqiang HOU have provided valuable feedback for this draft. | and Jianqiang HOU have provided valuable feedback for this draft. | |||
| Das Subir and Michel Veillette have provided valuable information of | Das Subir and Michel Veillette have provided valuable information of | |||
| jupiterMesh and Paul Duffy has provided valuable information of Wi- | jupiterMesh and Paul Duffy has provided valuable information of Wi- | |||
| SUN for this draft. Also, Jianqiang Hou has provided valuable | SUN for this draft. Also, Jianqiang Hou has provided valuable | |||
| information of G3-PLC and Netricity for this draft. Kerry Lynn and | information of G3-PLC and Netricity for this draft. Kerry Lynn and | |||
| Dave Robin have provided valuable information of MS/TP and practical | Dave Robin have provided valuable information of MS/TP and practical | |||
| use case of MS/TP for this draft. | use case of MS/TP for this draft. | |||
| Deoknyong Ko has provided relevant text of LTE-MTC and he shared his | ||||
| experience to deploy IPv6 and 6lo technologies over LTE MTC in SK | ||||
| Telecom. | ||||
| 10. References | 10. References | |||
| 10.1. Normative References | 10.1. Normative References | |||
| [RFC2119] Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate | [RFC2119] Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate | |||
| Requirement Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119, | Requirement Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119, | |||
| DOI 10.17487/RFC2119, March 1997, | DOI 10.17487/RFC2119, March 1997, | |||
| <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc2119>. | <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc2119>. | |||
| [RFC4919] Kushalnagar, N., Montenegro, G., and C. Schumacher, "IPv6 | [RFC4919] Kushalnagar, N., Montenegro, G., and C. Schumacher, "IPv6 | |||
| skipping to change at page 22, line 47 ¶ | skipping to change at page 22, line 12 ¶ | |||
| Communication", draft-ietf-6lo-nfc-09 (work in progress), | Communication", draft-ietf-6lo-nfc-09 (work in progress), | |||
| January 2018. | January 2018. | |||
| [I-D.ietf-lwig-energy-efficient] | [I-D.ietf-lwig-energy-efficient] | |||
| Gomez, C., Kovatsch, M., Tian, H., and Z. Cao, "Energy- | Gomez, C., Kovatsch, M., Tian, H., and Z. Cao, "Energy- | |||
| Efficient Features of Internet of Things Protocols", | Efficient Features of Internet of Things Protocols", | |||
| draft-ietf-lwig-energy-efficient-08 (work in progress), | draft-ietf-lwig-energy-efficient-08 (work in progress), | |||
| October 2017. | October 2017. | |||
| [I-D.ietf-roll-aodv-rpl] | [I-D.ietf-roll-aodv-rpl] | |||
| Anamalamudi, S., Zhang, M., Sangi, A., Perkins, C., and S. | Anamalamudi, S., Zhang, M., Sangi, A., Perkins, C., Anand, | |||
| Anand, "Asymmetric AODV-P2P-RPL in Low-Power and Lossy | S., and B. Liu, "Asymmetric AODV-P2P-RPL in Low-Power and | |||
| Networks (LLNs)", draft-ietf-roll-aodv-rpl-02 (work in | Lossy Networks (LLNs)", draft-ietf-roll-aodv-rpl-03 (work | |||
| progress), September 2017. | in progress), March 2018. | |||
| [I-D.ietf-6tisch-6top-sfx] | [I-D.ietf-6tisch-6top-sfx] | |||
| Dujovne, D., Grieco, L., Palattella, M., and N. Accettura, | Dujovne, D., Grieco, L., Palattella, M., and N. Accettura, | |||
| "6TiSCH 6top Scheduling Function Zero / Experimental | "6TiSCH Experimental Scheduling Function (SFX)", draft- | |||
| (SFX)", draft-ietf-6tisch-6top-sfx-00 (work in progress), | ietf-6tisch-6top-sfx-01 (work in progress), March 2018. | |||
| September 2017. | ||||
| [I-D.ietf-6lo-blemesh] | [I-D.ietf-6lo-blemesh] | |||
| Gomez, C., Darroudi, S., and T. Savolainen, "IPv6 Mesh | Gomez, C., Darroudi, S., and T. Savolainen, "IPv6 Mesh | |||
| over BLUETOOTH(R) Low Energy using IPSP", draft-ietf-6lo- | over BLUETOOTH(R) Low Energy using IPSP", draft-ietf-6lo- | |||
| blemesh-02 (work in progress), September 2017. | blemesh-02 (work in progress), September 2017. | |||
| [I-D.satish-6tisch-6top-sf1] | [I-D.satish-6tisch-6top-sf1] | |||
| Anamalamudi, S., Liu, B., Zhang, M., Sangi, A., Perkins, | Anamalamudi, S., Liu, B., Zhang, M., Sangi, A., Perkins, | |||
| C., and S. Anand, "Scheduling Function One (SF1): hop-by- | C., and S. Anand, "Scheduling Function One (SF1): hop-by- | |||
| hop Scheduling with RSVP-TE in 6tisch Networks", draft- | hop Scheduling with RSVP-TE in 6tisch Networks", draft- | |||
| satish-6tisch-6top-sf1-04 (work in progress), October | satish-6tisch-6top-sf1-04 (work in progress), October | |||
| 2017. | 2017. | |||
| [I-D.hou-6lo-plc] | ||||
| Hou, J., Hong, Y., and X. Tang, "Transmission of IPv6 | ||||
| Packets over PLC Networks", draft-hou-6lo-plc-03 (work in | ||||
| progress), December 2017. | ||||
| [IETF_6lo] | [IETF_6lo] | |||
| "IETF IPv6 over Networks of Resource-constrained Nodes | "IETF IPv6 over Networks of Resource-constrained Nodes | |||
| (6lo) working group", | (6lo) working group", | |||
| <https://datatracker.ietf.org/wg/6lo/charter/>. | <https://datatracker.ietf.org/wg/6lo/charter/>. | |||
| [TIA-485-A] | [TIA-485-A] | |||
| "TIA, "Electrical Characteristics of Generators and | "TIA, "Electrical Characteristics of Generators and | |||
| Receivers for Use in Balanced Digital Multipoint Systems", | Receivers for Use in Balanced Digital Multipoint Systems", | |||
| TIA-485-A (Revision of TIA-485)", March 2003, | TIA-485-A (Revision of TIA-485)", March 2003, | |||
| <https://global.ihs.com/ | <https://global.ihs.com/ | |||
| skipping to change at page 24, line 10 ¶ | skipping to change at page 23, line 15 ¶ | |||
| [G.9959] "International Telecommunication Union, "Short range | [G.9959] "International Telecommunication Union, "Short range | |||
| narrow-band digital radiocommunication transceivers - PHY | narrow-band digital radiocommunication transceivers - PHY | |||
| and MAC layer specifications", ITU-T Recommendation", | and MAC layer specifications", ITU-T Recommendation", | |||
| January 2015. | January 2015. | |||
| [G.9903] "International Telecommunication Union, "Narrowband | [G.9903] "International Telecommunication Union, "Narrowband | |||
| orthogonal frequency division multiplexing power line | orthogonal frequency division multiplexing power line | |||
| communication transceivers for G3-PLC networks", ITU-T | communication transceivers for G3-PLC networks", ITU-T | |||
| Recommendation", August 2017. | Recommendation", August 2017. | |||
| [LTE_MTC] "3GPP TS 36.306 V13.0.0, 3rd Generation Partnership | ||||
| Project; Technical Specification Group Radio Access | ||||
| Network; Evolved Universal Terrestrial Radio Access | ||||
| (E-UTRA); User Equipment (UE) radio access capabilities | ||||
| (Release 13)", December 2015. | ||||
| [IEEE1901] | [IEEE1901] | |||
| "IEEE Standard, IEEE Std. 1901-2010 - IEEE Standard for | "IEEE Standard, IEEE Std. 1901-2010 - IEEE Standard for | |||
| Broadband over Power Line Networks: Medium Access Control | Broadband over Power Line Networks: Medium Access Control | |||
| and Physical Layer Specifications", 2010, | and Physical Layer Specifications", 2010, | |||
| <https://standards.ieee.org/findstds/ | <https://standards.ieee.org/findstds/ | |||
| standard/1901-2010.html>. | standard/1901-2010.html>. | |||
| [IEEE1901.1] | [IEEE1901.1] | |||
| "IEEE Standard (work-in-progress), IEEE-SA Standards | "IEEE Standard (work-in-progress), IEEE-SA Standards | |||
| Board", <http://sites.ieee.org/sagroups-1901-1/>. | Board", <http://sites.ieee.org/sagroups-1901-1/>. | |||
| skipping to change at page 29, line 30 ¶ | skipping to change at page 28, line 30 ¶ | |||
| Younghwan Choi | Younghwan Choi | |||
| ETRI | ETRI | |||
| 218 Gajeongno, Yuseong | 218 Gajeongno, Yuseong | |||
| Daejeon 305-700 | Daejeon 305-700 | |||
| Korea | Korea | |||
| Phone: +82 42 860 1429 | Phone: +82 42 860 1429 | |||
| Email: yhc@etri.re.kr | Email: yhc@etri.re.kr | |||
| Deoknyong Ko | ||||
| SKtelecom | ||||
| 9-1 Byundang-gu Sunae-dong, Seongnam-si | ||||
| Gyeonggi-do 13595 | ||||
| Korea | ||||
| Phone: +82 10 3356 8052 | ||||
| Email: engineer@sk.com | ||||
| Abdur Rashid Sangi | Abdur Rashid Sangi | |||
| Huaiyin Institute of Technology | Huaiyin Institute of Technology | |||
| No.89 North Beijing Road, Qinghe District | No.89 North Beijing Road, Qinghe District | |||
| Huaian 223001 | Huaian 223001 | |||
| P.R. China | P.R. China | |||
| Email: sangi_bahrian@yahoo.com | Email: sangi_bahrian@yahoo.com | |||
| Take Aanstoot | Take Aanstoot | |||
| Modio AB | Modio AB | |||
| S:t Larsgatan 15, 582 24 | S:t Larsgatan 15, 582 24 | |||
| Linkoping | Linkoping | |||
| Sweden | Sweden | |||
| Email: take@modio.se | Email: take@modio.se | |||
| Samita Chakrabarti | Samita Chakrabarti | |||
| San Jose, CA | San Jose, CA | |||
| USA | USA | |||
| Email: samitac.ietf@gmail.com | Email: samitac.ietf@gmail.com | |||
| End of changes. 15 change blocks. | ||||
| 84 lines changed or deleted | 40 lines changed or added | |||
This html diff was produced by rfcdiff 1.48. The latest version is available from http://tools.ietf.org/tools/rfcdiff/ | ||||